http://pastebin.com/1FyBLheT
/var/log/cloudstack/management/management-server.log
Appreciate your response! Getting desperate!
Many thanks, Noel
> From: noeldkend...@hotmail.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: 4.4.1 upgrade issue - no SSVM, CPVM, Router
> Date: Sat, 6 Dec 2014 18:57:4
I recently attempted an upgrade from 4.2.0 to 4.4.1 and in the process,
mytemplates were not properly updated. I have the templates now,but SSVM and
CPVM are gone.Have been looking through the source to see under what
conditions,and where/how the SSVM is created once gone.I would appreciate a
h
t (not reboot) the router from the Admin GUI.
>
> On 9/16/13 5:26 AM, "Noel Kendall" wrote:
>
> >Jayapal, I did a ping test and traced as you suggested. tcpdump
> >monitoring was done on the public facing interface of the VR.
> >From within the VR, ping to public
t; Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2013 18:00:29 +
>
> Suggest that you stop and start (not reboot) the router from the Admin GUI.
>
> On 9/16/13 5:26 AM, "Noel Kendall" wrote:
>
> >Jayapal, I did a ping test and traced as you suggested. tcpdump
> >monitoring was done
.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
>
> On 16-Sep-2013, at 2:30 AM, Noel Kendall wrote:
>
> > No other NAT. There is nothing but copper between the KVM host machine and
> > the ISP router.There is an L2/L3 switch that the packets travel through.
> > However, t
ing out and
> From the guest VM when you access public n/w observe on VR with what source
> ip the packet is going out.
> In later case I think the source ip address is different.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
>
> On 16-Sep-2013, at 2:30 AM, Noel Kendall wrote:
>
atleast get into that
> interface. Do you have any upstream devices providing NAT? Or any other VR
> with the issue?
>
> It may be worth recreating the VR, by stopping and destroying it and
> creating another guest to start a fresh.
>
> Marty
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 1
er: Does the traffic come back on the public interface? and
> then onto the Guest interface?
>
> Thanks,
> Marty
>
>
> On Sun, Sep 15, 2013 at 2:05 PM, Noel Kendall wrote:
>
> > Indeed, yes, a wget executed on the VR to a public website works just fine.
> > N
come back on the public interface? and then onto the Guest
> interface?
>
> Does a wget on the VR work?
>
> Marty
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 8:19 PM, Noel Kendall wrote:
>
> > I have that Marty. I see the http outbound request coming in on the guest
> >
@gmail.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>
> Hi Noel,
>
> Can you run a tcpdump on both VR interfaces, this should make it apparent
> what is happening?
>
> Thanks,
> Marty
>
>
> On Sat, Sep 14, 2013 at 6:41 PM, Noel Kendall wrote:
>
> >
ate: Sat, 14 Sep 2013 17:25:14 +0100
> > > Subject: Re: Advanced Network - SNAT not working
> > > From: msweet@gmail.com
> > > To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > >
> > > Hi Noel,
> > >
> > > Can you try using telnet to connect to an external webserv
t; To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>
> Hi Noel,
>
> Can you try using telnet to connect to an external webserver? telnet
> www.google.com 80
> Can you also clarify: do you see the response packets reach the VR and/or
> on what interfaces?
>
> Thanks,
> Marty
>
> On
Guest OS cannot receive responses to http GETs from resources on the Internet.
Network is advanced, VLAN isolated.
What is working:
- can browse guest website from internet- can ssh to guest from internet- can
VPN to guest network from internet
- network VR can access internet sites no problem
Wha
Had a successful 4.0.1 implementation.
However, since upgrade to 4.1
Guest system, on VLAN isolated advanced network, has a public IP...
Have set egress on the network to let everything out.
Forwarding SSH, WWW, HTTPS to guest, this works just fine.
Guest is able to resolve DNS ... masq on the VR a
13 06:02:55 +
>
> Hi,
>
> Rebooting the VR outside the cloudstack, will not program the NAT/firewall
> rules.
> If you reboot the VR from the cloudstack then rules get programmed.
>
> Thanks,
> Jayapal
>
> On 13-Sep-2013, at 5:10 AM, Noel Kendall
> wrote:
FW rules are not persistent in VR? I am trying to figure out why a V4.1 VR does
not properly NAT, and of course,reboot several times to reset state. I see that
after each reboot, the NAT rules are gone. If I go to the mgr, and touchthe
rules for the network in some way, the rules are re-instated
; To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> > > >
> > > > What one can do is create a disk offering using local storage. Then
> > > > when spinning up a VM using the regular shared storage (NFS) include
> > > > a data disk that uses the local storage offer
ing using local storage. Then when
> > spinning up a VM using the regular shared storage (NFS) include a data disk
> > that uses the local storage offering. Once the guest boots it should
> > understand that it has to use the additional disk for swap space.
> > Accompl
e the additional disk for swap space.
> Accomplishing this via scripts... Hope that helps.
> On Aug 12, 2013 4:27 PM, "Noel Kendall" wrote:
>
> > Typically, I configure primary storage onto an NFS server with a RAID1
> > array, and expose that zone-wide.Works fine.
>
Typically, I configure primary storage onto an NFS server with a RAID1 array,
and expose that zone-wide.Works fine.
However, it strikes me that it makes little sense to allow guest VMs to place
their swap files there - which is thesimple model currently in place.
What I would prefer, and makes se
The documentation for installation in a KVM environment is utterly misleading.
The documentation reads as though one can set up the bridge for the public
network with any name one chooses, the default being cloudbr0.
You cannot use just any old name. That simply will not work.
Let's suppose I have
NO, actually, please ignore my reply. I replied to the wrong message. My
deepest apologies for the confusion.Noel
> Date: Wed, 31 Jul 2013 16:13:41 +0200
> From: g.silves...@netsons.com
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: CS 4.1 + vSphere 5.1 - System VMs issue
>
> Hi Noel,
>
> do
I would appreciate help understanding why this StartCommand:
{"StartCommand":{"vm":{"id":2,"name":"v-2-VM","type":"ConsoleProxy","cpus":1,"speed":500,"minRam":1073741824,"maxRam":1073741824,"arch":"x86_64","os":"Debian
GNU/Linux 5.0 (32-bit)","bootArgs":" template=domP type=consoleproxy
host=10.1
Defined a simple zone with basic networking and VLANS
cloudbr1 - VLAN 1 - managementcloudbr2 - VLAN 2 - storagecloudbr3 - VLAN 3 -
guest traffic
The network is shared with security groups enabled, none defined.
Downloaded the template, this worked fine. Primary and secondary storage are
writable
24 matches
Mail list logo
