Re: whats the difference between these routes??

no it should cause i want that exception be propagated back to the caller, as a hint, what has been going wrong. Claus thx for the hint with the filter pattern, the only problem is, when using it the bean isAuthZBlocked isnt able to receive meanwhile incoming messages from another route.

Re: UnitTests Timing issues

or could it be that the bean isAuthZBlocked is blocked by camel, till the second call is done and the meanwhile incoming message is read just after that call ? -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/UnitTests-Timing-issues-tp4582016p4582202.html Sent from the Camel -

UnitTests Timing issues

my tests runs, but to test a received message from another Topic (received at the bean isAuthZBlocked) it would have to wait bit, ... (see Log, testing done before Imcoming has processed) as you see in my test... i use thread.sleep at the moment, which doesnt really works , some other idea ? Log [

Re: whats the difference between these routes??

exactly, when i take the filter, will it also allow me to throw an Exception , which will be brought to the caller ? (so that it gets a feedback, why it has been done) thx.. -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/whats-the-difference-between-these-routes-tp4563945p4565

Re: whats the difference between these routes??

this bean receives information from an other topic and should block the incoming message, if the informations are matching this incoming message and i thought that would be done through an Exception -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/whats-the-difference-between-th

Re: whats the difference between these routes??

the bean throws an exception, that should end further transport -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/whats-the-difference-between-these-routes-tp4563945p4565242.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

whats the difference between these routes??

the first one callled through a proxy, and the second is called directly in my unitests like String response = (String) inputEndpoint.requestBody("direct:injectRequest",getFileContent("src/main/resources/requests/request.xml")); the problem is, that sometimes this sAuthZBlocked should block, the

Re: Failed to build body from content. Serializable class not available to broker

yes, i do or shouldnt i do that ?? (context:i´m trying to use the topic as a many/many thing..., where producers send and one consumer responds and a other just listens, which should as close as possible to JMS (thats why i dont use a wiretap)) -- View this message in context: http://camel.46542

Re: Failed to build body from content. Serializable class not available to broker

thx, claus but thats not the point, ... why is it on the wire ? , it´s the product of an unmarshalling and directly inserted in an drools endpoints (see route), so it shouldnt be there, am i right ? -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Failed-to-build-body-from-cont

XPath namespaces in Spring DSL?

hey, another problem i´m facing is ... gets a xml as string the method head looks like this: public void checkRequest( @XPath("/Request/Subject/Attribute[@AttributeId='urn:oasis:names:tc:xacml:1.0:subject:subject-id']/AttributeValue/text()") String ref) but the xml is like

Failed to build body from content. Serializable class not available to broker

i get this exception at broker A, where it shouldn´t appear in my opinition the ClassNotFoundException is result of receiving the ContextRequestType which sounds clear, but why do i receive it ?? because the class is the result of the unmarshalling , so it shouldnt be directed to the wire , right

Re: Camel Blueprint Issue

the exception says Caused by: org.xml.sax.SAXParseException: cvc-complex-type.2.4.a: Invalid content was found starting with element 'setHeader'. One of '{"http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint":description, "http://camel.apache.org/schema/blueprint":body}' is expected. so the setHeader declar

Re: XML TO Queue

http://camel.apache.org/file2.html says that that the pattern for the file component is like that file:directoryName[?options] where directoryName is a directory and not a explicit file path (if you take the fuse ide plugin and create a new project, there will be an example where the file compo

possible to route "bean invocation messages"?

hey, i have a topic and two consumer have subscribed to it, the producer of the topic is a proxy. so the bean invocation is proxied to both subscribers, but what if i want that only subscriber A should answer on this topic and the other (b) just listens and consumes also the "real payload", which

broker shutdown all the time

if have configuirated an BrokerA<-> BrokerB connection, but it is always doing this on and on ... what does this error mean ? config A http://activemq.apache.org/schema/core"; brokerName="PdpAuthzServiceWrapper" persistent="false" useJmx="false">

Re: Is it possible to propagate an exception to the parent route?

ok i did it this way: Exception e = exchange.getProperty(Exchange.EXCEPTION_CAUGHT, Exception.class); i throught the exception is always set in the exchange, that is not correct. you have access it through the properties -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Is-i

Re: Is it possible to propagate an exception to the parent route?

ok the real problem is that the exeption is gone when i want to wrap it, is there an option to set the exception in the exchange in the doTry block , or give it as an parameter to the processor ? -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-propagate-an-

Re: Is it possible to propagate an exception to the parent route?

ok i have to confess the nullpointer was my fault,but i still loose my parsing exception, has it something to do with the doTry? (it has, i believe i´m loosing it there) -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-propagate-an-exception-to-the-parent-ro

Re: Is it possible to propagate an exception to the parent route?

i´m trying that by wrapping an exception in a RuntimeCamelException and the exception consumer is dewraping and throwing it again, but at the producer i´m getting a nullpointer, so somewhere i´m loosing the exception, cause i should get the runtimecamelException ... any ideas ? (thx, your answer

Re: Is it possible to propagate an exception to the parent route?

this case ? what if the connection between the child and parent is an activemq topic ? an active queue ? -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Is-it-possible-to-propagate-an-exception-to-the-parent-route-tp4541827p4541857.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing l

