local storage for system vm’s too.
When the first host crashes, would it auto rebuild them on the second host?
--
Jimmy
86839)
LocalStoragePoolAllocator is returning null since the disk profile does not use
local storage and bypassStorageTypeCheck is false.
And then:
No suitable pools found for volume: Vol[3|name=ROOT-3|vm=3|ROOT] under cluster:
1
...snipped...
Cannot deploy to specified host, returning.
Can you check if (a) y
anagement-server and cloudstack-agent run on the
same system? What version of ACS are you running?
Met vriendelijke groet / Kind regards,
Ruben Bosch
CLDIN
> On 6 Sep 2023, at 21:50, Technology rss wrote:
>
> I see something is wrong fetch my local storage from kvm server, Please
I see something is wrong fetch my local storage from kvm server, Please see
my kvm server as below:
+++
[root@kvm ~]# lsblk
NAME MAJ:MIN RM SIZE RO TYPE MOUNTPOINT
nvme0n1259:00 1.8T 0 disk
├─nvme0n1p1259:30 600M 0 part /boot
Hi,
To control the volume placement to storage you can use storage tags.
-Jithin
From: Wei ZHOU
Date: Wednesday, 6 September 2023 at 1:53 PM
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Can I use KVM local storage for user vm
Hi,
You can add kvm hosts with multiple local storages.
https
*Hi,*
>
> My setup is AlmaLinux8, all are working fine using mgmt+nfs, but I have
> 8 NVME disk (every disk size 1.8TB) mount on kvm server, so I want to
> use all disk as user vm storage disk separately.
>
> *My idea is :* When setup zone then using enable local storage. But this
>
*Hi,*
My setup is AlmaLinux8, all are working fine using mgmt+nfs, but I have
8 NVME disk (every disk size 1.8TB) mount on kvm server, so I want to
use all disk as user vm storage disk separately.
*My idea is :* When setup zone then using enable local storage. But this
settings is only for
Hi Alex,
> Is it possible for each host to add an additional primary storage with a
different mount point.
Yes, you can use different local directories and UUID.
-Wei
On Mon, 24 Jul 2023 at 11:14, Alex Fredman
wrote:
> Hi.
> I use 1 management and 2 kvm hosts (local storage
Hi.
I use 1 management and 2 kvm hosts (local storage) (Apache Cloudstack 4.18.).
Is it possible for each host to add an additional primary storage with a
different mount point.
multiple local storage
>
> Apache CloudStack 4.17 now supports multiple local storage volumes for KVM
> based Hosts. Previously, for KVM hosts, it was only possible to have one
> primary local storage, which prevented providers from adding extra disks to
> be offered on CloudStack.
&
I find this news
https://cloudstack.apache.org/blog/what-s-new-in-apache1/
KVM multiple local storage
Apache CloudStack 4.17 now supports multiple local storage volumes for KVM
based Hosts. Previously, for KVM hosts, it was only possible to have one
primary local storage, which prevented
Hi.
I use 1 management and 2 kvm hosts (local storage) (Apache Cloudstack 4.18.).
Is it possible for each host to add an additional primary storage with a
different mount point.
Another topic of interest that yesterday's tests spawned is "Local storage
matching".
Setup is ACS 4.17.2 with XCP-NG with local storage only (for VR and User
vms)
Here is an example:
there are 30 hosts that will be joined to a pool with the following local
storages:
- server 1-
a Advance zone that have 2 Pod .
> > >
> > > Pod 1 - Hypervisors (kvm) are using share storage . So I have 3
> > physical
> > > network , One for Management and Guest, Second one for VLAN network
> > > (Public). and another one for Storage network on NFS
m) are using share storage . So I have 3
> physical
> > network , One for Management and Guest, Second one for VLAN network
> > (Public). and another one for Storage network on NFS .
> >
> > Pod 2 - Hypervisors (KVM) on Local storage, For this I only need 2
> Phy
e for Storage network on NFS .
>
> Pod 2 - Hypervisors (KVM) on Local storage, For this I only need 2 Physical
> network. One for Management, Guest, and Storage( basically just for
> Secondary Storage), and another network for VLAN (public Traffic)
>
>
> However for the zone ,
Hi
I create a Advance zone that have 2 Pod .
Pod 1 - Hypervisors (kvm) are using share storage . So I have 3 physical
network , One for Management and Guest, Second one for VLAN network
(Public). and another one for Storage network on NFS .
Pod 2 - Hypervisors (KVM) on Local storage, For
Adding mailing list.
>
>
> From: Antoine Boucher
> Subject: Re: Lost of a KVM host with VMs on Local storage
> Date: September 28, 2022 at 1:30:30 PM EDT
> To: Nux
>
> Hi Nux,
>
> Thank you for your response. The template path would be acceptable. As for
&
Hi,
Ideally you would have a full baremetal backup of the hypervisor if
using local storage.
If that is not a possibility, then you could convert the volume snapshot
of the VM into a template and deploy it on the desired hypervisor.
You will not be able to "revert to snapshot&quo
Hello,
We have a few high iops VMs running on local storage on some of our KVM hosts.
