t: Tuesday, 21 May, 2024 08:47:22
Subject: Re: KVM FC shared storage
We once tried to setup PCS cluster with GFS2 In production, and it required a
lot of expertise to manage PCS cluster and our experience was very bad with
that too, after a year we had to move to NFS due to so many issue. FC wor
We once tried to setup PCS cluster with GFS2 In production, and it required a
lot of expertise to manage PCS cluster and our experience was very bad with
that too, after a year we had to move to NFS due to so many issue. FC works
better XenServer, We had almost for 5-6 year with Xenserver And F
We're running FC with OCFS2 (OS: Oracle Linux 9) on a demo 2 node cluster.
Works kind of nice, but of course is not the same as ESXi. For now it works
well enough but expanding that to a actual >10 node setup with hundreds of VMs
doesn't feel right.
Am Mon, May 20, 2024 at 03:48:12PM +0300 schr
If you are 100% FC/NVME then OCFS2 is probably the best (or least bad) option.
I personally always tried to stick to NFS for KVM, it just works.
Reliability wise, I personally consider CEPH to be more reliable (and
supportable) than OCFS2.
Regards
Alex
From: Kristian Liivak
Sent: Monday, May
Hello Kristian,
Take this perspective with a grain of salt given our time spent on this was in
a proof-of-concept deployment.
We tested iSCSI connectivity with OCFS2 as the underlying technology to provide
the shared mount point. We found that throughout the course of host reboots,
the reliabi
