mmand,
> /var/cache/cloud/cmdline file in VR also /var/log/cloud.log.
> > These logs helps us to understand where the problem is.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Jayapal
> >
> > On 27-Feb-2015, at 2:54 AM, John Skinner
> wrote:
> >
> >> This happens with a
just try recreating it. If former, then probably have
> to look at /var/log/messages on the router.
>
> Somesh
> CloudPlatform Escalations
> Citrix Systems, Inc.
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Skinner [mailto:john.skin...@appcore.com]
>
wrote:
> Did you check the entries in the nics table for that router? That might
> give you some pointers.
>
> Somesh
> CloudPlatform Escalations
> Citrix Systems, Inc.
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Skinner [mailto:john.skin...@appcore.com]
> Sent: Thursd
Running CloudStack 4.3.2 with advanced networking using Open vSwitch on
KVM. I am having an issue where my virtual router is coming up with 2
public interfaces when there should only be 1. CloudStack is only
requesting the 3 interfaces (private, control, and public) but the VM is
coming up with 4.
management
server when the SSVM starts which explains why they were missing. All better
now!
On Feb 27, 2014, at 8:51 AM, John Skinner wrote:
> New deployment of CloudStack 4.2.1 that was build for nonoss VMware. The
> environment is currently only running KVM, but will have VMware
New deployment of CloudStack 4.2.1 that was build for nonoss VMware. The
environment is currently only running KVM, but will have VMware in the future.
That being said, we deployed the packages with nonoss at build time.
The CPVM starts up fine and works as expected. The SSVM starts up, the GUI
ev
> -Original Message-
> From: John Skinner [mailto:john.skin...@appcore.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, December 04, 2013 12:55 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Unable to execute PrimaryStorageDownloadCommand
>
> Environment running CloudStack 4.1.1 with VMw
Environment running CloudStack 4.1.1 with VMware vSphere 5.1 nodes and NFS
backed Primary Storage data stores. We are currently having issues creating VMs
from a template when we have to copy the template from secondary storage. If
the template already exists on primary storage then the VM gets
After upgrading from CS 2.2.14 to 4.1.1 cloudstack-usage fails to start.
This is the trace from attempting to execute cloudstack-usage start
http://fpaste.org/45521/38134595/
It looks like jsvc is failing to run as the cloud user.
-
From: "John Skinner"
To: "Kirk Kosinski"
Cc: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 1, 2013 9:02:41 AM
Subject: Re: CS 4.1.1 XenServer sysvm iso
Ok - that makes sense.
This is on an environment that we upgraded from 2.2.14 to 4.1.1. It had been
running gre
start it as HVM guest
Is the systevm VM not Debian 5? I am wondering if that is my problem.
- Original Message -
From: "Kirk Kosinski"
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: "John Skinner"
Sent: Monday, September 30, 2013 6:53:31 PM
Subject: Re: CS 4.1.1 XenServer
Hey List,
We are having an issue where system vms (routers, ssvm, console proxy) are
failing to boot. This is with CS 4.1.1, and XenServer 6.1. The VM gets created,
and the sysvm iso gets mounted to the VM, however, the VM fails to boot from
the iso, it just sits there. You can unmount the iso
My problem was some one has changed router.extra.public.nics in global config
from 2 to 5. Once changed back to 2, routers launch just fine.
- Original Message -
From: "John Skinner"
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 3:22:16 PM
Subject: Re:
Ok so here is something interesting. I just destroyed the console proxy system
VM, and it recreated successfully. However, Domain routers will not create.
- Original Message -
From: "John Skinner"
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Wednesday, September 18, 2013 2:08:41
ven
On 9/18/13 9:19 AM, "John Skinner" wrote:
>I'll take a look at that. I am wondering if the problem is it is unable
>to pull the systemvm template. I noticed that the permissions for the
>systemvm .ova file on secondary storage have a different ownership then
&
plate on the vCenter side
has a network associated to it that is not be used by CloudStack and isn't
routable in the network at all... and I am not sure how that happened.
John Skinner
Senior Systems Administrator | Appcore - the business of cloud computing®
Office +1.800.735.71
Yes, however on the console it just comes up with "Operating System Not Found"
error. This is really strange since this was all working fine last week.
John Skinner
Senior Systems Administrator | Appcore - the business of cloud computing®
Office +1.800.735.7104
Direct +1.51
:
java.lang.Exception
Message: Failed to configure VM before start. vmName: r-134-VM
It looks like the last thing it was trying to do is configure the VNC port for
the VM?
- Original Message -
From: "John Skinner"
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Tuesday, September 17, 2013 1
Still working on this. Here is a full trace from vCenter logs. Still unsure
what is going on.
http://fpaste.org/40151/
- Original Message -
From: "John Skinner"
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 6:08:09 PM
Subject: Re: Unable to start D
In global settings there is a setting for cpu over allocation multiplier, that
will allow you to have more allocatable compute resources... I am not sure on
memory however.
- Original Message -
From: "Mir Islam"
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 3:41:45
> faultCause = (vmodl.MethodFault) null,
--> invalidProperty = ,
--> msg = "A specified parameter was not correct.
