use local storage?
>
> Somesh
> CloudPlatform Escalations
> Citrix Systems, Inc.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 18, 2015 10:20 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: More disk space for pr
et for "system.vm.use.local.storage" and "Local storage enabled".
> Of course, you need compute offering using local storage as well.
>
> Somesh
> CloudPlatform Escalations
> Citrix Systems, Inc.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Dong [mailto:dong
ge enabled" flag set to for the
> Zone where the KVM hosts reside?
>
> Somesh
> CloudPlatform Escalations
> Citrix Systems, Inc.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, March 16, 2015 11:08 AM
> To: users@cl
Hi, All,
I found a weird situation here:
1. My cloudstack cluster contains 1 Management Server+7KVM Hypervisor
nodes.
2. 1TB disk is allocated to primary storage on Management Server.
3. Each KVM Hypervisor has 4TB disk space, no manual disk partitions on it.
4. system.vm.use.local.storage=true
5.
.
> > /dev/sda is your root partition right and what is this /dev/vda?
> >
> > Please refer blow link : I have used below link to resize my root
> > partition .
> >
> >
> http://www.rootusers.com/how-to-increase-the-size-of-a-linux-lvm-by-adding-a-new-dis
e of the developers might confirm...we had
> discussion about weather CS will also resize partition and FS - which is I
> guess not the case...
>
> On 13 March 2015 at 16:36, Dan Dong wrote:
>
> > Hi, All,
> > I found when I create a new VM from a template, no matter how
Hi, All,
I found when I create a new VM from a template, no matter how I set disk
offering, the created new VM always has the same original size. For
Example, although I specified 100GB of hard disk,
the actual disk size remains ~20GB, which should come with the template
itself:
name = Large
id
; As the name vm-10 is like vm-1, you are getting the result of vm-10 as
> well.
>
> You can try with UUID of the vm which gives you exact vm details you want,
>
> http://localhost:8080/client/api?command=listVirtualMachines&id=11b7032d-4c03-4fc0-a394-71d921c1e3ba
>
>
> Tha
Hi,
I found when I try to list details of the VM with name vm-1 by:
list virtualmachines name=vm-1
Cloudstack will also return me with info of another VM machine of vm-10, so
I got 2 VMs info here.
How to avoid this? Thanks.
Cheers,
Dan
confirm we are talking about Root volumes and not Data
> Volumes
>
> Regards
>
> Geoff Higginbottom
>
> D: +44 20 3603 0542 | S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Dong [mailt
Thank you all. It works!
Cheers,
Dan
2015-02-03 2:19 GMT-06:00 Sebastien Goasguen :
> I think the ubuntu vm at:
>
> http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/ubuntu/vanilla/14.04/x86_64/
>
> are setup with cloud-init…so you will be set.
>
> On Feb 2, 2015, at 5:11 PM, Dan Dong wrot
Hi,
I'm trying to configure VM login by SSH Key pair Authentication instead
of usrename/password on Ubuntu14.04. I'm following the document as:
http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/virtual_machines.html
The main part is under "Creating an Instance Template that Supports SSH
+44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447968161581
>
> geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
> Sent: 02 February 2015 16:12
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Force cleaning primary storage.
>
> Hi, All,
>
Hi, All,
I found the primary storages are keep decreasing after I create and then
destroy VMs. Although the VMs are destroyed and expunged, their occupation
on primary storage seems never been released( even after weeks).
Is there a way to force releasing the disk space after a VM has been
destro
ll list all possible options you have.
>
> HTH
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Dan Dong"
> > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> &
Hi,
When I tried to deploy a new instance by cloudmonkey CLI for a customized
disk size, e.g 50GB,
how to specify the disk size?
> deploy virtualmachine ... diskofferingid= ...
Error 431: This disk offering requires a custom size specified
Cheers,
Dan
Hi, All,
Thanks for all the info, by recreating the template following the
document, now the newly created VMs have their IP addresses set
automatically, but the hostname still keeps the hostname of the VM from
which template is created. For CentOS, the hostname is set in the file
/etc/sysconfig
Hi,
I found that when I create new instances from template of my own( a
centos OS), the IP address
and hostname are not set to the VM automatically, you have to login to the
VM from the UI and set them manually, then a restart will get them take
effect. Does anybody else observe the same issue?
