Hi all, Im on CS 4.4.2 with ESXi 5.5. Theres gonna be a maintenance of the
physical servers.
The question is: how do I proper shut down entire CS Infra? without having
problems when I power on it again.
Regards,
José
On 2015-06-04 00:37, Sanjeev N wrote:
If VR and VM on the same host works fine, then some vlan configuration
is
missing on the switch connecting both the hosts. Make sure you have
configured the switch ports as tagged and allow all the vlans being
used
for guest and public networks.
Everything
Hi, All,
I am Rajsekhar Kunnampally, working with Citrix CloudPlatform documentation
team. I am working from Citrix, Bangalore.
I have been associated with the CloudPlatform documentation team for the
past one year. My focus was on revamping the CloudPlatform documentation
set and creating conten
You should be able to use cloudstack to move a VM from Local Storage to
shared storage. but you might need to unmount the data disk and perform
this task with the VM as shutdown as the Migrate Instance button will allow
you to specify the Storage.
Regards,
On Wed, Jun 3, 2015 at 9:18 PM, Ahmad Em
True..Thanks Simon...
On 5 June 2015 at 16:28, Simon Weller wrote:
> I'm not sure whether that's configurable and I haven't seen any examples
> out there that point to it being configurable. Having said that, there are
> people a lot more familiar with that than I am on the list.
>
> One option
I'm not sure whether that's configurable and I haven't seen any examples out
there that point to it being configurable. Having said that, there are people a
lot more familiar with that than I am on the list.
One option you do have for this particular failure situation, is to use monit
to monit
Hi,
any hint on how to proceed ?
on haproxy I see rougly 50%/50% sessions across 2 backend servers.
But inside DB, it all points to the one mgmt_server_ip...
Thanks,
Andrija
On 4 June 2015 at 19:27, Andrija Panic wrote:
> And if of any help another hint:
>
> while Im having this lines sent t
Exactly...thanks Simon for the time and help :)
Is there any mysql timeout/retry parameter that is set in db.properties
(like db.cloud.queriesBeforeRetryMaster=5000), but I'm wondering since I'm
using keepalived/haproxy setup, it takes up to 5-6 sec for keepalive to
detect haproxy is down (while t
I think haproxy is a better design in my opinion. You're going to have to use
haproxy to balance the host agents to multiple management servers anyway, so
you'll already be using it. haproxy can then manage the health checks to Galera
rather than over complicating it with the CS Management confi
Thanks Simon - that is what I thought...
So my question would be then, haproxy vs native ACS/mysql connector going
to galera1/galera2/etc...will figure out, for now we use haproxy for
mysql/galera loadbalancing...
THanks a lot Simon,
Andrija
On 5 June 2015 at 15:18, Simon Weller wrote:
>
> Pe
Personally, I think that Gallera is always going to be a safer option, as it
handles conflict resolution natively. Having said that, it appears care has
been taken in designing the ACS MGMT DB integration so that the chance of
conflicts is very low. Galera requires a 3 nodes minimum, so it's a
Hi Simon,
thanks for the link - actually I have already read this - but Im still
seaking for some answeres :) :
- real world experience with DB HA in general - is i better to use
haproxy(clustered/redudant) for mysql towards Galera cluster - or simply to
reference 2 nodes (1 as master, another a
12 matches
Mail list logo