--> ",
--> }
- Original Message -
From: "John Skinner"
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 16, 2013 3:56:10 PM
Subj
Having an issue getting domain routers to start in a VMware 5.1 environment
with CS 4.1. The fun thing is, this was all working fine last week, and of
course, no one changed anything . Has anyone seen anything like this:
2013-09-16 15:46:16,927 TRACE [vmware.mo.ClusterMO]
(DirectAgent-69:10.
use GlusterFS in the wiki?
On 9/11/13 5:27 PM, "John Skinner" wrote:
>I ran each test independently for each block size.
>
>iozone -I -i 0 -i 1 -i 2 -r 4k -s 1G
>
>In order: -I to specify direct-IO, -i 0 to specify write/rewrite, -i 1 to
>specify read/re-read
ubject: Re: Cloustack 4.1.0 + GlusterFS
I have never used iozone before,
How did you get that report?
I tried: iozone -s 1024m -t 1 -R
But the report was pretty different from yours.
2013/9/11 John Skinner
> I currently have GlusterFS deployed into an 8 node KVM cluster running on
>
I currently have GlusterFS deployed into an 8 node KVM cluster running on
CloudStack 4.1 for primary storage. Gluster is deployed on 28 1TB drives across
2 separate storage appliances using a distributed-replicated volume with the
replica set to 2. The storage network is 10Gb copper.
These are
Awesome. Thank you.
- Original Message -
From: "Ilya Musayev"
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Sent: Monday, September 9, 2013 1:20:09 PM
Subject: RE: VMware DomainRouter
Yes only works for vmware and it worked for me in ACS 4.1
-Original Message-----
From: Jo
So to put the management network on a VLAN on VMware would I just specify a
management network label for example if I wanted VLAN 96: "vSwitch0,96" ?
- Original Message -
From: "John Skinner"
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: "Jayapal Reddy Uradi"
S
Also, is it possible to put the management network on a tagged VLAN? It doesn't
look like it is through the UI, but could I make some database changes to get
cloud to create the nics on the host with a vlan similar to guest networks?
John Skinner
Senior Systems Administrator | Appcore
nd KVM we have link local IP address.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
> On 06-Sep-2013, at 3:46 AM, John Skinner wrote:
>
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I just setup a CloudStack 4.1 environment with vSphere 5.1. Everything seems
>> to be working ok for the mos
I did build from source, and did include the vim25.jar. I have 2 interfaces
that are bonded for all networks with 2 standard vSwitches. I have vSwitch0 for
management and storage, and vSwitch2 for public and guest.
John Skinner
Senior Systems Administrator | Appcore - the business of cloud
Hello list,
I just setup a CloudStack 4.1 environment with vSphere 5.1. Everything seems to
be working ok for the most part. However, I have noticed that my domain routers
are getting created with a management IP address for the control network
instead of a control network IP address (the link
Quick question regarding vSphere and vCenter. I have a customer that is running
version 5.1, however the documentation says 5.0 at the newest. Is 5.1 do-able?
Has any one tested with 5.1 with any success?
Thanks!
uite weird.
On Aug 1, 2013, at 4:54 PM, Chiradeep Vittal
wrote:
> Logs?
>
> On 8/1/13 12:53 PM, "John Skinner" wrote:
>
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Just upgraded my mixed KVM/XenServer environment form 3.0.2 to 4.1. All
>> of my KVM hosts seem happy, but a
Hello all,
Just upgraded my mixed KVM/XenServer environment form 3.0.2 to 4.1. All of my
KVM hosts seem happy, but all of my XenServer (5.6SP2) hosts show as
disconnected and are not coming back. Has anyone experienced this?
I am running CS 3.0.2 and I am running into an issue when trying to create a
new volume from a snapshot, I instantly get an error like this:
2013-06-26 16:47:38,637 DEBUG [cloud.async.AsyncJobManagerImpl]
(Job-Executor-67:job-110824) Executing com.cloud.api.commands.CreateVolumeCmd
for job-1108
ately thereafter. Thank you.
On May 9, 2013, at 10:34 AM, Conrad Geiger wrote:
> That should be fine, I assume the SR has plenty of free space? What SR type?
>
> -Original Message-
> From: John Skinner [mailto:john.skin...@appcore.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013
ertain versions.
>
> -Original Message-----
> From: John Skinner [mailto:john.skin...@appcore.com]
> Sent: Thursday, May 09, 2013 11:03 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: CS 3.0.2 XenServer snapshots not cleaning up
>
> I have a volume that I discovered is no lon
I have a volume that I discovered is no long taking snapshots. It appears that
there are a lot of snapshots in the vdi tree for this vm that have not been
cleaned up. The CS database says that there should only be 1 snapshot for the
volume, but XenServer tells a much different story. How can I
I had this same issue when I attempted to upgrade my production environment
from 3.0.2 to 4.0.2. I could not get the XenServer hosts to connect back, so I
had to end up rolling back to 3.0.2. I haven't been able to get around it.
John Sk
ot;
OVS_OPTIONS="br0 100"
IPADDR="X.X.X.X"
NETMASK="255.255.255.0"
sanbr0
DEVICE="sanbr0"
ONBOOT="yes"
NM_CONTROLLED="no"
BOOTPROTO="static"
TYPE="OVSBridge"
DEVICETYPE="ovs"
40 matches
Mail list logo
