Re: camel toD with replyTo in URI specifying IBM MQ queue manager

2018-03-01 Thread Paul Broughton Spida Solutions
Thanks Claus, I will certainly take a look at doing that. In the interim, I used your suggestion of a destination resolver. I am now overriding the default behaviour when its needed by injecting a destination resolver under certain conditions which is working fine for now. The better solution o

Re: camel toD with replyTo in URI specifying IBM MQ queue manager

2018-02-27 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi Thanks for the analysis. You can log a JIRA in the issue tracker (there is a link from this page) http://camel.apache.org/support.html You are welcome to dive into the source code in camel-jms to see if you can find where that normalization is and fix so it only prefix with double slashes. htt

Re: camel toD with replyTo in URI specifying IBM MQ queue manager

2018-02-27 Thread Paul Broughton Spida Solutions
Hi Claus, I am starting to think that perhaps this is a bug within the Camel JMS framework (I could be wrong). What appears to be happening when it comes to the replyTo queue name is the Queue Name value is “normalised” incorrectly. As I understand things, if the replyTo queue is specified with

Re: camel toD with replyTo in URI specifying IBM MQ queue manager

2018-02-26 Thread Claus Ibsen
Hi I think there is some destination resolver spi you can configure on the component/endpoint where you can add your java code to build the queue name using the IBM MQ client api. On Mon, Feb 26, 2018 at 12:42 PM, Paul Broughton Spida Solutions wrote: > Hi, I have a toD element in my route wh

camel toD with replyTo in URI specifying IBM MQ queue manager

2018-02-26 Thread Paul Broughton Spida Solutions
 Hi, I have a toD element in my route which sends to a jms Queue which is provided by IBM MQ. I have the CamelJMSDestinationName set to the queue and a uri which looks similar to the folowing wmq:queue:placeholder?preserveMessageQos=true&replyTo=myQM/myTestQ&exchangePattern=inOut&replyToType=shar