If you have assigned a certificate then it will be 443, otherwise it is
going over port 80.
On 10/14/14, 5:54 PM, "Mo" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>Locally I can access the console of my instances without issue. Outside
>of my network, I have trouble; therefore, I need to open ports. The
>problem is,
Quick question to the group today. When I create a VM in ACS using VMware as
the hypervisor it creates machines with the e1000 adapter. Where can I change
this setting to use the vmxnet3 as the default NIC type.
This document is PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENT
All,
I am running into issues where I export a VM with multiple disks as an OVA
file. I then register it is a template which completes successfully, however
when I start it the OS fails to boot complaining about missing drives. Can
anyone shed some light on this issue please?
Sounds good,
In the meantime I have commented out the "if" statement that checks versions.
> On Aug 28, 2014, at 10:11 AM, "sebgoa" wrote:
>
>
>> On Aug 28, 2014, at 4:39 PM, Xerex Bueno wrote:
>>
>> Looks like there may be one more p
You run, cloudstack-setup-databases cloud:password@Œip/hostname¹. Don¹t
use deploy-as on the secondary server. Also you don¹t need to touch
secondary storage. Let me know if you have any other questions.
On 8/28/14, 9:37 AM, "cst...@trickhosting.biz"
wrote:
>I am not understanding how to ma
014, at 11:27 PM, Xerex Bueno
>wrote:
>
>> In case anyone else runs into this problem I resolved this issue by
>> replacing 4.0.0 with
>>4.3.1-SNAPSHOT
>>
>
>good catch, I had upped the version number and somehow this one got
>missed...
>
>>
>>
4, 8:17 AM, "Xerex Bueno" wrote:
>I must be missing something. So I am installing this on a CentOS 6.5
>fully patched server that is configured as a basic server. Here are the
>steps I take when installing ACS.
>
>1. Extract the RPMs and run ‘createrepo’
>2.
uot; wrote:
>Xerex
>
>I've just rebuild cloudstack. I had no issues with this build. no 404s.
>
>http://download.cloudsand.com/cloudsand/rhel/6/x86_64/cloudstack-4.3.0.1-0
>8282014.rpm.tgz
>
>Regards
>ilya
>On 8/27/14, 2:31 PM, Xerex Bueno wrote:
>> Ilya,
&g
Ilya,
I have installed from the packages you provided. However I am running
into a 404 error when I try and access the Web UI. Have you experienced
this issue?
On 8/20/14, 10:23 AM, "Xerex Bueno" wrote:
>Thanks for the info and the link. I will give it a shot.
>
>
&
In case anyone else runs into this problem I resolved this issue by
replacing 4.0.0 with 4.3.1-SNAPSHOT
On 8/26/14, 1:53 PM, "Xerex Bueno" wrote:
>When I try and build ACS 4.3.1 for nonredist this is the error I receive
>running "mvn clean². Anyone have a fix for this?
So I have installed ACS 4.3.1 from source and when I go to access
http://:8080/client I get a 404 error. Really need some help on this.
This document is PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL and may not be duplicated,
redistributed, or displayed to any other party with
When I try and build ACS 4.3.1 for nonredist this is the error I receive
running "mvn clean”. Anyone have a fix for this?
[INFO] Scanning for projects...
[ERROR] The build could not read 1 project -> [Help 1]
[ERROR]
[ERROR] The project org.apache.cloudstack:xapi:5.6.100-1-SNAPSHOT
(/root
n committed yet by Citrix dev.
>
>I have many smaller environments and i would not see any issues there
>without the mentioned fix. However, in larger environments where
>hypervisor count goes into hundreds, this issue will be more prominent.
>
>Regards
>ilya
>
>
>
>
ent, you may want to tweak the
>java heap size and additional settings limit.conf
>
>What size of env do you have in mind?
