On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Pääkkönen Pekka pekka.paakko...@vtt.fi wrote:
Or would a virtualization solution (for example Xen) be a better choice?
I don't understand your question or you don't understand cloudstack,
Pekka. Using cloudstack you would still need a virtualization server
like
: Suitable solution for HW
On Mon, Mar 3, 2014 at 11:24 AM, Pääkkönen Pekka pekka.paakko...@vtt.fi wrote:
Or would a virtualization solution (for example Xen) be a better choice?
I don't understand your question or you don't understand cloudstack, Pekka.
Using cloudstack you would still need
On 03.03.2014 11:22, Pääkkönen Pekka wrote:
Hi Daan,
Maybe I should have been clearer.
I was wondering about the implications for performance.
Would performance in a database clustering use case be better with
plain Xen (or other virtualization solution), when compared to
CloudStack with Xen?
Hi Daan.
As Nux has already highlighted, disk IO is the critical factor for high
performance database applications.
Using local storage within the Hypervisor will only provide very limited IOPS,
even with 15k SAS disks.
We have been doing a lot of work with SolidFire storage recently. In my
Hi,
Yes. Thanks a lot for your answers.
Regards,
-Pekka
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:daan.hoogl...@gmail.com]
Sent: 3. maaliskuuta 2014 16:15
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Suitable solution for HW
Well Pekka,
:) Do you find an answer to your question
