Contracts! Paul!
I'm happy for you and Cloudstack!
It's nice choice!
On 11/03/19 12:30, "Todd Pigram" wrote:
Congratulations Paul
On Mon, Mar 11, 2019 at 11:18 AM Jochim, Ingo
wrote:
> Congratulations Paul !!!
>
> -Original Message-
> From
Yeah! Go! Go! Go!
Sent from my iPhone
> On 24 Dec 2018, at 08:36, Rafael Weingärtner
> wrote:
>
> It would be great to have your presence :)
> My idea is to have a call after this period of Christmas and New Year’s
> Eve. I will let you guys know when I get the dates and time.
>
> Thanks for
Hey Ivan! Thanks! Good job! This is extremely necessary for me.
✓Cloudstack
On Tue, Aug 21, 2018, 4:18 AM Daan Hoogland wrote:
> hey Ivan, I don't have much experience with anything but bind, but this
> looks nice!
>
> On Tue, Aug 21, 2018 at 7:45 AM, Ivan Kudryavtsev <
> kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.co
? I think there is one or
> two that are used to control this kind of operation.
>
> On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 12:30 PM, Rubens Malheiro <
> rubens.malhe...@gmail.com
> > wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone!
> > I am using cloudstack 4.9.2.0 with 5 KVM hosts, however I have prob
Hello everyone!
I am using cloudstack 4.9.2.0 with 5 KVM hosts, however I have problem with
the migration of disks between storages they are limited to 300MBs in a
10GB network I already checked the network with iperf and I get 10Gb as
well as the IOs of the disks. But the copies really are limited
I believe the best solution for replication is GlusterFS, I have a working
although I can never make cloudstack operate natively I use glusterfs and
nfs-ganesha
I'm sorry, my english
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 7:48 AM, William Alianto wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Sorry for the late reply. So I summarized that
Hello
Cloudstack Management = CentOS 7
KVM = CentOS 7
XEN = None
On Tue, Sep 12, 2017 at 9:12 AM, Rene Moser wrote:
> What Linux OS and release are you running below your:
>
> * CloudStack/Cloudplatform Management
> * KVM/XEN Hypvervisor Host
>
> Possible answer example
>
> Cloudstack Managemen
Wow great explanation! Thank you Eric!
On Sat, 5 Aug 2017 at 14:59 Eric Green wrote:
> qcow2 performance has been historically bad regardless of the underlying
> storage (it is an absolutely terrible storage format), which is why most
> OpenStack Kilo and later installations instead usually use m
Rodrigo what's a version and system nfs server? Network performance between
host pod and storage it's ok?
On Sat, 5 Aug 2017 at 14:03 Ivan Kudryavtsev
wrote:
> Qcow2 does lazy allocation. Try to write big file inside VM with dd (say
> 10GB), erase it and try again. May be lazy allocation works ba
What would be very interesting would be to enable the KVM snapshot feature
live
Maybe this would be a barrier to breaking over the limitation of PODS KVM
vs. XEN
And it would be a resource of immediate impact.
Sorry my english via translate
On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 12:52 PM, Outback Dingo
wrote
t
> you are asking, yes it's hot.
>
> It does rely on QCOW2 disk formats right now.
>
>
> - Si
>
>
> ____
> From: Rubens Malheiro
> Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 7:44 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: KVM VM Snapsh
Sorry to mess up
But a version 4.10 supported snapshot in KVM will it be hot?
On Mon, 10 Jul 2017 at 21:28 Simon Weller wrote:
> Asai,
>
> 4.10 was approved last week. It should hit the repos with the next few
> days.
>
> - Si
>
> Simon Weller/615-312-6068
>
> -Original Message-
> From: A
I'll give you an opniao excuse my English I use Translate.
I recently moved a whole pod with 6 Xen machines to KVM
I'll say it was much quieter and seems to be more stable on both Windows
and Vms in LINUX
But it is necessary to convert the machines in vhd to qcow before deploying.
Works well.
W
Hey this is nice! Congratulations for this work!!!
WIN/WIN
101%Cloudstack
> On 25 Apr 2017, at 08:17, John Adams wrote:
>
> This is great!!!
>
>
> --John O. Adams
>
> On 25 April 2017 at 10:11, Ivan Kudryavtsev
> wrote:
>
>> Hello, Cloudstack community.
>>
>> We are proud to present our
+1
Sent from my iPhone
> On 28 Mar 2017, at 17:55, Sergey Levitskiy
> wrote:
>
> +1
>
Hey Stevens thanks for stable work
Hollander welcome a new challenge! Good Luck!
See you in Miami!! I like a beer!
WIN/WIN
CLOUDSTACK
2017-03-17 7:20 GMT-03:00 Giles Sirett :
> Will - many thanks for your hard work over the past 12 months.
>
> Congrats Wido.
>
>
> Kind regards
> Giles
>
>
re you talking about the
> configuration of IOP/s in the service offering?
>
>
> On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 8:49 PM, Rubens Malheiro >
> wrote:
>
> > Hello everyone. I'm using Google Translate.
> > I'm sorry.
> > But I'd like some help with traffic con
Hello everyone. I'm using Google Translate.
I'm sorry.
But I'd like some help with traffic control for the storages.
I have now a zone configured with XENSERVER and using as a storage FREENAS
only I have a problem of disk transfer rate since one can consume all the
traffic of another vm.
Even when
Hello everyone.
I'm testing the glusterfs in CloudStack.
However if you use the wizard to add the system it does not work however I
realized that the wizard tries to add as ISCIS even selected glusterfs.
To manually add the storage was successful.
However the start systemsvms not checked the storag
+1
Em 9 de jan de 2016 8:55 PM, "Rene Moser" escreveu:
> Hi
>
> I recently started a discussion about the current release process. You
> may have noticed that CloudStack had a few releases in the last 2 months.
>
> My concerns were that many CloudStack users will be confused about these
> many re
Thanks Daan.
Doc. Holliday
101% CloudStack
> Em 30 de dez de 2015, à(s) 11:28, Daan Hoogland
> escreveu:
>
> you can use the 4.6 ones.
>
> On Wed, Dec 30, 2015 at 2:18 PM, Rubens Malheiro
> wrote:
>
>> Hello everyone!
>> Doubt :)
>> The syste
Hello everyone!
Doubt :)
The system vms for CloudStack 4.7 are not available?
Thank you!
Doc. Holliday
101% CloudStack
borate?
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 01/12/2015, 17:23, "Rubens Malheiro" wrote:
>
>> Thank Dag
>> Got it.
>> But if I use shared networks I will have problems since
P ranges. Keep in mind however that if you present
> public IP ranges as shared networks that you may encounter security issues on
> your VMs.
>
> Regards,
> Dag Sonstebo
> Cloud Architect
> ShapeBlue
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> On 01/12/2015, 16:26
Hello everyone!
it is possible to run multiple PUBLIC networks and assign different isolated
networks?
I say this because I use privately CloudStack and own several VLANs would only
expose some addresses the VMS. To do this using the virtual router have problem
why GATEWAY IP conflicts with my
25 matches
Mail list logo