Re: AW: KVM storage cluster

Hi, Swen. Do you test with direct or cached ops or buffered ones? Is it a write test or rw with certain rw percenrage? Hardly believe the deployment can do 250k IOs for writting with single VM test. 2 февр. 2018 г. 4:56 пользователь "S. Brüseke - proIO GmbH" < s.brues...@proio.com> написал: I am

Re: Intel meltdown/spectre kvm upgrade results

Hi, I don't see spontaneous reboots yet, but have heard that some people met them with new intel ucode. 2 февр. 2018 г. 3:53 пользователь "Andrija Panic" написал: > Thx Ivan for sharing, no reboot issues because of problematic Intel > microcode ? > > This is just Meltdown fix for now, and btw c

[fosdem] Anybody going to Fosdem this weekend?

Hi all, I will be at Fosdem in Brussels this weekend, and I know Daan is going to be there too - if you're going it would be lovely to meet you and discuss CloudStack among other things, tweet me @rhtyd. Cheers. rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblue.com 53 Chandos Place, Covent Garden, Lond

AW: KVM storage cluster

I am also testing with ScaleIO on CentOS7 with KVM. With a 3 node cluster with each node has 2x 2TB SSD (Samsung PM1663a) I get 250.000 IOPS when doing a fio test (random 4k). The only problem is that I do not know how to mount the shared volume so that KVM can use it to store vms on it. Does an

Re: KVM storage cluster

a bit late, but: - for any IO heavy (medium even...) workload, try to avoid CEPH, no offence, simply it takes lot of $$$ to make CEPH perform in random IO worlds (imagine RHEL and vendors provide only refernce architecutre with SEQUNATIAL benchmark workload, not random) - not to mention a huge lis

Re: Intel meltdown/spectre kvm upgrade results

Thx Ivan for sharing, no reboot issues because of problematic Intel microcode ? This is just Meltdown fix for now, and btw congrats on courage to do so this early (since no final solution yet). FYI, CentOS/RHEL has already patched everyhing (kernel and qemu/libvirt) but we are also on Ubuntu..

Re: External DNS

in our VMs in reslolv.conf we have internal IP address of VR as first nameserver, then the public ones... ( use.external.dns set to false on Zone level - zone level settings) On 1 February 2018 at 21:16, wrote: > Hello, > > we are using advanced networking > > > > Andrija Panic писал 2018-02-0

Re: kvm live volume migration

Actually, we have this feature (we call this internally online-storage-migration) to migrate volume from CEPH/NFS to SolidFire (thanks to Mike Tutkowski) There is libvirt mechanism, where basically you start another PAUSED VM on another host (same name and same XML file, except the storage volume

Re: External DNS

Hello, we are using advanced networking Andrija Panic писал 2018-02-01 23:25: Hi, you didn't write what kind of networking you have, are VMs supposed to use VR (advanced networking) for DNS (as deafult) or not. In zone settings, we have set public DNS to google's also, and some internal o

Re: External DNS

Hi, you didn't write what kind of networking you have, are VMs supposed to use VR (advanced networking) for DNS (as deafult) or not. In zone settings, we have set public DNS to google's also, and some internal ones. SSVM and CPVM are assinged both 2 internal, and then 2 external servers (in that

Re: Time-out when creating a template from a snapshot

Vladimir, the original error seems as MySQL timeout for sure (I assume because of HAPROXY in the middle), and we also had this setup originally (MGMT server using HAPROXY on top of galera nodes...) but this has confirmed to be issue, no matter what we changed on HAproxy or Mysql, and at that time

FW: Apache EU Roadshow 2018 in Berlin

Hi Everyone, I’m cross-posting again… I think that it would be great if we could have a couple of CloudStack presentations, but maybe we could pool a user’s story with development piece to showcase CloudStack from both perspectives. Any one up for this? paul.an...@shapeblue.com  www.shapeblu

Re: Time-out when creating a template from a snapshot

Thanks a lot, any help will be so much appreciated! On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 05:23:25PM +, Nux! wrote: > It's possible there are timeouts being hit somewhere. I'd take this to dev@ > to be honest, I am not very familiar with the ssvm internals. > > -- > Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg

Re: Time-out when creating a template from a snapshot

No, the primary storage is local (in this case), but the primary storage isn't being involved, as I'm creating a template from a snapshot which resides on a secondary storage. The snapshot's size is ~300GB. On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 06:18:43PM +, Simon Weller wrote: > Is your primary storage