y Park Way, Bredbury, Stockport, SK6 2SN
-Original Message-
From: Daan Hoogland
Sent: Monday, February 26, 2024 1:03 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: corrupt RVR causing host agent issues
Gary, the mail does not display the screenshot for me. Also this is an old
version (4.15
; Ubuntu 20.04
>
>
>
> Hi all
>
>
>
> We had a physical host crash on Friday due to hardware failure. This
> appeared to have caused issues with some RVR’s going into an ‘unknown’
> state.
>
>
>
> The strange thing was that on any host where a RVR in an unkno
ACS 4.15.2
KVM
Ubuntu 20.04
Hi all
We had a physical host crash on Friday due to hardware failure. This appeared
to have caused issues with some RVR’s going into an ‘unknown’ state.
The strange thing was that on any host where a RVR in an unknown state was
running – we could not console onto
error you must not copy, distribute or take
any action or reliance on its contents. Please destroy any hard copies and
delete this message.
-Original Message-
From: Wei ZHOU
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2023 10:49 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: RVR 2 nics for Private ga
ZHOU
Sent: Friday, October 20, 2023 10:49 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: RVR 2 nics for Private gateway
You can find the private gateways in table "vpc_gateways"
The issue is probably because some gateways or their corresponding networks are
not removed (removed fie
6.0.4 (vpc-PLS_VPC-privateNetwork)
>
>
>
> Seems this is possibly a bug where a previously deleted PG is not fully
> gone and re-appears as a second interface on the RVR ?
>
>
>
> Is there a way I can remove this extra PG config somewhere – perhaps in a
> DB table ?
>
>
: Friday, October 20, 2023 9:40 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RVR 2 nics for Private gateway
ACS 4.14.2
KVM on ubuntu 20.04 hosts
Adv Zone with no SG’s
Hi all
I restarted a redundant VPC with cleanup yesterday so the RVR’s could pick up a
new service offering with more RAM and CPU
4 (PUBLIC)
eth2 172.26.0.2 (vpc-PLS_VPC-privateNetwork)
eth3 172.24.1.38 (172.24.1.0/24 - SERVERS)
eth4 172.24.3.202 (DMZ_172.24.3.0/24)
eth5 172.26.0.4 (vpc-PLS_VPC-privateNetwork)
Seems this is possibly a bug where a previously deleted PG is not fully gone
and re-appears as a second interface o
ttps://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6665
>
>
>
> If we destroy a VM and expunge – on the RVR Master router if we run ‘arp’
> command we still see its MAC to IP entry. We then run scripts/API calls to
> re-provision the VM from a template using the same static IP. The VM bo
Hi all
Hypervisor: KVM
CS : 4.15.2
Came across an issue today with RVR's in a VPC very similar to this issue :
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6665
If we destroy a VM and expunge - on the RVR Master router if we run 'arp'
command we still see its MAC to IP ent
and RVR cannot communicate with each other when on
different hosts
Thanks for the response Andrija
Do you have any real world examples of the RVR feature 'breaking' or any
further info as to why they are not recommended in a production environment /
BR
Gary
Gary Dixon
Senior
Thanks for the response Andrija
Do you have any real world examples of the RVR feature 'breaking' or any
further info as to why they are not recommended in a production environment /
BR
Gary
Gary Dixon
Senior Technical Consultant
T: +44 161 537 4990
E: v...@quadris-sup
Hi,
RVR is a feature that is known to break from time to time, and is NOT
recommended for the Production use, at least that's what we advise your
customers to do/avoid doing.
However, if 2 VMs can not communicate while on different hosts, but CAN
communicate while on the same host - this
Hi
I am hoping someone could help with a new Dev Cloudstack system we are trying
to setup based on Ubuntu 20.04 KVM hosts and mgmt. servers with CS 4.15.2 and
an Adv Zone with VPC's
We spotted that the RVR's in the VPC's are both in the 'MASTER' state
indicating that they cannot communicate wi
Hi Gary,
Currently there is no way to set an anti-host affinity group for RVR.
However, cloudstack tries multiple times to start the (two) RVRs on
different hosts as much as possible.
step 1: start 2nd VR in different pod as 1st VR
step 2: start 2nd VR in different cluster as 1st VR
step 3
Hi all
Quick Question
Can anyone tell me if Redundant Virtual Routers have anti-host affinity built
into it by default as there seems to be no way to set anti-host affinity rules
for RVR's
BR
Gary
Gary Dixon
Senior Technical Consultant
T: 0161 537 4980
W: www.quadris.co.uk
The information
16 matches
Mail list logo