Sure – you can log bugs and feature requests on the official Jira board – just
make sure you open the ticket against the CloudStack project:
https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/Dashboard.jspa
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 20/10/2017, 16:01, "Jevgeni Zolotarjov" wrote:
true, it does.
But for understanding the problem, I would have to
1. analyze the logs,
2. multiply [service offering core count] x [service offering MHz] and
3. check it against the remainder from the indicator on the dashboard.
Yes, it works that way too. But then I also have to
4. consider cpu.o
Agree the error could be clearer – but if you check your CloudStack dashboard
the pie chart for CPU already tells you your CPU utilisation.
You can also use the listCapacity API call mentioned before:
# cloudmonkey list capacity
count = 9
capacity:
+--+--
Thanks a lot!
It was it!
Actually the error reporting could be done in a wiser way to inform
administrator about what is the problem in particular. Do you know, where
can I request this feature?
Regards,
Jevgeni
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 1:25 PM, Dag Sonstebo
wrote:
> Capacity type 1 is CPU: ht
Capacity type 1 is CPU:
http://cloudstack.apache.org/api/apidocs-4.10/apis/listCapacity.html
You would look at changing cluster.cpu.allocated.capacity.disablethreshold in
global settings – or the same under your cluster settings.
You can also play with cpu.overprovisioning.factor – but keep in
Ok, you decide, then)
20 окт. 2017 г. 17:16 пользователь "Jevgeni Zolotarjov" <
j.zolotar...@gmail.com> написал:
> I changed cluster.threshold.enabled to false. But it didn't help.
> I guess the root cause it something different.
>
> My storage capacity if above 3TB, and only under 300GB used.
>
I changed cluster.threshold.enabled to false. But it didn't help.
I guess the root cause it something different.
My storage capacity if above 3TB, and only under 300GB used.
No threshold setting was changed ever since installation.
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:59 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote:
> Ju
Just look for threshold. Logs don't include such information.
2017-10-20 16:56 GMT+07:00 Jevgeni Zolotarjov :
> What is exact parameter name?
>
> On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev <
> kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Ah, OK
> >
> > 2017-10-20 09:10:53,697 DEBUG [c.c.d.Fi
What is exact parameter name?
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:44 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote:
> Ah, OK
>
> 2017-10-20 09:10:53,697 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
> (API-Job-Executor-40:ctx-a4cff151 job-181 ctx-91a5717c) (logid:25e762a0)
> Cannot allocate cluster list [1] for vm creation since their all
Ah, OK
2017-10-20 09:10:53,697 DEBUG [c.c.d.FirstFitPlanner]
(API-Job-Executor-40:ctx-a4cff151 job-181 ctx-91a5717c) (logid:25e762a0)
Cannot allocate cluster list [1] for vm creation since their allocated
percentage crosses the disable capacity threshold defined at each cluster/
at global value fo
Hi,
Yes I have one host. But I have exactly zero affinity group
s - I dont use affinity groups. I could successfully add few instances and
they are running.
The exceptions says: InsufficientServerCapacityException
But there is plenty of storage.
Disk Total 3.24 TB
Disk Allocated 265.33 GB
On Fri
Hi,
Yes I have one host. But I have exactly zero affinity groups. I could
successfully add few instances and they are running.
The
On Fri, Oct 20, 2017 at 12:35 PM, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote:
> Hi,
> It seems you have one host and place several VMs in a single anti-affinity
> group, don't you? Th
Thanks guys, got it working after applying ingress rules and configuring
firewall rules of the template
From: Dag Sonstebo
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2017 12:12:12 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Iptables of Host machine blocks http traffic to Gues
Hi,
It seems you have one host and place several VMs in a single anti-affinity
group, don't you? This is how it should really work if you do that thing.
Anti-affinity groups are meaningless if you don't have several hosts.
2017-10-20 16:19 GMT+07:00 Jevgeni Zolotarjov :
> I could successfully cre
I could successfully create and run an instance with prepared Compute
offering. But when I try to add one more instance of the same Compute
offering, I am getting an error.
Unable to create a deployment for VM
There are plenty of resources on host: cores, RAM, storage.
Pleas help
management-serv
Ok, answering myself about "sync" / "async" and other stuff (default
rsize/wsize): It comes from server after negotiation.
But still the question how to deal with rsize/wsize and cloudstack agent
mount...
2017-10-20 14:57 GMT+07:00 Ivan Kudryavtsev :
> Hello, Eric.
>
> Thanks for your very compr
Hello, Eric.
Thanks for your very comprehensive answer. I believe it's great it'll be in
archives for future users. I haven't decided how to go completely, but have
several questions here.
You mentioned:
> 10.100.255.3:/storage/primary3 on /mnt/0ab13de9-2310-334c-b438-94dfb0b8ec84
type nfs4 (rw,
Okay. So:
1) Don't use EXT4 with LVM/RAID, it performs terribly with QCOW2. Use XFS.
2) I didn't do anything to my NFS mount options and they came out fine:
10.100.255.3:/storage/primary3 on /mnt/0ab13de9-2310-334c-b438-94dfb0b8ec84
type nfs4
(rw,relatime,sync,vers=4.0,rsize=1048576,wsize=1048
Adeel,
Take a look at the admin guide -
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-administration/en/4.9/networking_and_traffic.html#egress-fw-rules
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
Cloud Architect
ShapeBlue
On 19/10/2017, 20:56, "Rafael Weingärtner" wrote:
This process of enabling ingr
19 matches
Mail list logo