Re: Camel & Queue in Fuse4.4

(1)http://camel.apache.org/activemq.html.. yes , it will create a queue (if you wanna create a topiy you have got to declare it explicitly ) (2)http://camel.apache.org/log.html log:loggingCategory[?options] "component logs message exchanges to the underlying logging mechanism.","Where loggingCatego

Answer multiplication/ConnectionPooling/Whats that for ?

i read this about connection pooling http://camel.apache.org/activemq.html and efficient handling of connections sounds great, so i did it *g* (copy & past) but.. when testing like this (see at the end of the post), my mock (outputEndpoint) reveices 10 messages, which has to be the consequence of

Re: InvocationTargetException when startinhg active mq endpoint

thx mr ibsen, (https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/AMQ-3184) (Upgrade to camel 2.6.0) does that mean, that there exists no activemq version which works with camel 2.7.x or didnt i get that the sense of your post.. -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Invocation

Re: InvocationTargetException when startinhg active mq endpoint

it crashes when i take camel version 2.7.0 + when i start it with this properties all is fine 1.6 2.6.0-fuse-00-00 5.5.0 3.5 1.2.16 3.0.5.RELEASE 2.1 2.1.13 5.2.0.Final thats really weird.. when i comment out this the camel (2.7.2) is starting with

InvocationTargetException when startinhg active mq endpoint

whats this ? 442 [org.apache.camel.spring.Main.main()] INFO org.apache.camel.impl.converter.AnnotationTypeConverterLoader - Found 6 packages with 16 @Converter classes to load 3492 [org.apache.camel.spring.Main.main()] INFO org.apache.camel.impl.converter.DefaultTypeConverter - Loaded 159 type co

Re: Errorhandling Question: ExchangeTimeOutException

Thats the trace ouf my first: post 25723 [Camel (camel-3) thread #2 - JmsReplyManagerTimeoutChecker[services.global.xacml.authzRequests]] ERROR org.apache.camel.processor.DefaultErrorHandler - Failed delivery for exchangeId: ID-student02-bonn-tarent-de-57172-1308667766469-1-3. Exhausted after deliv

routing proxy´s over another broker

i have an set consisting of two active mq broker, one has an proxy definition.like this the other is the Service provider, like this: all works fine: So now i just want to extend the set, by p

routing proxy´s over another broker

i have an set consisting of two active mq broker, one has an proxy definition.like this the other is the Service provider, like this: all works fine: So now i just want to extend the set, by p

Re: Errorhandling Question: ExchangeTimeOutException

it is something like that that camel prppagates the exception back to the consumer, which is the activemq queue, and waits there till it gets the timeout? But if it would be something like that, why do i catch an UndeclaredThrowableException in the test ? thx -- View this message in context: htt

Errorhandling Question: ExchangeTimeOutException

i implemented an Proxy, which send the requests to an other activemq instance,which answers the request: (the broker are started with the peer protocol) (Broker A) (Broker B)

trigger direct:start route

i want to fire that route in the camel-context.xml for testing purposes , i thought that the direct component would do that by himself but, it doesnt looks like... is there command which have to add to the camel

Re: what did i forgot? Bean integration through direct:start

sry but i dont really caught your intention. here is the testclass(generated with the fuse-ide) so yes it extends the CamelSpringTestSupport, it has an mock-endpoint and what method did you mean? public class CamelContextXmlTest extends CamelSpringTestSupport { // expected message bodies

Re: what did i forgot? Bean integration through direct:start

so i wrote an unit test @Test public void testDirectSending() throws Exception{ // lets route from the output endpoints to our mock endpoints so we can assert expectations context.addRoutes(new RouteBuilder() { @Override

Re: what did i forgot? Bean integration through direct:start

could it be that the bean is treated like an processor and not like an input Endpoint (what i want to have) -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/what-did-i-forgot-Bean-integration-through-direct-start-tp4490510p4491646.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list a

Re: what did i forgot? Bean integration through direct:start

yeah the fuse-ide... but still the same, hm maybe my maven is doing something... -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/what-did-i-forgot-Bean-integration-through-direct-start-tp4490510p4491358.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: what did i forgot? Bean integration through direct:start

thats the problem i´m sending nothing out of this class!!! it seems like camel doesnt knows/uses it, but i added the bean in camel-context i have reduced it ... So i just wanna send something out these class (which would be comparable to http://camel.apache.org/bean.html (beans as Endpoint)) pub

Re: what did i forgot? Bean integration through direct:start

ok, let me explain: i have serveral routes Generate some processes to embedded drools

Re: what did i forgot? Bean integration through direct:start

still the same, so i think camel isnt really using this class! cause if it would there should be an exception that the xacml parsing fails, cause there is no request file to parse without the consume annotation so do i have to do somethink more , than just ? -- View this message in context: ht

Re: what did i forgot? Bean integration through direct:start

yes i already tried it, it is something my fuse-ide eclipse plugin does , i think, (do you also have problems when trying to save the camel-context, that you have to switch to design and back to source before it really saves the context you wrote ?) but it is still the same no request received

what did i forgot? Bean integration through direct:start

i got this class public class XacmlRequester { @Produce(uri = "activemq:topic:xacml.authzRequests") ProducerTemplate producer; @InOnly @Consume(uri = "file:src/data/requests?noop=true") public void generateRequest(File request){