Re: Secondary storage doesn't work

2021-07-19 Thread Andy Nguyen
The host value has the correct IP so I didn't make any changes there. I did some Googling and found someone mentioning uploading need to happen over https rather than http, so I switched to https, still no luck. Checking the log, it says something about unable to find matched VM for management VM

Cloudstack quota, billing, usage_discriminator... How the Usage, or Quata plugin, makes the calculation?

2021-07-19 Thread Kalil de Albuquerque Carvalho
Hello all. I'm trying to test the Usage, or Quota Plugin, to take values and make billing with the CloudStack that we are testing here, in my company. I do not understand how it makes the count. I needed to change the values directly on da data base, so I'm not sure if it is the best plate to

Re: [PROPOSE] RM for 4.16

2021-07-19 Thread Nicolas Vazquez
Thank you for your support. Please find the proposed timeline below for discussion: 4.16.0.0 release - target for end Q3 2021 (6 weeks) Ongoing - End of August 2021: accept all bugs, issues, improvements allowed in LTS [1] (2 weeks) Mid-September 2021: accept only critical/blocker fixes (1 week)

Re: Error while starting VM ID ###

2021-07-19 Thread Paul Lima
Hi Vivek, Tailed the managerment log and it shows 2 errors that are related with the creation of new VMs SR_BACKEND_FAILURE_202 and StoragePool is in avoid set, skipping pool. Not too sure if both are related though. On 2021/07/19 11:06:02, Vivek Kumar wrote: > Hello, > > You should probably

Re: Scale Running VM.

2021-07-19 Thread Harikrishna Patnala
If you got till here I believe you have already enabled global setting and marked the template as dynamically scalable. Please check if host license supports dynamic scaling or not. In the host license view on xenserver you can check that using "restrict_dmc" flag. If it is set to true then dyn

Re: XCP-ng 8.2 cannot start vm more than 4 core

2021-07-19 Thread Abishek
I am very grateful for your response. I have used the following deployment scenario. 2 host with XCP-ng 8.2 1st host has 2CPU socket each of 24 core (96vCPU) 2nd host has 2CPU socket each of 6 core (24 vCPU) The value "xen.vm.vcpu.max" is currently set to 16. And the dynamic scale for template

Re: XCP-ng 8.2 cannot start vm more than 4 core

2021-07-19 Thread Harikrishna Patnala
Hi, I just saw the other email thread. Yes, you can try disabling the dynamic scaling and then try deploying and start the VM. But I also see you are testing dynamic scale VM, in that case, please check my previous reply, Regards, Harikrishna From: Harikrishna

Re: Error while starting VM ID ###

2021-07-19 Thread Vivek Kumar
Hello, You should probably look management-server.log, it will give you more clarity why it’s is failing. Regards, Vivek Kumar > On 19-Jul-2021, at 4:32 PM, Poco Loco wrote: > > Hello everyone - I am experiencing a weird issue with my Cloudstack install > v4.15, the Primary storage appears

Error while starting VM ID ###

2021-07-19 Thread Poco Loco
Hello everyone - I am experiencing a weird issue with my Cloudstack install v4.15, the Primary storage appears to have 52.71% allocated but all new VMs are failing as the ROOT/Data disks are not being created properly then the deployment fails. I am relatively new using cloudstack on a homelab

Re: XCP-ng 8.2 cannot start vm more than 4 core

2021-07-19 Thread Harikrishna Patnala
Hi Abhishek, There is a global setting "xen.vm.vcpu.max" which can be configured to the desired value. But I think hosts in the cluster should also have the required number of CPU sockets. The minimum of CPU sockets numbers of the hosts in the cluster will be assigned to the VPCUs-max. I rememb

Re: IPV6 in Isolated/VPC networks

2021-07-19 Thread Wido den Hollander
Op 17-07-2021 om 06:28 schreef Hean Seng: I think if doing this way , since you were to implement on peering ip between vr and phsical router , then would need keep /56 or 48 at Clodustack ? We can only add /64 subnet to Cloudstack only (instead of keep the /56 or 48 there). We can have a

Re: Issue in staring vm above 4 Cores.

2021-07-19 Thread Vivek Kumar
Hello Abhishesk, Is "dynamically scalable" selected in your template ? Try to disable it and then try to provision with higher number of CPU and see. Regards, Vivek Kumar > On 18-Jul-2021, at 1:30 PM, Abishek wrote: > > Hello everyone, > > I am facing trouble in starting vm above 4 cores i

XCP-ng 8.2 cannot start vm more than 4 core

2021-07-19 Thread Abishek
Hello EveryOne, I am deployed XCP-ng 8.2 host with cloudstack 4.15.1. Every thing is sucessfully setup with 2 XCP-ng host. But I am facing a problem while deploying a vm greater than 4 cores. Every time I try to start a VM with more than 4 cores I get the error VCPUs-at-startup, 5, value greate

Issue in staring vm above 4 Cores.

2021-07-19 Thread Abishek
Hello everyone, I am facing trouble in starting vm above 4 cores in XCP-ng 8.2 with cloudstack 4.15.1. I receive the following error: nameLabel: Async.VM.start_on nameDescription: allowedOperations: [] currentOperations: {} created: Sun Jul 18 13:26:27 NPT 2021

Scale Running VM.

2021-07-19 Thread Abishek
Hello EveryOne, Is it possible to scale a running vm with host XCP-ng 8.2 and cloudstack 4.15.1. I am testing it for production enviromnment. I tried enabling it but received the following error: Caused by: com.cloud.utils.exception.CloudRuntimeException: Unable to scale vm due to Catch excepti

Re: Secondary storage doesn't work

2021-07-19 Thread Darrin Hüsselmann
Hi Andy, No worries, have a look at what is set in the global variable "host". You can find global variables by going to Configuration -> Global Settings. You can use the search field to narrow down the options. If you must make a change there, try destroying the system VMs after changing the s