Yes, when I create VMs I specify the compute offering which use local
storage:
$list serviceofferings
name = 4_Cores_2GHz_Local
id = 0bdcefa2-94dd-4a8a-9702-16ce21ef9aa8
...
storagetype = local
Cheers,
Dan
2015-03-18 11:46 GMT-05:00 Somesh Naidu :
> Do you have any compute offering that
already.
Local storage enabledYes
On dashboard I see:
Primary Storage Allocated: 1.24 TB / 1.79 TB
Local Storage: Allocated: 630.28 GB / 21.21 TB
Cheers,
Dan
2015-03-17 16:28 GMT-05:00 Somesh Naidu :
> Local Storage is used for UserVM and SystemVM deployment based on the
> values s
what this Local Storage are used for?
Cheers,
Dan
2015-03-17 13:37 GMT-05:00 Somesh Naidu :
> Dan,
>
> Are all the local storage listed in the storage_pool table? If so, what
> does the capacity_bytes column for these reflect?
>
> In addition, what do you have "Local stora
>"
mailto:d...@soleks.com><mailto:d...@soleks.com>> wrote:
Hi All,
In CS 4.5.0 there is no option to remove template. Is it somewhere ?
Or it's bug ?
Dan.
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
IaaS Cloud Design & Build<
e you able to upload template from
this webserver before?
Sent from my iPhone
On Mar 16, 2015, at 2:00 PM, "d...@soleks.com" wrote:
Hi All,
In CS 4.5.0 there is no option to remove template. Is it somewhere
? Or it's bug ?
Dan.
Hi All,
In CS 4.5.0 there is no option to remove template. Is it somewhere ?
Or it's bug ?
Dan.
. But found only 2TB size of primary storage on dashboard.
So seems the 7 KVM nodes altogether contribute only 1TB for primary
storage. How to allocate more disk space to primary storage? Any global
settings I did not set? Thanks.
Cheers,
Dan
Issue resolved.
After CS 4.3.2 was removed (yum erase cloudstack-*) i removed all
/usr/share/cloudstack* directories - that solve issue with CS start.
There was symlink loop
/usr/share/cloudstack-bridge/webapps/webapps/webapps
This is common exception(I see this exception every time I rest
94G 1% /home/ubuntu/disk2
Cheers,
Dan
2015-03-13 11:15 GMT-05:00 Andrija Panic :
> Suresh, if I'm not wrong, this is extending LVM by adding NEW disk.
>
> Here we need to resize partition of the existing disk (after the disk
> itself is resized by cloudstack) I guess:
>
Hi All,
I've downloaded 4.5-RC4, build RPM without issues (centos 6.6).
Database conversion went smoothly, but eventually wasn't able to start
cloudstack-management, only one error that i found in the log, not
sure if it's road-blocker or easy-to-fix issue, however here is some
log:
20
nt
it in order to use that space? Thanks!
Cheers,
Dan
2015-03-13 10:41 GMT-05:00 Andrija Panic :
> I dont expect your partitions and file system will be resized here...
>
> give us fdisk -land you should see bigger disk than original.
>
> Or maybe I'm wrong - som
3.9G 0 3.9G 0% /run/shm
none100M 0 100M 0% /run/user
Is there a way to let the disk offering take effect?
Cheers,
Dan
got through its name, i.e:
vm_name==>vm_details
Cheers,
Dan
2015-03-04 12:00 GMT-06:00 Harikrishna Patnala <
harikrishna.patn...@citrix.com>:
> Hi Dan,
>
> listVirtualMachine API provided with vm name gives the result of VMs where
> name like “%Provided_VM_name%”.
>
>
Hi,
I found when I try to list details of the VM with name vm-1 by:
list virtualmachines name=vm-1
Cloudstack will also return me with info of another VM machine of vm-10, so
I got 2 VMs info here.
How to avoid this? Thanks.
Cheers,
Dan
I have spacewalk server loaded with CentOS 6.5 install tree. You need
to create install CD, it will be approx 30-40 Mb, and create grub menu
entry pointing to kickstart file which is located on the spacewalk
server. CD need to be uploaded to cloudstack, so you can use it for VM
provisioni
11:02:49DomainROOTAccountadmin
Cheers,
Dan
2015-02-03 3:02 GMT-06:00 Geoff Higginbottom <
geoff.higginbot...@shapeblue.com>:
> @All,
>
> Dan has now shared more info on his setup, anyone out there know of any
> known issues with KVM not cleaning up primary storage.
