Thanks!
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Migrate-Apache-Camel-Endpoints-tp5741899p5742652.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
to do it, I'm all ears :S
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Migrate-Apache-Camel-Endpoints-tp5741899p5742562.html
>> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>
>
> --
.n5.nabble.com/Basic-Apache-Camel-LoadBalancer-Failover-Example-td5742551.html>
solved.
I also did a replicate in StackOverflow just in case someone else shows up
with information (I hope you don't feel offended by it).
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Mig
f there is an easier way to do it, I'm all ears :S
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Migrate-Apache-Camel-Endpoints-tp5741899p5742562.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
--
Claus Ibsen
--
an easier way to do it, I'm all ears :S
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Migrate-Apache-Camel-Endpoints-tp5741899p5742562.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Hi
Sounds like you are talking about reliable messaging / clustering.
This is what Apache ActiveMQ provides much better.
For example if you take a look at Apache ServiceMix, which is an ESB,
then ActiveMQ is the "reliable messaging" backbone of this ESB. And
Camel is the integration "glue" that m
failover mechanism right?
>
> Thanks for all the help, but I really need to understand the basics before
> charging anything else :P
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Migrate-Apache-Camel-Endpoints-tp5741899p5742538.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Migrate-Apache-Camel-Endpoints-tp5741899p5742538.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
If not, does it mean that I am forced to use Fuse?
>
> Thanks for the clarifications, you're helping a lot !
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Migrate-Apache-Camel-Endpoints-tp5741899p5742532.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Loadbalancer
with the failover feature right?
If not, does it mean that I am forced to use Fuse?
Thanks for the clarifications, you're helping a lot !
--
View this message in context:
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Migrate-Apache-Camel-Endpoints-tp5741899p5742532.html
Sent from the Camel -
gt; View this message in context:
> http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Migrate-Apache-Camel-Endpoints-tp5741899p5742492.html
> Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
http://camel.465427.n5.nabble.com/Migrate-Apache-Camel-Endpoints-tp5741899p5742492.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
The Migrating Endpoints is not what you want.
You may consider to use Camel Fabric[1][2] to that kind of work.
[1]http://fuse.fusesource.org/fabric/docs/overview.html#Camel_Fabric
[2]http://fusesource.com/docs/esbent/7.0/camel_comp_ref/Master.html
--
Willem Jiang
Red Hat, Inc.
Web: http://w
I have recently started with Apache Camel so apologies if this questions is
silly.
I have 2 processes A and B, and each process has an endpoint E1 and E2
respectively. Now let's imagine that I need to create a process C and that
process B has to die. Can I migrate E2 to C and connect it through a
65427.n5.nabble.com/Migrate-Apache-Camel-Endpoints-tp5741841.html
Sent from the Camel - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
15 matches
Mail list logo
