>>>
>>> ${header.EventCategory} ==
>>> 'SessionLogon'
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >>
>>
> uri="
affairs.de]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 3:08 PM
To: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: Route Dependency in XML DSL
sorry - I missed the XML prerequisite.
would it be an option to connect route A to B using a direct en
inal Message-
> From: Maruan Sahyoun [mailto:sahy...@fileaffairs.de]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 1:49 PM
> To: users@camel.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Route Dependency in XML DSL
>
> Hi,
>
> there is a sample how to stop a route from another one - can also be
>
XML DSL
> example. Is it possible in XML?
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Maruan Sahyoun [mailto:sahy...@fileaffairs.de]
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 1:49 PM
> To: users@camel.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Route Dependency in XML DSL
>
> Hi,
>
>
Thanks for responding. Unfortunately, this doesn't show any XML DSL
example. Is it possible in XML?
-Original Message-
From: Maruan Sahyoun [mailto:sahy...@fileaffairs.de]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 1:49 PM
To: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: Route Dependency in XML DS
es.
>
> Therefore, I don't think it should start till A finishes. Unless you
> could use some type of locking Mechanism.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Gershaw, Geoffrey
> Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 12:40 PM
> To: users@camel.apache.org
> Subject: RE: Ro
start creating exchanges.
Therefore, I don't think it should start till A finishes. Unless you
could use some type of locking Mechanism.
-Original Message-
From: Gershaw, Geoffrey
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 12:40 PM
To: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: RE: Route Dependency in XM
mail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 14, 2013 11:17 AM
To: users@camel.apache.org
Subject: Re: Route Dependency in XML DSL
Hi Geoffrey,
what do you mean by "route is finished" ?
Do you want to call route B at the end of rotue A?
Bilgin
On 14 January 2013 14:58, Gershaw, Ge
Hi Geoffrey,
what do you mean by "route is finished" ?
Do you want to call route B at the end of rotue A?
Bilgin
On 14 January 2013 14:58, Gershaw, Geoffrey
wrote:
> Geoffrey