[Splitter] Problem with stopOnException when using threadPoolExecutor

2013-08-20 Thread Aida
this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Splitter-Problem-with-stopOnException-when-using-threadPoolExecutor-tp5737562.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Splitter] Problem with stopOnException when using threadPoolExecutor

2013-08-20 Thread Claus Ibsen
.n5.nabble.com/Splitter-Problem-with-stopOnException-when-using-threadPoolExecutor-tp5737562.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Claus Ibsen - Red Hat, Inc. Email: cib...@redhat.com Twitter: davsclaus Blog: http://davsclaus.com Author of Camel

Re: [Splitter] Problem with stopOnException when using threadPoolExecutor

2013-08-20 Thread Aida
. -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Splitter-Problem-with-stopOnException-when-using-threadPoolExecutor-tp5737562p5737570.html Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Re: [Splitter] Problem with stopOnException when using threadPoolExecutor

2013-08-20 Thread Claus Ibsen
the aggregationStrategy to propagate back the exception. As in this case I have the same behaviour and only for checking: threadPool shouldn´t interfere in this case, right? Thanks. -- View this message in context: http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Splitter-Problem-with-stopOnException-when