t; From: Chi vediamo
> Date: Thursday, 31 July 2025 at 6:35 AM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Cc: weiz...@apache.org , d...@apache.org
> , gopalpanda...@gmail.com
> Subject: VPN SIte SITE on CS 4.20.1 Using BGP for the Site to Site VPN only
> Hello team
>
> Is there a Way to
ards
Kiran
From: Chi vediamo
Date: Thursday, 31 July 2025 at 6:35 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Cc: weiz...@apache.org , d...@apache.org ,
gopalpanda...@gmail.com
Subject: VPN SIte SITE on CS 4.20.1 Using BGP for the Site to Site VPN only
Hello team
Is there a Way to configure a Sit
Hello team
Is there a Way to configure a Site to site IPsec VPN to from a dual virtual
routers with antiafinity to two remote routers using eBGP using virtual router?
If yes what are the steps.
I Understand I can do it using the VNF. But the VNF is forced to stay Behind
the Virtual router for
Thanks for solving this and sharing the solution!
BTW, the pictures were not sent, perhaps try to "paste" them in rather
than "attach" them to the email.
On 2024-02-19 20:42, Wally B wrote:
Got this resolved!
The issue is the way StrongSwan (OPNSense IPSec Provider) manages
Phase 2 selector
Got this resolved!
The issue is the way StrongSwan (OPNSense IPSec Provider) manages Phase 2
selectors. For the future if anyone runs into this. Just add your networks
into CloudStack like the documentation says to do. Then in your OPNSense
config add additional networks to Manual SPD entries unde
Tried to change the phase 2 selector at 172.16.192.0/16 to a network on the
firewall directly (not just a route the firewall knows). Getting the same
error.
cat /var/log/daemon.log | grep 10.2.200.0/23 ===
Feb 19 03:45:10 r-407-VM ipsec[174957]: 07[CFG] unable to install
I'm working on a site to site connection from my VPC to my on prem OPNsense
VPN.
Cloudstack Version 4.19.0
OPNSense Version 23.4.2
I have two P2 selectors setup in OPNsense and i've got a VPN customer
gateway setup with two subnets ( 192.168.251.0/26,172.16.192.0/20 ) in
Cloudstack.
The issue
We can change the default parameter to 20 for creating 20 s2s vpn
connections with external gateways.
On Tue, Feb 7, 2017 at 10:00 PM, Rafael Weingärtner <
rafaelweingart...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Isn't this only a matter of changing the parameter "site2site.vpn.vpnga"?
> The number 4 seems to be an
Isn't this only a matter of changing the parameter "site2site.vpn.vpnga"?
The number 4 seems to be an arbitrarily small number that was set by a
developer; maybe 4 was the best amount for the developer test/production
environment.
Have you tested changing the parameter to 20, and then creating 20
Hi,
I have need to implement a vpn site to site of my domain cloudstak with
20 external remote gateway/network. I have notice taht the default
maximum number of VPN connection to the VPN gateway is 4. Can I increase
this value to 20, can the VPC handle this traffic or which is the
suggested
Hi CloudStack Users and Developers,
we’re currently implementing a new CloudStack environment based on 4.8.0.1
(System VM Template is 4.6) with XenServer 6.5 SP1 and all the latest
updates.
So far everything works as expected we only have an issue regarding the
stability of Site-to-Site VPNs with
016 2:50 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: SITE TO SITE VPN ERROR IN OUR ENVIRONMENT with CLOUDSTACK-4.3.1 AND
XENSERVER 6.2
Hi Team,
In our environment we are using cloudstack-4.3.1 and xenserver 6.2
We have created VPC router with SUPER-CIDR value as X.X.X.X/16.
After creating VPC r
: Venkat Boggarapu [mailto:venka...@axiomio.com]
Sent: Wednesday, 01 June 2016 2:50 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: SITE TO SITE VPN ERROR IN OUR ENVIRONMENT with CLOUDSTACK-4.3.1 AND
XENSERVER 6.2
Hi Team,
In our environment we are using cloudstack-4.3.1 and xenserver 6.2
We have
Hi Team,
In our environment we are using cloudstack-4.3.1 and xenserver 6.2
We have created VPC router with SUPER-CIDR value as X.X.X.X/16.
After creating VPC router, created a new TIER with X.X.X.X/24 with the same
network, gateway.
Finally we are unable to configure the IPSEC with the X.X.
k.apache.org
> Subject: RE: unable to create VPN connection for Site-To-Site VPN
>
> Anyone?
>
> /Sonali
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Sonali Jadhav [mailto:son...@servercentralen.se]
> Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 3:50 PM
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
VPN connection for Site-To-Site VPN
Anyone?
/Sonali
-Original Message-
From: Sonali Jadhav [mailto:son...@servercentralen.se]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 3:50 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: unable to create VPN connection for Site-To-Site VPN
Hi,
I am running ACS
Anyone?
/Sonali
-Original Message-
From: Sonali Jadhav [mailto:son...@servercentralen.se]
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2016 3:50 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: unable to create VPN connection for Site-To-Site VPN
Hi,
I am running ACS 4.5.2. I am trying to add VPC
Hi,
I am running ACS 4.5.2. I am trying to add VPC connection for making
site-To-Site VPN in vpc. But I running into an error,
2016-01-21 08:44:25,308 DEBUG [c.c.a.ApiServlet]
(http-6443-exec-23:ctx-5134ed7d) ===START=== 1.4.134.114 -- GET
command=createVpnConnection&response=
Aha! thx
/Sonali
-Original Message-
From: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, January 20, 2016 1:47 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Site-To-Site VPN
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Sonali Jadhav
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In order to setup Site-To
On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 9:07 AM, Sonali Jadhav
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> In order to setup Site-To-Site VPN, do I need to add VPC first?
