Hi All,
Can anyone say will the ACS will support docker / RancherOS / CoreOS so
that we can create a container via cloudstack and assign same as now public
IP to the container.
Thanks,
Keerthi
France,
Sorry I missed this email. Was your issue solved? The ACS repo you’re using is
same as upstream 4.3.2 release, including the required. dependencies.
On 28-Jun-2015, at 7:13 pm, France
mailto:mailingli...@isg.si>> wrote:
Hi guys,
we are upgrading CS 4.3.1 to 4.3.2 currently.
Official
Need more logs (the relevant exception stack to be precise) to locate the root
cause of the error.
In addition, can you check the integrity of the following table/view (just
perform a select on these):
async_job_view
op_dc_ip_address_alloc
Regards,
Somesh
-Original Message-
From: Tila
Hi!
Am 10.07.2015 um 16:42 schrieb Timothy Lothering:
Hi Martin,
From the logs it seems that ACS has found that the host has sufficient memory
capacity, but when it deploys it, it seems there is not enough. It could be a
bug whereby technically the system has enough capacity, but during the
Tested recently, running the 32bit vhd-utils works for me:
root@s-73-VM:~# vhd-util
usage: vhd-util COMMAND [OPTIONS]
COMMAND := { create | snapshot | query | read | set | repair | resize | fill |
coalesce | modify | scan | check | revert }
root@s-73-VM:~# ldd /bin/vhd-util
linux-gate.so.1 => (0
Hi all,
Is anyone going to be traveling to the Silicon Valley on August 4th? The
CloudStack Silicon Valley User Group is planning to hold a meetup that
evening. Currently, we have David Nalley on the agenda and if anyone else
is interested in speaking at the meetup - please let me, John Kinsella o
Yes, you'd have to upgrade all the servers in the pool to resume full
operational status. In a mixed pool environment all/most operations other than
migrate (to newer version) are restricted.
Excerpt from XS docs:
You should plan your upgrade path carefully. Citrix strongly advise against
runni
Hi Martin,
From the logs it seems that ACS has found that the host has sufficient memory
capacity, but when it deploys it, it seems there is not enough. It could be a
bug whereby technically the system has enough capacity, but during the
provisioning stage, it suddenly does not.
errorInfo: [H
You can make many VM templates with different combinations of "blocks" or
software, as you want. - other than that, cloudstack will create new VM
from template or from ISO file - so not sure about what you asked...
i.e. you can have centos minimal, centos LAMP, centos LAMP-postgress etc...
best
O
Hi Sonali,
i don't think xenserver cluster will let you build vms in a cluster with
mixed versions,
this is from my previous experience , i have not tested in XS 6.5
Please upgrade all the xenservers in the cluster.
i think this is not a cloudstack issue
thanks
prashant
On Fri, Jul 10, 2
Hi,
I have general question about Cloudstack feature: does it have possibility to
create servers from blocks ? e.g. I'll have available separate Linux, Mysql,
Apache, Postgresql, FTPD, Xenvironment , and later when I want I'll build any
custom server with using above "blocks" ? The same questio
Hi,
I am trying to create new vm after ACS upgrade to 4.5.1. Also in cluster I have
2 xenserver upgraded to 6.5 and other two are maintenance mode since I have to
remove them , They both are 6.2.
But I am getting this error,
http://pastebin.com/fNVtAQwd
2015-07-10 15:56:53,186 WARN [c.c.h.x.
Here's an example, just adapt your IDs:
update network id=9ae34cc1-ad2c-470e-b41a-17ddd80576ce
networkofferingid=a7424978-f5a4-43df-ad77-4ae3cd54b391
-Original Message-
From: Gerolamo Valcamonica [mailto:cloudst...@overweb.it]
Sent: vendredi 10 juillet 2015 13:11
To: users@cloudstack.ap
Thank you.
Sorry, but i cannot find the right command in cloudmonkey to change
network offering
can you give me a suggestion?
Cloudmonkey commands on my installation are (with double tab):
assign
cancel
create
detach
mark
register
restart
shell
sync
activate
associate
change
delete
disable
e
Yes, here: http://apaste.info/zz4
From clicking on "create" to receiving the deployment error.
Ciao
Martin
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Timothy Lothering [mailto:tlother...@datacentrix.co.za]
Gesendet: Freitag, 10. Juli 2015 13:12
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: RE: Deployme
Thanks Martin,
Could you please dump your full logs somewhere so we can look into this further?
-Original Message-
From: Martin Emrich [mailto:martin.emr...@empolis.com]
Sent: 09 July 2015 03:49 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Deployment failed on XenServer due to capacit
Hi
We are running CP 4.2.1 on VMware and having some questions about the so
called "network throtteling" implementation.
CloudStack (CP) uses the VMware PortGroups to set the "traffic shaping"
settings in vCenter/vSphere to limit the bandwidth on the "Public Network".
I found this wiki entry
htt
Folks - just put up a brief blog post about the latest OpenSSL issue and how
that affects CloudStack. Long story short - we think it does, but are verifying
that. Hopefully will have an update by the end of the day.
https://blogs.apache.org/cloudstack/entry/cloudstack_and_openssl_cve_2015
Will
I've seen this before and as a workaround I've changed it with CloudMonkey who
handles this better.
Try from CM to see if you can change it.
Rgds
Patrick
-Original Message-
From: Sanjeev N [mailto:sanj...@apache.org]
Sent: vendredi 10 juillet 2015 07:58
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
S
19 matches
Mail list logo
