1 14:52
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ;
> users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> I had explored the migration of repo, but before we do that we need to get
> the original authors to relicense th
_
> From: Rohit Yadav
> Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2021 14:52
> To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ;
> users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider
>
> Hi Peter,
>
> I had explored the migration of repo, but before we do that we n
: peter.murysh...@zv.fraunhofer.de
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 21:04
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ;
users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: AW: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider
Hi all,
are there any updates regarding this topic i.e. migration of HashiCorp
Terraform provider to Apache CloudStack
...@zv.fraunhofer.de
Sent: Monday, March 29, 2021 21:04
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ;
users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: AW: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider
Hi all,
are there any updates regarding this topic i.e. migration of HashiCorp
Terraform provider to Apache CloudStack, either
An: Will Stevens; d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users; Niclas Lindblom; Pierre-Luc Dion
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider
Hi Wido, Will, PL, all,
I think I can setup a repository and request ASF infra (who prefers a JIRA
ticket) to enable PR/issue on it, anybody has an objection
-Luc Dion; Will Stevens
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider
All,
I checked the repository again (was going to start a vote thread on the same),
I think the terraform license could be an issue which is MPL. Can PMC guide us
and comment if MPL is compatible with APL, and should we
30, 2021 02:16
To: Rohit Yadav
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org ; users
; Niclas Lindblom ;
Pierre-Luc Dion
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider
I have no objection to that.
On Fri., Jan. 29, 2021, 11:14 a.m. Rohit Yadav,
mailto:rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>> wrote:
H
tack.apache.org
> *Cc:* users ; Rohit Yadav <
> rohit.ya...@shapeblue.com>; Niclas Lindblom ;
> Pierre-Luc Dion
> *Subject:* Re: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider
>
> Hey PLD,
> You may want to tune into this. I think you may be maintaining a fork
> based on this code, bu
: Will Stevens
Sent: Friday, January 29, 2021 19:49
To: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: users ; Rohit Yadav
; Niclas Lindblom ;
Pierre-Luc Dion
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider
Hey PLD,
You may want to tune into this. I think you may be maintaining a fork based on
this code, but I am
Is infra from ASF the place to ask this?
>
> Wido
>
> >
> > Regards.
> >
> >
> > From: Wido den Hollander
> > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 15:35
> > To: Niclas Lindblom ;
> users@cloudstack.apache.org
&g
...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider
On 1/27/21 12:18 AM, Niclas Lindblom wrote:
I can confirm that the Terraform plugin is working if it is already installed,
since it was archived it no longer automatically downloads when applying unless
manually installed
Agree we can ask that.
Regards.
From: Wido den Hollander
Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2021 15:35
To: Niclas Lindblom ; users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider
On 1/27/21 12:18 AM
06
An: Niclas Lindblom , users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: d...@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: [DISCUSS] Terraform CloudStack provider
On 1/27/21 12:18 AM, Niclas Lindblom wrote:
> I can confirm that the Terraform plugin is working if it is already
> installed, since it was archived it no
On 1/27/21 12:18 AM, Niclas Lindblom wrote:
> I can confirm that the Terraform plugin is working if it is already
> installed, since it was archived it no longer automatically downloads when
> applying unless manually installed.
>
> From the Hashicorp website, it appears it was archived when
I can confirm that the Terraform plugin is working if it is already installed,
since it was archived it no longer automatically downloads when applying unless
manually installed.
From the Hashicorp website, it appears it was archived when they moved all
plugins to their registry and needs an
> On 26. Jan 2021, at 10:45, Wido den Hollander wrote:
>
>
>
> On 1/26/21 10:40 AM, christian.nieph...@zv.fraunhofer.de wrote:
>> On 25. Jan 2021, at 12:40, Abhishek Kumar
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Terraform CoudStack provider by Hashicorp is archived here
>>>
On 1/26/21 10:40 AM, christian.nieph...@zv.fraunhofer.de wrote:
> On 25. Jan 2021, at 12:40, Abhishek Kumar
> wrote:
>>
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Terraform CoudStack provider by Hashicorp is archived here
>> https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-cloudstack
>>
>> Is anyone using or
On 25. Jan 2021, at 12:40, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
>
> Hi all,
>
> Terraform CoudStack provider by Hashicorp is archived here
> https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-cloudstack
>
> Is anyone using or maintaining it?
We are also using it heavily and are somewhat worried about the
On 25/01/2021 12:40, Abhishek Kumar wrote:
Hi all,
Terraform CoudStack provider by Hashicorp is archived here
https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-cloudstack
Is anyone using or maintaining it? We're aware of Ansible CloudStack module
Hi all,
Terraform CoudStack provider by Hashicorp is archived here
https://github.com/hashicorp/terraform-provider-cloudstack
Is anyone using or maintaining it? We're aware of Ansible CloudStack module
(https://docs.ansible.com/ansible/latest/scenario_guides/guide_cloudstack.html)
but are
20 matches
Mail list logo