>
>
Yes, Site to Site VPN is a VPC feature.
--
Erik
Hi,
In order to setup Site-To-Site VPN, do I need to add VPC first?
I wanted to setup site-to-site vpn between one cloudstack(domain) network to
remote site. I have added remote VPN gateway. But I think something is missing.
/sonali
,
Anil.
On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 3:45 AM, Logan Barfield
wrote:
> We have a customer that is currently set up in an isolated network in
> an advanced zone. They recently mentioned that they have a need for
> site-to-site VPN connectivity for their application.
>
> Is it possible to m
We have a customer that is currently set up in an isolated network in
an advanced zone. They recently mentioned that they have a need for
site-to-site VPN connectivity for their application.
Is it possible to move an existing isolated network into a VPC for
site-to-site VPN functionality? Or is
, 29 August 2014 4:44 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Failed Site-to-Site VPN 4.4.0 - Error due semicolon
Thanks Erik for your response. My colleagues have resolved this issue in CS
4.4.0 modifying one script in XenServer, at least we have VPN Site-to-Site
tunnels with this version
-Site
tunnels with this version. I hope this issue is resolved with CS 4.4.1
Best
-Mensaje original-
De: Erik Weber [mailto:terbol...@gmail.com]
Enviado el: jueves, 28 de agosto de 2014 22:05
Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Failed Site-to-Site VPN 4.4.0 - Error due semicolon
...@gmail.com]
Enviado el: jueves, 28 de agosto de 2014 22:05
Para: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Asunto: Re: Failed Site-to-Site VPN 4.4.0 - Error due semicolon
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:53 PM, David Amorín
wrote:
> Hi,
> We are having issues to establish VPN Site-to-Site with our VPC based
> in
On Thu, Aug 28, 2014 at 8:53 PM, David Amorín
wrote:
> Hi,
> We are having issues to establish VPN Site-to-Site with our VPC based in
> CS 4.4.0
>
> We see this issue already identified
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7124 but it says that
> only affects the version 4.5.0.
>
>
Hi,
We are having issues to establish VPN Site-to-Site with our VPC based in CS
4.4.0
We see this issue already identified
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-7124 but it says that only
affects the version 4.5.0.
Can somebody confirm if this issue affects also the version 4.4.0?
Hi Paul,
192.168.1.0/16 and 192.168.2.0/16 are not valid CIDR. 192.168.1.0/24 and
192.168.2.0/24 will work
Le mardi 13 mai 2014, Paul Angus a écrit :
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’m trying to create a site-to-site VPN but the CIDR entry:
> 192.168.1.0/16,192.168.2.0/16 is being r
ng the comma to separate.
Regards
Paul Angus
Cloud Architect
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M: +447711418784 | T: CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com
-Original Message-
From: Pierre-Luc Dion [mailto:pd...@cloudops.com]
Sent: 14 May 2014 12:27
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: site-to-si
Paul,
I don't think this is the answer but did you notice that 192.168.1.0/16 and
192.168.2.0/16 are actually the same cidr? You are passing the same address
space twice.
On Tue, May 13, 2014 at 7:42 PM, Paul Angus wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I’m trying to create a site-to-s
ng the comma to separate.
Regards,
Paul Angus
S: +44 20 3603 0540 | M:
+447711418784
T: @CloudyAngus
paul.an...@shapeblue.com<mailto:paul.an...@shapeblue.com>
Original message
From: Daan Hoogland
Date:14/05/2014 07:55 (GMT+00:00)
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject:
Hi,
I'm trying to create a site-to-site VPN but the CIDR entry:
192.168.1.0/16,192.168.2.0/16 is being returned as invalid.
The documentation says that CIDRs should be comma separated, does anyone know
why this isn't working? Just using one or the other works fine.
Regards
Paul An
: CSG - Ashley Lester [mailto:ash...@computer-services.com.au]
> >Sent: Thursday, 29 August 2013 11:13 AM
> >To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> >Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN
> >
> >Hi Dean,
> >
> >If you have some time to test this that would be fantastic, I
Lester [mailto:ash...@computer-services.com.au]
>Sent: Thursday, 29 August 2013 11:13 AM
>To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
>Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN
>
>Hi Dean,
>
>If you have some time to test this that would be fantastic, I have spent
>a few hours on it myself and I believ
We have 10 sonicwall IPsec VPNs running at the same time in our setup. So far
it works fine.
Yong
-Original Message-
From: CSG - Ashley Lester [mailto:ash...@computer-services.com.au]
Sent: Thursday, 29 August 2013 11:13 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Site to Site VPN
l.com]
Sent: August-29-13 9:28 AM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Site to Site VPN
I have 2 sonicwalls in production, I guess I can give it try and let you guys
know, I went over Dell docs and its seems possible but I still need see it
working to confirm.
On Wed, Aug 28, 2013 at 7:
Has anyone had any success using Sonicwalls IPSEC to connect to cloudstack
> Site to Site VPN ?
>
> I'm aware that only Cisco and Juniper are officially supported. Any other
> devices work with this ?
>
> Ashley
>
Hello,
Has anyone had any success using Sonicwalls IPSEC to connect to cloudstack Site
to Site VPN ?
I'm aware that only Cisco and Juniper are officially supported. Any other
devices work with this ?
Ashley
39 matches
Mail list logo
