Hello everyone.
I'm wondering why the log keyword might not take an expression. As far as I
know, the message is turned into an expression in the
LogDefinition.createProcessor method. is it because it should only use the
simple expression language?
Thanks a lot,
Christophe
--
View this
Thanks Claus for your answer! I did test but did not succeed into making it
work as I wanted to (change the order of received message). Following your
advice, I've just added the streaming configuration to the multicast eip
such as following, is that correct?
val croute = new
Hello everyone
I have tried to test the parallel processing with Camel. The split was easy
and worked out of the box. I have some surprises and I'm wondering whenever
I'm understanding correctly the expected behaviour with the multicast. In
the Code below, I try to send messages to two routes.
Thanks, You are true.
Sorry, I should have pasted the code where I send exchanges again.
List(0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1, 0, 1).foreach(x =sendBody(direct:input, x))
I'm sending 10 exchanges. I hope I'll receive 10 in the end and I'm not
expecting aggregation in fact. I've controlled each sub
Thanks, Alexey
I added the end and then it worked.
Well, Claus was true also: Now, I've understood the parallel processing
is only on one exchange in one EIP at a time.
My sample works, thanks guys!!!
have a nice day
Le 01. 04. 15 15:47, alexey-s [via Camel] a écrit :
An incident that is
Just a little up to this thread to announce that an experimental java 8 DSL
has been release. It's tends to provides the same features as the Babel
Scala DSL within Java 8, taking advantages of lambdas.
Sources are available at
https://github.com/Crossing-Tech/babel-experimental
If you have any
Hello everyone,
I'm currently working on error clauses and I got some strange behaviour
with camel in Scala. I would really enjoy having some feedback on what
I've tried to do because I haven't found any help on that. I saw Java
example that seamed to work and it's really currious for me.