>
>Regards
>ilya
>
>On 8/18/14, 9:40 AM, Xerex Bueno wrote:
>> My question for the group is I want to deploy a very stable version of
>>ACS int
My question for the group is I want to deploy a very stable version of ACS into
an environment running Vmware with standard vSwitches. What version would you
recommend?
This document is PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL and may not be duplicated,
redistributed, or
e, login as domain
>admin, create vm and apps, create template for vm and create users for
>that domain.
>
>
> When the user log's in into that domain, he/she should be able to see
>only the templates in that zone, right?
>
>
>
>
>
>___
You could create a different domain for each department, or you could
create separate projects for every department. I would think projects
would be easier in terms of user management if you have lateral movement
between those groups.
On 8/11/14, 5:36 AM, "Giri Prasad" wrote:
>Hi,
>
> I have
Also if someone could give me some guidance or at least a hint on this I am
willing to create documentation for implementation. I looked at the
documentation provided by Citrix and I am not sure that it is correct.
> On Aug 9, 2014, at 9:03 AM, "Xerex Bueno" wrote:
>
>
st 08, 2014 11:50 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Could use a little help
I am thinking you are using advanced networking, can you check the vlan id
provided while adding the public ip range.
Regards,
Bharat.
On 09-Aug-2014, at 9:32 am, Carlos Reátegui wrote:
> Usually th
quot;name":"n1kv-eth-2,,nexusdvs"},{"deviceId":0,"networkRateMbps":-1,"defaultNic":false,"uuid":"4612129e-c57f-4ebb-9b34-d1bb882cbea5","mac":"02:00:33:39:00:06","broadcastType":"LinkLo
Is 4.4.0 more reliable/stable than 4.3?
On 8/6/14, 3:54 AM, "Daan Hoogland" wrote:
>People,
>
>Since there are some problems in 4.4.0 I am planning a bugfix release.
>
>I created a wiki page for it. This only contains dates so far. I am
>offline starting the 16th so I want to have it out by t
sguen" wrote:
>
>On Jul 22, 2014, at 1:41 PM, Xerex Bueno
>wrote:
>
>> One comment on 4.3.1, if you are planning to deploy Nexus1000v in a zone
>> it currently fails on CloudPlatform 4.3.1 which from my understanding is
>> what Cloudstack will release soon.
>
So I have a quick question for the group. It appears that if I install the OSS
version it communicates with VMware 5.5. So the question I have is am I missing
anything by not adding the recommended JAR file and building from source?
This document is PROPRIETARY
One comment on 4.3.1, if you are planning to deploy Nexus1000v in a zone
it currently fails on CloudPlatform 4.3.1 which from my understanding is
what Cloudstack will release soon.
On 7/22/14, 8:41 AM, "Len Bellemore"
wrote:
>Hi Guys,
>
>Anyone know when the 4.3.1 release is due to come out?
I have ACS 4.3 installed pointing at VMware running Nexus 1000v. I can create
a zone however when it creates the systemVMs this error message shows up in the
logs "Failed to retrieve required credentials of Nexus VSM from database"
Does anyone have any ideas on this?
___
All,
Does anyone know where I can find documentation for creating a new zone using
the Cisco Nexus 1000v? The installation documentation seems a little confusing.
This document is PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL and may not be duplicated,
redistributed, or disp
So it looks like Cisco is recommending that you download the Prime Network
Services Controller in place of the VNMC. Has anyone deployed this, or know if
it works with CS 4.3?
This document is PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL and may not be duplicated,
redistribut
All,
Does anyone know if 5.5 is supported, and what files I need to include to
satisfy the dependencies when building from source?
This document is PROPRIETARY and CONFIDENTIAL and may not be duplicated,
redistributed, or displayed to any other party without
I believe I have answered my own question. I remove the appropriate lines from
the pom.xml file under the plugin directory in case anyone else wants to know.
