On 20 July 2010 16:38, Ron Smith wrote:
> Unfortunately, all those cool features (especially pooling and reconnect)
> are exactly why I was wanting to use something like camel. This isn't the
> first time that this companies unreasonable biases have limited my choices
> of tools. I'm not a fan of
Unfortunately, all those cool features (especially pooling and reconnect)
are exactly why I was wanting to use something like camel. This isn't the
first time that this companies unreasonable biases have limited my choices
of tools. I'm not a fan of spring or maven but I understand their value.
I
On Tue, Jul 20, 2010 at 5:17 PM, James Strachan
wrote:
> On 19 July 2010 22:12, Ron Smith wrote:
>> I'm with you, Jim. I think that is part of why others at my company consider
>> spring to be "evil" -- for a "light-weight" framework, there sure are a lot
>> of pieces you have to include and they
On 19 July 2010 22:12, Ron Smith wrote:
> I'm with you, Jim. I think that is part of why others at my company consider
> spring to be "evil" -- for a "light-weight" framework, there sure are a lot
> of pieces you have to include and they seem to be growing and becoming more
> intertwined with each
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 10:57 PM, Jim Newsham wrote:
> On 7/19/2010 8:13 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
>>
>> Hi
>>
>>
>> On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Ron Smith wrote:
>>>
>>> Where I work, Spring has been declared "evil" so I am attempting to use
>>> camel without any of the Spring JARs but I can't
I'm with you, Jim. I think that is part of why others at my company consider
spring to be "evil" -- for a "light-weight" framework, there sure are a lot
of pieces you have to include and they seem to be growing and becoming more
intertwined with each new release. Like you, I'm not griping, it just
On 7/19/2010 8:13 AM, Claus Ibsen wrote:
Hi
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Ron Smith wrote:
Where I work, Spring has been declared "evil" so I am attempting to use
camel without any of the Spring JARs but I can't find any examples of how to
setup a JMS component without a Spring dependency
So I am guessing that if I build my own JMS connection with the
ProducerTemplate, than I lose all of the nice features of the camel jms
component (like the reconnect logic, etc.) because the camel-jms is just a
wrapper around the spring-jms. I would have to rebuild all of that myself
without using
Hi
On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 8:06 PM, Ron Smith wrote:
> Where I work, Spring has been declared "evil" so I am attempting to use
> camel without any of the Spring JARs but I can't find any examples of how to
> setup a JMS component without a Spring dependency. I am using Tibco as the
> JMS provide
Where I work, Spring has been declared "evil" so I am attempting to use
camel without any of the Spring JARs but I can't find any examples of how to
setup a JMS component without a Spring dependency. I am using Tibco as the
JMS provider and it is providing JNDI.
Here is a sample code snippet which
10 matches
Mail list logo
