Of all the cloud deployments we have been involved with (and that's a lot)
XenServer has been the most popular Hypervisor by far. A number of deployments
were planning on using KVM but switched to XenServer after initial testing for
one reason or another.
KVM is being used, and where it's a
On 26.01.2014 09:47, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
As Shanker says, deploying a cloud with multiple hypervisors is a
common approach, ensuring you get the best of both worlds.
I think that's the bottom line, there's no one hv to rule them all, so
test and use whatever fits your needs.
Lucian
-
From: Nux! [mailto:n...@li.nux.ro]
Sent: Sunday, January 26, 2014 6:59 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Cloudstack 4.2 on XenServer vs KVM
On 26.01.2014 09:47, Geoff Higginbottom wrote:
As Shanker says, deploying a cloud with multiple hypervisors is a
common approach, ensuring
So, I am planning on setting up a brand new cloud infrastructure using
Cloudstack 4.2 on RHEL6. Cloudstack is hypervisor agnostic- I got that...
However there are some differences and features that are available on XenServer
that are not available on KVM. This is from a Citrix salesperson:
On 26.01.2014 00:39, John Mancuso wrote:
So, I am planning on setting up a brand new cloud infrastructure
using Cloudstack 4.2 on RHEL6. Cloudstack is hypervisor agnostic- I
got that... However there are some differences and features that are
available on XenServer that are not available on KVM.
Comments inline.
On 26-Jan-2014, at 8:35 am, Nux! n...@li.nux.ro wrote:
On 26.01.2014 00:39, John Mancuso wrote:
So, I am planning on setting up a brand new cloud infrastructure
using Cloudstack 4.2 on RHEL6. Cloudstack is hypervisor agnostic- I
got that... However there are some differences
