Hi Wido
The issue solved . Need to configure ra in router vlan. Previously we
set "ipv6 nd ra suppress" , for other systems to work, after change to
Cloudstack, it need to remove this and make it have announcement of IPv6 to
VM.
By the way, This way of configuring IPv6, if IPv6 need to chan
Can you check with tcpdump on the host and sniff the vnetX device of the
VM to see if you ICMPv6 packages reach the VM?
Security Grouping with IPv6 works with KVM, so it has to be a
configuration issue somewhere.
Wido
On 4/30/21 8:59 PM, Hean Seng wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am using 4.15 , hypervisor is
-1 (non-binding)
(even though I'm a PMC member - I believe I have the right to cast a
non-binding vote? Otherwise I would change it to 0)
Explanation:
While I do know where this comes from, and while my following comment has
NOTHING to do with the person who raised it (my own colleague who I
app
Hi
I am using 4.15 , hypervisor is ubuntu 18 , KVM , yes, I am on advance with
SG
I set the Security Group:
ICMP
-1 -1 ::/0
But seems still cannot ping the VM.
Or even add in rules for ALL
All . All ::/0
Seems not able to PING.
After configure , this is the rules in ip6
Hi Hean,
What version of CloudStack are you using?
KVM does support IPv6 indeed when deploying Advanced Networking with
Security Groups (SG) enabled.
It should work fine. The only difference regarding setting IPv4 rules for
SG is that the CIDR list is an IPv6 CIDR (e.g. cidrlist="::/0", instead o
+1, -1, and +0:
Overall idea: +1 (Agree with Rene regarding context being important,
too.)
Some specific pull requests: -1 or 0:
-1: How is this related? It seems to be a commit that shouldn't
have been a part of this pull request since it is a brand new file that
is unrelated:
ht
We using share network, on Security Group, KVM .
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 6:28 PM Alex Mattioli
wrote:
> Hi Hean,
>
> What type of network and hypervisor are you using? Also, which version of
> ACS?
>
> Regards,
> Alex
>
>
>
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Hean Seng
> Sent: 30 April 20
+1 (binding)
Regards.
From: Gabriel Bräscher
Sent: Friday, April 30, 2021 18:31
To: dev
Cc: priv...@cloudstack.apache.org ;
users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Renaming default git branch name from 'master' to 'main'
and replace offensive words a
+1 (binding)
Em sex., 30 de abr. de 2021 às 08:51, Daan Hoogland
escreveu:
> +1 (binding, Though I'm not sure if this is not a regular lazy consensus
> vote)
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 1:43 PM Suresh Anaparti <
> suresh.anapa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Following the discussi
+1 (binding)
Em sex., 30 de abr. de 2021 às 08:51, Daan Hoogland
escreveu:
> +1 (binding, Though I'm not sure if this is not a regular lazy consensus
> vote)
>
> On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 1:43 PM Suresh Anaparti <
> suresh.anapa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi All,
> >
> > Following the discussi
+1 (binding, Though I'm not sure if this is not a regular lazy consensus
vote)
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 1:43 PM Suresh Anaparti <
suresh.anapa...@shapeblue.com> wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Following the discussion thread on renaming default git branch name and
> inclusiveness [1], I would like to start a
+1 (non-binding)
While context is important and "master" has many meanings, I am not
offended when we switch from "master" to "main" in favor of political
correctness.
Hi All,
Following the discussion thread on renaming default git branch name and
inclusiveness [1], I would like to start a vote to gather consensus on the
following plan:
1. Accept the following rename PRs (raised against 'master' branch) which
renames git default branch to 'main' and replaces
Hi Hean,
What type of network and hypervisor are you using? Also, which version of ACS?
Regards,
Alex
-Original Message-
From: Hean Seng
Sent: 30 April 2021 08:34
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: IPv6 Issue in Cloudstack
Hi
I setup the IPv6 in VM. Outbound form VM is no
+1 for the LDAP ones, especially.
Thanks,
-Nathan McGarvey
On 4/29/21 5:28 AM, David Jumani wrote:
> Thanks for adding them to the issue Nicolas.
> Inviting others to pitch in with the features they use which are missing in
> the new UI so we can take a call on whether to implement them.
>
15 matches
Mail list logo