We backup (snapshots) these VMs on a regular basis on secondary storage.
In the event of a compete KVM host failure.
What would be the best practice to clean-up and restart the VMs from backups to
a new
*Hi,*
libvirtd status is fine but ACS agent not start. Server centos7.9
*From status Error:*
ERROR [cloud.agent.AgentShell] (main:) (logid:) Unable to start agent:
The UUID of local sto...on-blank
Jul 06 13:35:47 kvm java[4871]: Unable to start agent: The UUID of local
storage pools must be
Hi, you can do that safely. Maybe restarting agents is required, but
nothing that stops the service.
On Wed, Feb 9, 2022 at 2:51 PM Edward St Pierre
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have an existing KVM cluster and am looking to enable local storage for
> certain workloads.
>
> Is it safe
Hi,
I have an existing KVM cluster and am looking to enable local storage for
certain workloads.
Is it safe to enable this on an existing production cluster and am I
correct in assuming that
/var/lib/libvirt/images/ will be the path unless defined within
agent.properties?
Currently my
Indeed, shared mount point storage works best, but still ugly by its
workaround nature)
ср, 25 авг. 2021 г., 18:37 Michael Brußk :
> Hi Ivan,
>
> well, we have already aligned internal, that we will implement handling
> for additional local storage pools (not now, but in near future
Hi Ivan,
well, we have already aligned internal, that we will implement handling for
additional local storage pools (not now, but in near future).
We have also already thought about a very similar workaround as you have
described, but with SharedMountPoint (instead of NFS) in Single-Node
A brief description can be found in the agent.properties file
# local storage path, by default, it's /var/lib/libvirt/images/
#local.storage.path=/var/lib/libvirt/images/
>From my experience this needs to be set before adding the host to cloudstack
>(if not, remove it, change the set
"Cluster" to the same cluster (e.g. C1)
3. tag them appropriately like SSD, HDD, etc.
it works, but it's ugly and it has overhead which is introduced by NFS.
Multiple local storage pools would be great to have...
On Wed, Aug 25, 2021 at 3:43 PM Michael Brußk wrote:
> Hi Davi
sprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: David Jumani
Gesendet: Mittwoch, 25. August 2021 09:01
An: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Betreff: Re: How to add additional local storage pools on KVM
Hi,
You can specify the path to a local directory on the host (which can be
mounted) in the agent.prop
o add additional local storage pools on KVM
Hi,
how is it possible to add additional local storage pools to KVM hosts?
As per documentation (and observations) when adding a new KVM host to a zone,
where "use local storage for client vms" is enabled, CS automatically creates a
new filesys
Hi,
how is it possible to add additional local storage pools to KVM hosts?
As per documentation (and observations) when adding a new KVM host to a zone,
where "use local storage for client vms" is enabled, CS automatically creates a
new filesystem based local storage pool under /var/l
Hello All,
I am testing out cloudstack 4.15.1 with KVM hosts. I have three host. Two of
them have local storage of 20 TB each(the server were used for different
purpose before). So, how shall I proceed towards setting up Cloudstack
environment with host ha (if possible). Will this be possible
d wrote a log, see below.
> >
> > Perhaps you have some host-to-host firewall rule missing?
> >
> > ACS Local Storage Migration Test
> >
> > Test Environment
> > - ACS 4.14
> > - Ubuntu 18.04 in all nodes
> > - 2xCompute Nodes KVM L
o-host firewall rule missing?
>
> ACS Local Storage Migration Test
>
> Test Environment
> - ACS 4.14
> - Ubuntu 18.04 in all nodes
> - 2xCompute Nodes KVM Local Storage
> - 1xManager+NFS+Mariadb
>
> Provisioned Test Environment
> - 1 Zone, 1 Pod, 1 Cluster, 2 Hosts
&g
Hi Hean,
I repeated my test and wrote a log, see below.
Perhaps you have some host-to-host firewall rule missing?
ACS Local Storage Migration Test
Test Environment
- ACS 4.14
- Ubuntu 18.04 in all nodes
- 2xCompute Nodes KVM Local Storage
- 1xManager+NFS+Mariadb
Provisioned Test Environment
...
>
> Regards,
> Rafael
>
> On Mon, 2020-10-12 10:57 AM, Hean Seng wrote:
> > Seems not. Local storage to local storage in another host, It prompt
> > error if not power off, but once power off, it can migrate without error
> >
> > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 4
You also use KVM? and migrate to another host in the same Cluster?
I will run an extra test today for you... and document the steps.
Perhaps we have another configuration difference...
Regards,
Rafael
On Mon, 2020-10-12 10:57 AM, Hean Seng wrote:
> Seems not. Local storage to local stor
Seems not. Local storage to local storage in another host, It prompt
error if not power off, but once power off, it can migrate without error
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 4:31 PM Rafael del Valle
wrote:
> Yes, I can. in ACS 4.14 with KVM
>
> I don't think it is "live"
ou can move the VM while is running on LocalStorage between
> both hypervisor ?