>
> @Dan - can you
Thank you all. It works!
Cheers,
Dan
2015-02-03 2:19 GMT-06:00 Sebastien Goasguen :
> I think the ubuntu vm at:
>
> http://dl.openvm.eu/cloudstack/ubuntu/vanilla/14.04/x86_64/
>
> are setup with cloud-init…so you will be set.
>
> On Feb 2, 2015, at 5:11 PM, Dan Dong wrot
e that Supports SSH
Keys", but this example is based on CentOS system, does anybody know how to
configure it on a Ubuntu machine? Thanks!
Cheers,
Dan
Hi, Geoff,
Thanks a lot, here are the details:
1. CloudStack version: 4.4.1
2. Hypervisor: KVM
3. Primary storage is NFS, but system.vm.use.local.storage is set to true.
And:
expunge.delay
360
expunge.interval
3600
expunge.workers
1
Cheers,
Dan
2015-02-02 10:36 GMT-06:00 Geoff
destroyed?
Cheers,
Dan
Thanks Lucian, I found I have to do it this way:
customid= size=50
instead of:
diskofferingid= rootdisksize=50
Cheers,
Dan
2015-01-29 10:20 GMT-06:00 Nux! :
> rootdisksize=50
>
> If you type "deploy virtualmachine" in cloudmonkey and hit the "tab" key
> it wi
Hi,
When I tried to deploy a new instance by cloudmonkey CLI for a customized
disk size, e.g 50GB,
how to specify the disk size?
> deploy virtualmachine ... diskofferingid= ...
Error 431: This disk offering requires a custom size specified
Cheers,
Dan
/sysconfig/network, apparently new VMs created did not set HOSTNAME
entry from either "name" or "displayname" of the input parameter( I set
hostname to localhost as stated in the document before creating the
template).
Cheers,
Dan
2015-01-23 6:45 GMT-06:00 Geoff Higginbott
?
Cheers,
Dan
Exactly, thanks Erik!
Cheers,
Dan
2015-01-22 12:46 GMT-06:00 Erik Weber :
> If I recall correctly you'll solve that by upgrading the 'requests' python
> package.
>
> Erik
>
> Den torsdag 22. januar 2015 skrev Dan Dong følgende:
>
> > Hi,
> >
named packages
Looks like a python envs problem, but no clue yet. Any hints? Thanks!
Cheers,
Dan
I selected "DefaultSharedNetworkOfferingWithSGService"
when configuring my Basic Zone Configuration in the UI)? Any hints?
Cheers,
Dan
Thanks Andrija, it works without affinity groups, not sure what wrong with
it, but I could not see the details about the group, only type of "host
anti-affinity".
Cheers,
Dan
2014-12-02 1:24 GMT-06:00 Andrija Panic :
> Hi Dan, could you please try to create VMs without using a
disk, the instance I tried
to create is a anapshot of a VM which is 100GB size. Seems each KVM host
could only create one VM here. So not clear what's the problem? Any
parameters to tune? Thanks.
Cheers,
Dan
.254.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.0.0 U 0 00 eth0
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth1
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 00 eth2
192.168.0.0 0.0.0.0 255.255.255.0 U 0 0 0 eth3
Cheers,
Dan
o cloudbr1
iface cloudbr1 inet manual
bridge_ports eth0.300
bridge_fd 5
bridge_stp off
bridge_maxwait 1
Cheers,
Dan
2014-11-23 7:51 GMT-06:00 Vadim Kimlaychuk :
> Hello Dan,
>
> Sorry for the late reply, have to be out from
: 192.168.0.101
SSVM and guest VMs are all in 192.168.0.*/24 network.
4. NAT is configured on the Management Server so 192.168.0.0/24 subnet
could reach the internet(download packages from internet etc., e.g, from
KVM host itself)
Cheers,
Dan
2014-11-19 1:23 GMT-06:00 Vadim Kimlaychuk :
> Dan,
>
>
ement server can
only use one NIC? And the KVM hypersior host can reach the internet and
download packages, but SSVM running on it could not see the internet.
Cheers,
Dan
2014-11-18 3:20 GMT-06:00 Vadim Kimlaychuk :
> Hello Dan,
>
> It seems there is something wrong with your net
100, but could not ping the external IP of it at 10.*.
