@shapeblue.com> escreveu:
> >>
> >>> + Gabriel, Wido
> >>>
> >>> Hi Christoffer, thanks for reporting.
> >>>
> >>> Gabriel, Wido - can you please check and fix. Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>&
Hi all,
Trying for the last few days to install the cloudstack-agent on a poc host,
however Ubuntu throws a checksum mismatch when using the repository..
Get:1 http://download.cloudstack.org/ubuntu bionic/4.13 all
cloudstack-common all 4.13.0.0~bionic [55.2 MB]
Err:1
Hello,
ZFS is unfortunately not supported, otherwise I would have recommended
that. But if you are going local systems (no nfs/iscsi), ext4 would be the
way to go.
On Mon, Jul 15, 2019 at 1:23 PM Ivan Kudryavtsev
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> if you use local fs, use just ext4 over the required disk
Most people forget that it’s not the sequential performance that counts.. it’s
the 4K random performance and even for NVMe-SSD’s, a redundant 10G connection
between the hosts will be absolutely sufficient.
However split it up in pairs so the one pair takes care of ceph/vsan, the other
of the
Hi all,
I am using openvswitch for my hypervisors and I found this article:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/networking/ovs-plugin.html
Is this still used? When I look in the providers table, I do not see the
Ovs plugin, whether I choose GRE or VLAN as the isolation type for the
Dag Sonstebo
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi Christopher,
> > >
> > > I think we discussed my KVM networking blog post in an earlier
> > thread so I assume you’ve had a read of that – I’m about to revisit this
> > an
t.
>
> Wrt immediate fix – have you tried simply manually creating the cloud0 bridge
> and just bring it up on bootup? Is this picked up by VMs?
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> On 04/07/2018, 08:42, "Christoffer Pedersen&q
; I vaguely remember that cloud0 were lazy provisioned/started... did you
> start VR on that host, does it trigger cloud0 creation ?
>
> Cheers
>
> On Tue, 3 Jul 2018 at 16:34, Christoffer Pedersen wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> >
> > Currently doing some POC'ing in a
Hi all,
Currently doing some POC'ing in a nested environment. Running the latest
4.11.1 with Ubuntu 16.04 LTS. I am using openvswitch to connect the
networks.
So far everything has worked much better than the 4.11 where I had
countless of issues. However, after rebooting my hypervisor, the
Hi Jon,
I would suppose that several people/providers run guest and public networks
together. I was also confused in the start about the cloudstack networking.
1. I guess you can, the traffic will be separated by VLAN’s.
2. When defining a public range, in my experience you have to assign a
stem to get going once I have created a VPC.
>
> =>>> Minutes yes, hours no. Going by your previous posts I would guess you
> still have some tuning up to do and possibly run on low spec hardware
> though?
>
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> Shap
rkive.com/qsKmnsa4/
> patchviasocket-seems-to-be-broken-with-qemu-2-3
>
>
>
> -Message d'origine-
> De : Christoffer Pedersen [mailto:v...@vrod.dk]
> Envoyé : mardi 12 juin 2018 19:17
> À : users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Objet : Re: SSVM's not starting, timeout for libvirt
think the default is set pretty low.
>
> Best,
> James
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2018 at 11:10 AM, Christoffer Pedersen
> wrote:
>
> > Just want to update that I still get the ISO error:
> >
> > 2018-06-12 17:09:42,194 INFO [c.c.t.HypervisorTemplateAdapter]
> >
, 2018 at 5:07 PM, Christoffer Pedersen wrote:
> Hi Dag,
>
> Yes, I altered the IP addresses as I do not fancy throwing them out on the
> public net. If you think they have value to the troubleshooting, I can send
> you the original logdata directly. I configured the netw
De : Ivan Kudryavtsev
> Envoyé : mardi 12 juin 2018 13:59:39
> À : users
> Objet : Re: SSVM's not starting, timeout for libvirt python script in
> agent.log
>
> Increasing command timeouts in global parameters can work here. At
> least I
> met similar behav
gt; Nicolas Bouige
> DIMSI
> cloud.dimsi.fr<http://www.cloud.dimsi.fr>
> 4, avenue Laurent Cely
> Tour d’Asnière – 92600 Asnière sur Seine
> T/ +33 (0)6 28 98 53 40
>
>
> ____
> De : Christoffer Pedersen
> Envoyé : mardi 12 juin 2018 12:30
Hi all,
I have an issue regarding the system VMs. After deploying an advanced zone,
the system VMs are trying to be created but gets stuck in a "Starting"
state, however the Agent state is "Up". I have these logs in the agent.log
(sorry for the formatting)
2018-06-12 12:22:06,354 WARN
PM, Christoffer Pedersen wrote:
> Hi Dag,
>
> I did run the cloudstack-setup-management afterwards, yes. After running
> this command, it worked. I then rebooted the server itself and after that I
> cannot get it to work anymore.
>
> Thank you,
> Chris
>
> Sent from
> Hei Christoffer,
>
> Did you run “cloudstack-setup-management” after database setup or did you
> just start the services?
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
> On 08/06/2018, 12:10, "Christoffer Pedersen" wrote:
>
>Hi a
Hi all,
I am trying to test out the Cloudstack 4.11 solution in my lab. I am
currently at the management server stage, following this guide:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/projects/cloudstack-installation/en/4.11/management-server/
Now, the installation and such goes without a hitch: I add
20 matches
Mail list logo
