Re: Difference between camel-activemq (1.1.0) and activemq-camel (5.2.0) libraries

2011-04-07 Thread Hadrian Zbarcea
Yes, there is a subtle difference: 1. http://activemq.apache.org/how-should-i-package-applications-using-camel-and-activemq.html "[...] you may wish to use Camel's Enterprise Integration Patterns *inside* the ActiveMQ Broker [...]" 2. http://camel.apache.org/activemq.html http://camel.apache.

Re: Difference between camel-activemq (1.1.0) and activemq-camel (5.2.0) libraries

2011-04-07 Thread Bruno Borges
Exactly. Always choose ActiveMQ-Camel. It is the component written and maintained by the ActiveMQ team themselves. Bruno Borges www.brunoborges.com.br +55 21 76727099 "The glory of great men should always be measured by the means they have used to acquire it." - Francois de La Rochefoucauld

Difference between camel-activemq (1.1.0) and activemq-camel (5.2.0) libraries

2011-04-07 Thread Gert Villemos
What is the difference between the * Camel-Activemq (1.1.0) * Activemq-Camel (5.2.0) Libraries? Is the 'Camel-Activemq' library simply an old deprecated version no longer used? And should I always use 'Activemq-Camel'? Or is there a subtle difference? -- View this message in context: http:/