>From KVM host itself I can reach the outside internet as NAT is configured
on the Management Server to let the 192.168.0.0 traffic through. Any hints
how to let SSVM to reach the internet?
Cheers,
Dan
auto cloudbr0
iface cloudbr0 inet manual
bridge_ports eth0.200
bridge_fd 5
bridge_stp off
bridge_maxwait 1
# Private network
auto cloudbr1
iface cloudbr1 inet manual
bridge_ports eth0.300
bridge_fd 5
bridge_stp off
bridge_maxwait 1
Cheers,
Dan
2014-11-14 4:19 GMT-
192.168.0.0/24, should I make
NAT on the KVM host to let SSVM running on it to contact the Management
Server( and the outside world)?
(SSVM<->KVM Host<->Management Server)
Cheers,
Dan
ble indeed. It is
> better to have differen LAN-s (VLANs) and partition the network properly.
> External L2/L3 switch is also a requirement.
>
> Vadim.
>
> -----Original Message-
> From: Dan Dong [mailto:dongda...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, November 12, 2014 1:24 AM
> T
outside.
Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Dan
2014-11-11 10:29 GMT-06:00 Dan Dong :
> Hi, All,
> When debugging why my SSVM could not access outside, I see the following
> route table on SSVM:
> root@s-1-VM:~# ip route show
> 169.254.0.0/16 dev eth0 proto kernel scope link s
# Private network
auto cloudbr1
iface cloudbr1 inet manual
bridge_ports em1.300
bridge_fd 5
bridge_stp off
bridge_maxwait 1
Cheers,
Dan
*Could this DNS IP settings a problem? Or I should set it to 8.8.8.8, but
this VMs are just private and not visible to the outside, confused here.*
*cheers,Dan*
2014-11-10 22:14 GMT-06:00 Rajani Karuturi :
> Did you check if the agent is running on SSVM?
> This wiki might help.
>
>
192.168.0.25
2014-11-10 15:12 GMT-06:00 Dan Dong :
> Hi, All,
> When debugging why my ISOs could not be registered, I found when I
> logged into SSVM, I could not even ping the Management Server, although
> they are both in the 192.168.0.0/24 network, so of course could not ping
>
). Should one manually re-configure routing
tables on the SSVM to solve this problem or it is caused by the initial
network design of the cloud? Thanks!
Cheers,
Dan
and KVM hosts could access the internet without problem)? Thanks!
Cheers,
Dan
2014-11-07 23:30 GMT-06:00 Sanjeev Neelarapu :
> Option 2 should work fine. For ISOs to register you may need to set the
> global setting parameter "allowed.internal.sites" to your web server cidr.
&
inet static
address 192.168.0.101
netmask 255.255.255.0
gateway 192.168.0.100
dns-nameservers 192.168.0.100
auto cloudbr0
...
auto cloudbr1
...
Cheers,
Dan
Hi, Jessica,
Thanks, turns out to be a firewall problem.
Dan
2014-11-05 18:00 GMT-06:00 Jessica Wang :
> Dan,
>
> > but still could not open the UI
>
> What error did you see in browser window?
>
> (If you are using firefox, you can see error in firebug)
>
&g
|
+--+--+---+---++---+---+-+---++
Dan
2014-11-05 16:49 GMT-06:00 Jessica Wang :
> Dan,
>
> You should use single quote instead of double quote like this:
>
>
> update configuration set value='192.1
nagement UI after global setting change.
>
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Dan Dong wrote:
>
> > Hi, Experts,
> > When I modified the global settings for
> > "secstorage.allowed.internal.sites"
> > to a different network parameter, I found I could no
on for the right syntax to use
near '"secstorage.allowed.internal.sites"="192.168.0.0/24"' at line 1
2014-11-05 16:28 GMT-06:00 Erik Weber :
> On Wed, Nov 5, 2014 at 10:26 PM, Dan Dong wrote:
>
> > Hi, Experts,
> > When I modified the global
I find the
configuration file path on the Management Ububtu server so I can modify it
back by hand? Thanks!
Cheers,
Dan
/mnt/secondary/iso/ubuntu-14.04.1-server-amd64.iso";.