Exactly, thanks Erik!
Cheers,
Dan
2015-01-22 12:46 GMT-06:00 Erik Weber :
> If I recall correctly you'll solve that by upgrading the 'requests' python
> package.
>
> Erik
>
> Den torsdag 22. januar 2015 skrev Dan Dong følgende:
>
> > Hi,
> >
Hi,
When I tried to install cloudmonkey following:
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/CloudStack+cloudmonkey+CLI#CloudStackcloudmonkeyCLI-Usingasacommandlinetool
I found this error when running the command:
# cloudmonkey
Import error in cloudmonkey.cloudmonkey : No module nam
Hi, All,
After create a few VMs on my KVM hosts, I found they could not see each
other although they are in the same subnet of 192.168.0.*. The route on
each of the VM is the same as:
Destination Gateway Genmask Flags Metric RefUse
Iface
0.0.0.0 192.168.0.1 0.
finity groups,
> and provide MS log output...
>
> On 2 December 2014 at 00:45, Dan Dong wrote:
>
> > Hi, All,
> > When I tried to create more than 2 VMs on my 2 KVM hosts, it failed
> > by "Unable
> > to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-17-VM], Please ch
Hi, All,
When I tried to create more than 2 VMs on my 2 KVM hosts, it failed
by "Unable
to create a deployment for VM[User|i-2-17-VM], Please check the affinity
groups provided, there may not be sufficient capacity to follow them". But
each KVM host has 24 cores, 48GB RAM and 8TB of disk, the ins
le if you still
> have difficulties with it.
>
> Regards,
>
> Vadim.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2014 12:00 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: To let SSVM reach out
still have a chance to loose your changes after reboot, because routing
> table is created dynamically.
>
>Fix you network and I believe everything will work out-of-the box.
>
> Regards,
>
> Vadim.
>
>
> From: Dan Do
>
> I do expect you put the output of route and arp here otherwise we will
> continue guessing.
>
> It would be even better if you describe your network layout like on the
> first picture here:
> http://cloudstack-administration.readthedocs.org/en/latest/networking_and
correctly? Does it have 2
> interfaces like in the setup guide? Does your hypervisor have access to
> internet to be able to download template?
>
> Vadim.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Monday, November 17, 2014 7:02 PM
>
Hi, All,
I found I could not register my ISO image to the cloudstack( through URL
of http://releases.ubuntu.com/14.04.1/ubuntu-14.04.1-server-amd64.iso). The
SSVM is running and health check show no problems on it. But it just could
not see the outside network, although SSVM is on the same networ
groups, so make sure your security groups will allow VMs to get in touch,
> if that's what you wish.
>
> HTH
> Lucian
>
> --
> Sent from the Delta quadrant using Borg technology!
>
> Nux!
> www.nux.ro
>
> - Original Message -
> > From: "Dan Don
Hi, All,
I have a question on basic network configuration of cloudstack:
1. The Management Server-->192.168.0.100
2. One KVM host--> 192.168.0.101
3. System VMs--> 192.168.0.110-192.168.0.120
3. The guest VMs-->192.168.0.150-192.168.0.250
That is, they are all in the same network of 192.168.0.0/
ble indeed. It is
> better to have differen LAN-s (VLANs) and partition the network properly.
> External L2/L3 switch is also a requirement.
>
> Vadim.
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 1:24 AM
> T
outside.
Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Dan
2014-11-11 10:29 GMT-06:00 Dan Dong :
> Hi, All,
> When debugging why my SSVM could not access outside, I see the following
> route table on SSVM:
> root@s-1-VM:~# ip route show
> 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link s
Hi, All,
When debugging why my SSVM could not access outside, I see the following
route table on SSVM:
root@s-1-VM:~# ip route show
169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link src 169.254.1.47
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth1 proto kernel scope link src 192.168.0.22
192.168.0.0/24 dev eth2 pr
https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/CLOUDSTACK/SSVM,+templates,+Secondary+storage+troubleshooting
>
> ~Rajani
>
> On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 5:04 AM, Dan Dong wrote:
>
> > Some more info, on SSVM I can see the following routes, there is route
> > there, so why SSV
192.168.0.25
2014-11-10 15:12 GMT-06:00 Dan Dong :
> Hi, All,
> When debugging why my ISOs could not be registered, I found when I
> logged into SSVM, I could not even ping the Management Server, although
> they are both in the 192.168.0.0/24 network, so of course could not ping
>
Hi, All,
When debugging why my ISOs could not be registered, I found when I logged
into SSVM, I could not even ping the Management Server, although they are
both in the 192.168.0.0/24 network, so of course could not ping outside
world. Here are my simple network settings of my cloud(1Management S
gt;
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, November 08, 2014 2:32 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Network setup questions.
>
> Hi, all,
> I have a simple network setup in my cloud as:
> 1. Management server
Hi, all,
I have a simple network setup in my cloud as:
1. Management server have 2 NICs:
em2 pointing outside with 10.0.0.100/24
em1 pointing inside with 192.168.0.100/24 (also serves as DNS
and Gateway of the cloud)
2. One KVM hypervisor which has 1 NIC: em1 with 192.168.0.
t; Jessica
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 3:16 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Could not open Management UI after global setting change.
>
> Hi, Jessica,
> Yes, I used
68.1.0/24' where
> name='secstorage.allowed.internal.sites';
>
>
>
> Jessica
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2014 2:41 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Could not open Management
nagement UI after global setting change.
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Dan Dong wrote:
>
> > Hi, Experts,
> > When I modified the global settings for
> > "secstorage.allowed.internal.sites"
> > to a different network parameter, I found I could no
on for the right syntax to use
near '"secstorage.allowed.internal.sites"="192.168.0.0/24"' at line 1
2014-11-05 16:28 GMT-06:00 Erik Weber :
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Dan Dong wrote:
>
> > Hi, Experts,
> > When I modified the global
Hi, Experts,
When I modified the global settings for "secstorage.allowed.internal.sites"
to a different network parameter, I found I could not open the
http://localhost:8080/client UI page anymore, so I could not change back to
the original setting again. How to solve this? Where can I find the
c
/mnt/secondary/iso/ubuntu-14.04.1-server-amd64.iso";.
2014-11-04 15:07 GMT-06:00 Dan Dong :
> Hi, All,
> On my ubuntu openstack 4.4, after I registered my iso, the "Ready"
> status is "No", and when I tried to create an instance from this iso, I
> just
Hi, All,
On my ubuntu openstack 4.4, after I registered my iso, the "Ready"
status is "No", and when I tried to create an instance from this iso, I
just could not see it in the "My ISOs" tab, do you know what's the possible
problem? Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Dan
No, I will try to delete it. Thanks Motty.
2014-11-04 10:20 GMT-06:00 motty cruz :
> Dan,
> have you deleted any networks you created?
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Dan Dong wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > When I tried to delete a Zone in the UI, it returns an err
Hi,
When I tried to delete a Zone in the UI, it returns an error as:
"The zone is not deletable because there are physical networks in this zone".
What does this mean and how to delete the Zone?
Cheers,
Dan
aunch secondary vm" (or console vm) probably it thinks it can not launch
> thrm for some reason (you can destroy an ssvm but you cant launch it
> yourself), cs management server log may have the clue about the problem...
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Nov 3, 2014, at 6
Yes, the zone is enabled. How to add a system VM?
2014-11-03 17:29 GMT-06:00 abhisek basu :
> Is the zone enabled? CS should create system vms once zone is enabled.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 4 Nov 2014, at 4:56 am, "Dan Dong" wrote:
> >
> &
Hi, Experts,
After I installed cloudstack and openned the UI, why I could not see any
System VMs(0) under the "Infrastructure" tab? I could add
Zone-Pod-Cluster-Hosts. And the system VM has already been downloaded:
ll /mnt/secondary/template/tmpl/1/3/
total 296048
drwxr-xr-x 2 root root 4096
50 matches
Mail list logo
