Hi guys, we installed a testing environment with cloudstack 4.4.2. In this
testing environment we have two centos 6.6 nodes with ovs 2.3.1.
Providing a virtual machine with a network service offering based on ovs,
we saw an is ovs bridge was automatically configured on kvm nodes but no
gre tunnel
If VR and VM on the same host works fine, then some vlan configuration is
missing on the switch connecting both the hosts. Make sure you have
configured the switch ports as tagged and allow all the vlans being used
for guest and public networks.
On Thu, Jun 4, 2015 at 6:38 AM, ilya wrote:
> Mike
I believe you can use storage XenMotion[0] for that. Not sure it can be
done from within cloudstack, but should be achievable.
[0] http://wiki.xen.org/wiki/Storage_XenMotion
2015-05-29 9:36 GMT-07:00 S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH :
> Hi,
>
> documentation is a little bit confusing about this. Is it po
You cant migrate local storage VM. This is not cloudstack, but general
storage setup you need to address.
Regards
ilya
On 5/29/15 9:36 AM, S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH wrote:
Hi,
documentation is a little bit confusing about this. Is it possible in CS 4.3
(XenServer 6.2 SP! as hypervisor) to migr
Mike
We are missing context of your lab setup.
Perhaps TCP dump can help with debugging?
Regards,
ilya
On 6/1/15 12:38 PM, Mike Crosson wrote:
I recently upgraded from 4.3 to 4.5 in a test lab and discovered that
networking is semi-broken. If I have 2 hosts, one running a virtual
router and
We tried changing the global setting but it is not taking effect after
restarting cloudstack-management, after removing and recreating vpn account
or even adding new users to the account to trigger an update of some kind.
After restarting the VPC and destroying the router multiple times it is
stil
Hi Ragael,
actually I'm running 4.0.3 :)
But I will check this, and let you know - there is compile flag to compile
without LRO, which I did, but... :)
Thanks, as usuall :)
On 4 June 2015 at 00:22, Rafael Fonseca wrote:
> Hi Andrija,
>
> I guess you're running 3.23.2.1 driver?
> If so, try go
Hi Andrija,
I guess you're running 3.23.2.1 driver?
If so, try going to the source dir and run:
sed -i -e '/#include /a #define IXGBE_NO_LRO'
src/kcompat.h
recompile & test
give feedback :)
Good luck,
Rafael
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 11:18 PM, Andrija Panic
wrote:
> Hi team,
>
> I'm wondering i
Continuing on this saga. I did the following:
xe vm-list resident-on=bf9bb7a9-ee8e-46de-855d-9712ed037943
And I get several VMs that XenServer thinks are still running on the bad
host. Once I get the host fixed and bring it back online what will happen
with all these? Will XS try to start them?
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 1:52 PM, Andrija Panic
wrote:
> Hi Carlos,
>
> Im not familiar with Zen, but on KVM - you would "virsh destroy i-xx-yy-VM"
> and then edit the DB set VM state to Stopped.
>
Hmm... Interesting... "xe vm-list" does show the VM as running. However I
was initially unable to sto
Hi team,
I'm wondering if anyone experienced similar issue with 10G intel
NICs/driver/Ubuntu 14.04 stock kernel:
2 x 10G Intel NIC,--> LACP bond -->, vlans--> bridges with vlan interface
as member...
(Ixgbe driver 4.0.3, latest, from Intel website, compiled withOUT LRO
support - since LRO breaks
Hi Carlos,
Im not familiar with Zen, but on KVM - you would "virsh destroy i-xx-yy-VM"
and then edit the DB set VM state to Stopped.
That should be sufficient to stop VM manually.
Check from Zen Center if possible to shutdown VM...
If you still start VM for some reason on bad host - you can pla
Hi All,
I have a cluster with a pod of 6 XenServer 6.2 hosts on CloudStack 4.4.0.
One of the hosts stopped/rebooted suddenly and now can't find its disks
(dell on the way). Luckily the host was not the pool master but it did
have the VR running on it so no instances could be created or started.
I need to change a few physical networks, from one interface to another.
Has anyone done something similar by moving the network label to another
interface?
--
Erik
I will start a discussion thread on dev ML.
> On 03-Jun-2015, at 11:42 am, Sudhansu Sahu wrote:
>
> In case of a out of band VM movement the VR will be rebooted to configure
> the network rules. The solution was for 4.3 where we don't have Aggregate
> command. In 4.5 we can use aggregate command
I think Remi will want to -1 4.4.4 for the same issue (and I will have to
honour that on the grounds of regression)
Op wo 3 jun. 2015 om 11:43 schreef Sudhansu Sahu :
> In case of a out of band VM movement the VR will be rebooted to configure
> the network rules. The solution was for 4.3 where we
Christian, if you find a limit we are very eager to know about it.
Op wo 3 jun. 2015 om 11:38 schreef Glenn Wagner :
> Hi,
>
> There is no actual hard and fast rule on the amount of Zones, The Limits
> will come in with the amount of Hosts and VM's you want to run.
>
>
> Glenn Wagner
> Senior Con
In case of a out of band VM movement the VR will be rebooted to configure
the network rules. The solution was for 4.3 where we don't have Aggregate
command. In 4.5 we can use aggregate command to push the network rule.
You can raise a defect.
On Mon, Jun 1, 2015 at 8:27 PM, Rene Moser wrote:
>
Hi,
There is no actual hard and fast rule on the amount of Zones, The Limits will
come in with the amount of Hosts and VM's you want to run.
Glenn Wagner
Senior Consultant, South Africa
Phone: +27 21 527 0091 | Mobile: +27 73 917 4111
glenn.wag...@shapeblue.com | www.shapeblue.com | Twitter
Hi René,
Thanks for bringing it up. I talked to Rohit and he pointed me towards:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7994
It seems it is done on purpose as a fix. I think we should discuss this on the
dev-list ;-)
Regards,
Remi
On 03 Jun 2015, at 08:44, ilya
mailto:ilya.mailing
Hi,
Can anyone tell me if there is a defined or theoretical limit to the
number of zones that a single instance of CloudStack can manage?
Many thanks,
-Christian
--
Christian Lafferty
21 matches
Mail list logo