2014-11-04 15:07 GMT-06:00 Dan Dong :
> Hi, All,
> On my ubuntu openstack 4.4, after I registered my iso, the "Ready"
> status is "No", and when I tried to create an instance from this iso, I
> just
Hi, All,
On my ubuntu openstack 4.4, after I registered my iso, the "Ready"
status is "No", and when I tried to create an instance from this iso, I
just could not see it in the "My ISOs" tab, do you know what's the possible
problem? Thanks a lot!
Cheers,
Dan
No, I will try to delete it. Thanks Motty.
2014-11-04 10:20 GMT-06:00 motty cruz :
> Dan,
> have you deleted any networks you created?
>
> On Tue, Nov 4, 2014 at 7:58 AM, Dan Dong wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> > When I tried to delete a Zone in the UI, it returns an err
Hi,
When I tried to delete a Zone in the UI, it returns an error as:
"The zone is not deletable because there are physical networks in this zone".
What does this mean and how to delete the Zone?
Cheers,
Dan
page does not appear any
more. I would like to try the guided steps to see what happen because the
initial try of the guide was interrupted by some reasons. Thanks!
Dan
2014-11-04 7:40 GMT+08:00 Sam Ceylani :
> on the cs man. server log does it mention anything like "zone x ready to
> l
Yes, the zone is enabled. How to add a system VM?
2014-11-03 17:29 GMT-06:00 abhisek basu :
> Is the zone enabled? CS should create system vms once zone is enabled.
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On 4 Nov 2014, at 4:56 am, "Dan Dong" wrote:
> >
> &
cluster? Thanks!
Cheers,
Dan
I've also encountered the exact same issue. Couldn't Remote Access VPN to
the VPC VR, and thanks to this thread discovered I have no public IP on the
VR (see ifconfig below)
I am also running an upgraded 4.2.1 -> 4.3 setup, on KVM hosts. The only
non-standard aspect of my setup is I am using the
Thanks Ilya
Yes, that is the case re old mammoth! Changing direction and asking
questions though.
Dan
On 2014/07/08, 5:53 AM, "ilya musayev"
wrote:
>I assume this implies AIX. There were number of threads (including mine)
>asking about AIX support on CloudStack. As
Hi
Has anybody worked with PowerVM in ACS environment?
Thanks
Dan Crowe
ShapeBlue SA
Find out more about ShapeBlue and our range of CloudStack related services
IaaS Cloud Design & Build<http://shapeblue.com/iaas-cloud-design-and-build//>
CSForge - rapid IaaS deployment fram
not have to go
through a long import process if at all possible.
If this is possible can someone point me to some whitepapers or
documentation on how this is done?
Thanks!
Dan
Hi Jitendra,
Im running cloudstack management servers and cloudstack database servers as
VMs. 2 VM for management and 2 VMs for database. Database VM(s) are HA mysql
cluster. Management VM - just behind loadbalancer. Of cause that VMs are not
controlled by cloudstack, in my case they are ju
1 |
+---+
1 row in set (0.00 sec)
database cloud_usage. Missed to configured something ?
Dan
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
changes on the dashboard. computational nodes are XenServer 6.2,
>>> 2x4cores. Any hints are more then welcome.
>>>
>>> Dan.
>>>
>>>
>>> This message was sent using IMP, the Inter
7/11/13 12:26 PM, "d...@soleks.com" wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> I configured CPU over provisioning factor 2.0 but cloudstack (4.2) shows
>> no changes on the dashboard. computational nodes are X
at account, it was
>> reflected on the dashboard, sec storage utilization changed, but still
>> wasn't able to create snapshots for that account. Then i configured
>> 'snapshot' settings for account as -1 and snapshot scheduler started to
>> create snapshots.
ount, it was reflected on the dashboard, sec storage utilization changed,
but still wasn't able to create snapshots for that account. Then i configured
'snapshot' settings for account as -1 and snapshot scheduler started to create
snapshots. Does anybody has such probl
Hi all,
I configured CPU over provisioning factor 2.0 but cloudstack (4.2) shows no
changes on the dashboard. computational nodes are XenServer 6.2, 2x4cores. Any
hints are more then welcome.
Dan.
This message was sent
Dan Griffith
Critical Systems Consulting
980-202-CRIT (980.202.2748)
d...@critsyscon.com
Twitter <https://twitter.com/#!/critsyscon> |
Google+<https://plus.google.com/u/0/110824920679253529613/posts/p/pub>|
LinkedIn <http://www.linkedin.com/in/critsyscon>
On Tue, Jul 2, 201
68 matches
Mail list logo