-Original Message-
From: Xerex Bueno
Sent: Thursday, June 26, 2014 1:41 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: non-OSS
list=PLU2OcwpQkYCyPx_cwJxyOK0YKSM86Mj9n&index=26
Regards
ilya
On 6/24/14, 8:14 AM, Xerex Bueno wrote:
> In the documentation it says to download the version 4.1 SDK which reflects
> that it works with 4.1 and 5.0. Does anyone know if it works with 5.5 as
> well, or do I need to use a different SDK?
>
>
9:27 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: non-OSS build required?
Not sure about netscaler, but for vmware you need non-oss version.
There are probably someone that could share their builds.
Erik
24. juni 2014 15:46 skrev "Xerex Bueno"
følgende:
> I was curious if you
I was curious if you are planning on using Cloudstack in an environment that
runs VMware and Netscalers if you still need to build from source. Also where
can I get the latest files that need to be included in the build for VMware and
Citrix Netscalers. Thanks in advance.
I think the best you can do is place the Juniper in front of the virtual
router and configure a private gateway. Given the architecture I don¹t
see how you could replace the VR without committing to a substantial
development project.
On 5/2/14, 2:44 PM, "Fred Newtz" wrote:
>Hello,
>
>I recent
The private gateway is used to allow the termination of MPLS/Metro-E
connections, or some other type of routed network connection into the
customer VPC. Using it for internet access could be accomplished but is
messy and may have little benefit.
On 4/9/14, 11:55 AM, "Sanjeev Neelarapu"
wrote:
>
, do you mean destroying the Systems VMs? I did that once
> testing environment and CS never recreated, so i'm afraid to do so now in
> production environment.
>
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2014 at 8:53 AM, Xerex Bueno wrote:
>
>> Have you tried destroying the inst
Have you tried destroying the instance and allowing CS to create another one
for you?
> On Apr 4, 2014, at 10:45 AM, "motty cruz" wrote:
>
> Hello all, I upgrade Cloudstack 4.1 to Cloudstack 4.2, after upgrading
> Systems VMs status show as Agent disconnect.
>
> for that reason I can't access
; Does the internal loadbalancer takes care if one of my webservers fail?
> Am I able to configure health checks without external hardware?
>
> Thanks,
> Ingo
>
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Xerex Bueno [mailto:xbu...@lpsintegration.com]
> Gesende
re one of the layer 3 switches in front of the firewall and
>pass the management network through the firewall, configure the public IP
>ranges on the layer 3 switch and pass that directly to Cloudstack on a
>separate network interface?
>
>
>Thanks,
>
>Fred
>
>
>On Thu, A
So the default load balancing happens on the vRouter by using HAPROXY.
You can configure load balancing rules to VMs but you cannot select the LB
specifically. If you have en external LB you want to use, you must create
another network offering specifying the external load balancer.
On 4/3/14, 4:
So you will not be able to NAT the public IPs to the vRouter. If you do
NAT them it will become a mess for management, not to mention you reduce
the effectiveness of Cloudstack as a cloud management tool. You need to
expose that block to your WAN switch of which the public interface will
need to
Enter 0.0.0.0/0
On 4/3/14, 3:51 PM, "Michael Phillips" wrote:
>According to the docs it says you can leave the source cidr blank to
>accept all. However when I attempt to leave the source CIDR field blank
>it says it's required.
>How do you accept all incoming CIDR's?
>
___
u have set network rate in the service offering.
>>Or
>> globally in vm.network.throttling.rate. If not defined in service
>>offering,
>> it picks the global setting as the default value.
>>
>> > -Original Message-
>> > From: Xerex Bue
the bandwidth setting will be part of QoS settings. Please
>check the QoS value on VMs vif.
>
>-Sanjeev
>
>-Original Message-
>From: Xerex Bueno [mailto:xbu...@lpsintegration.com]
>Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2014 8:25 AM
>To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: Li
I am running ACS 4.3 with Xenserver 6.2 fully patched. When I create a network
offering and specify the bandwidth to be 1Mbps, then create a new network and
VM it doesn’t apply the bandwidth limit. Why is this happening?
This document is PROPRIETARY and CONFID
44 matches
Mail list logo
