Wei is it possible to do the same with XCP as hypervisor?
*Francisco Arencibia Quesada.*
*DevOps Engineer*
On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 at 18:22, Francisco Arencibia Quesada <
arencibia.franci...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Thanks so much Wei, this worked like a charm
>
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2024 at 5:22 PM Wei
So I can create an account in a domain and have it go to a SAML IDP, and any
users under that account will have to authenticate to that SAML IDP?
Would the user put in the domain when logging in like normal, or would this
change the login to having a SAML/SSO button?
From: Rohit Yadav
Date:
Hi Marty,
Yes, the SAML authorised accounts can be on per-account/user basis to different
SAML IDPs. We don't support linking/restricting SAML IDP or IDPs on domain
basis though.
Regards.
From: Marty Godsey
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2024 01:02
To:
from the code
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/cb9b3134f7fff972b63d8565a4d021f8ea918903/engine/schema/src/main/java/com/cloud/network/dao/NetworkDaoImpl.java#L464
it looks like either broadcast_uri of a network or vnet of a record
op_dc_vnet_alloc is null or unsupported.
can you share
@Wei ZHOU any thoughts ?
On Thu, Jun 13, 2024 at 9:29 PM Curious Pandora wrote:
> There are indeed 4 networks with NULL broadcast_uri that are causing the
> problem. I think those are systemic for cloudstack.
> +-+-+---+
> | id | name
Hello,
I think there is no way to make this work from cloudstack.
However, in case you are using openvswitch on your hosts you could try to
create a mirror there for egress, ingress or both
Let's say the vm machine port is vnet10.
Something like this could work for you:
# Add an internal port
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from
KVM to SSVM public and private ip address
> @weizhouapache So cloudstack could'nt work with single ip range ?
>
There may be some issues with vm console and ssvm (download template/volume,
etc).
Everything else
GitHub user dominar250 added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from KVM
to SSVM public and private ip address
@weizhouapache Thanks for the suggestion. Is it a good idea to run management,
KVM, and NFS on a single machine? Does this setup cause routing-related issues?
My plan is to
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from
KVM to SSVM public and private ip address
sounds good @dominar250 , but still a separate ip range for the host and for
the SVMs (and VMs in general) is best.
GitHub link:
GitHub user dominar250 added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from KVM
to SSVM public and private ip address
@weizhouapache So cloudstack could'nt work with single ip range ?
GitHub link:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/discussions/9254#discussioncomment-9772467
This is
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from
KVM to SSVM public and private ip address
> @DaanHoogland Thanks for addressing this issue. From SSVM/consoleproxy i can
> able to ping my kvm machine and management server which is stable . But I
> can't get
GitHub user dominar250 added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from KVM
to SSVM public and private ip address
@DaanHoogland
root@s-55-VM:~# ip a
1: lo: mtu 65536 qdisc noqueue state UNKNOWN group
default qlen 1000
link/loopback 00:00:00:00:00:00 brd 00:00:00:00:00:00
inet
GitHub user weizhouapache added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from
KVM to SSVM public and private ip address
@dominar250
I think it is because your systemvm have two nics/ips in the same range
typically the public and private should use different ip range and vlan/vni.
GitHub
GitHub user dominar250 added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from KVM
to SSVM public and private ip address
[system_vm-ip.txt](https://github.com/user-attachments/files/15823200/system_vm-ip.txt)
GitHub link:
GitHub user dominar250 added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from KVM
to SSVM public and private ip address
@DaanHoogland Thanks for addressing this issue. From SSVM/consoleproxy i can
able to ping my kvm machine and management server which is stable . But I can't
get constant ping
GitHub user DaanHoogland added a comment to the discussion: packet loss from
KVM to SSVM public and private ip address
@dominar250 I cleanup the description a bit, please let me know if i messed it
up. I do not understand your full scenario yet. you are pinging the console
proxy but that
GitHub user boring-cyborg[bot] added a comment to the discussion: packet loss
from KVM to SSVM public and private ip address
Thanks for opening your first issue here! Be sure to follow the issue template!
GitHub link:
Hi Khang,
I think you can use a L2 network for your use, but you will need to either
manually assign IPs to VMs or have a DHCP which works for your L2 network.
Thanks & Regards
Nischal
On Fri, Jun 14, 2024 at 12:45 PM Khang Nguyen Phuc
wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I want to assign a public
Hello everyone,
I want to assign a public IP directly from the "Public Network" to a VM
(similar to how CloudStack assigns to systemVM or vRouter). It seems like a
shared network is what I'm looking for. I tried creating a Shared Network
from the Public Network, but the Shared Network requires a
Hello,
Is there a way to mirror my packet to another VM in CloudStack. On VMware,
we do have a port mirror option on vSwitch so that I can mirror my packet
to another VM for some debug purposes. As my test and development are all
running on the same cloudstack KVM, I won't be able to do a port
20 matches
Mail list logo