>
>
> As i know , need to power off the VM in hypervisor 1 (with local storage),
> then migrate then only power on in new Hypervisor
>
>
>
> On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 3:40 PM Rafael del V
You can only run live migration on HA enable setup . which is not local
storage, i assume.
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 4:09 PM Hean Seng wrote:
>
> Are you sure you can move the VM while is running on LocalStorage between
> both hypervisor ?
>
>
> As i know , need to power off th
Are you sure you can move the VM while is running on LocalStorage between
both hypervisor ?
As i know , need to power off the VM in hypervisor 1 (with local storage),
then migrate then only power on in new Hypervisor
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 3:40 PM Rafael del Valle
wrote:
> Hi!
>
Hi!
I am testing VM migration with Local Storage in ACS 4.14.
I can Migrate a VM while it is running, takes some time, but it works. The
machine has not been rebooted, I guess was paused and moved over with its
state. Nice!
It is not working for me thou when the VM has Volumes attached. I
Hi
But the instance image will migrated over also ? Cause it is local
storage, or you need to manually copy over ?
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 8:44 PM Rafael del Valle
wrote:
> Hi Hean,
>
>
> There is an option, migrate to another host, if you go to the tab
> instances and quick l
t;
> > ACS seems like a good compromise between being lightweight and capable.
> >
> > I am happy with Local Storage, it is true that it is a mount-point but I
> > mount a LVM volume there, which can be a raid, multiple drives, etc.
> >
> > ACS does a good job with L
Hi Rafael,
How do you do ACS local storage and VM migration to other hypervisor ?
Can you share with me
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 3:56 PM Rafael del Valle
wrote:
> Cristian,
>
> In my case I am moving from OpenNebula to ACS.
>
> ACS seems like a good compromise between being
Cristian,
In my case I am moving from OpenNebula to ACS.
ACS seems like a good compromise between being lightweight and capable.
I am happy with Local Storage, it is true that it is a mount-point but I mount
a LVM volume there, which can be a raid, multiple drives, etc.
ACS does a good job
I am using 4.14 , and indeed , it need create offering and the tag to
local storage .
I am now using SolusVM for VPS and Virtualizor , Planning to use
Cloudstack or OpenStack, Openstack has too many issue for setting up, and
i forsee it may create a lot of maintenance in future . Thus try
... and disk offering... sorry.
On Fri, 2020-09-18 09:11 AM, Rafael del Valle wrote:
> Hi Hean, Cristian,
>
> Please also check with version of ACS you use.
>
> In ACS 4.14 I have to create a Compute Offering and Network Offering with
> Local Storage Enabled.
>
> I th
Hi Hean, Cristian,
Please also check with version of ACS you use.
In ACS 4.14 I have to create a Compute Offering and Network Offering with Local
Storage Enabled.
I think there is no longer a zone setting for user VMs, but there is for
SystemVMs.
Here are some settings I am using
Thanks, it works
On Fri, Sep 18, 2020 at 12:51 PM Pearl d'Silva
wrote:
> Hi Hean,
>
> Either when creating a zone, in the zone creation wizard, while adding the
> zone details, you must enable usage of local storage for user VM and / or
> SystemVMs, so as to use local store
Hi Hean,
Either when creating a zone, in the zone creation wizard, while adding the zone
details, you must enable usage of local storage for user VM and / or SystemVMs,
so as to use local store as a primary storage; or if the zone is already
created, you may edit the zone configuration, and
Hi
Anybody know to add local storage to Primary Storage.
--
Regards,
Hean Seng
Hi Andrija,
Just added, please see : https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues/4187
Regards,
Cristian
-Original Message-
From: Andrija Panic
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 12:54 PM
To: users
Subject: Re: ACS 4.14 Migration not working for VMware with local storage.
Hi Christian
Hi Christian,
this sounds like a bug. Can you please log an issue on
http://github.com/apache/cloudstack/issues with detailed description on how
to reproduce the issue.
Thanks,
Andrija
On Sun, 28 Jun 2020 at 13:21, Cristian Ciobanu
wrote:
> Update:
>
> I found a workaround :
>
> 1. Sto
Update:
I found a workaround :
1. Stop VM
2. Migrate to the destination storage
3. Start VM on destination storage, at this point I get this error : File
[]/vmfs/volumes/5ef5902c-83b77eaa-5143-b4a9fc1bb3ae/i-2-1497-VM/ROOT-1497.vmdk
was not found
4. If i check the destinat
Hello,
I just wanted to migrate a VM to a different host, I did this multiple
times in previous version (4.11) with success, IN this version after I turn
off and execute migrate, select destination I get in few seconds that is was
migrated, on VMware side I only see the following status :
Hello all
My ACS 4.11.3+ xenserver 7.1.3 +iscsi shared storage.
We plan to add multiple SSD hard drives to each HOST, and each SSD hard drive
is made into an SR. These SRs are added to the ACS for local storage.
Proceed as follows :
1, create an SR of the SSD disk
2, add a record to the
Hi,
On 18.07.19 03:08, Ivan Kudryavtsev wrote:
> As for 4.11.2, no way to have multiple local storages configured for a
> single host. There is no simple way to overcome it. The only one I see is a
> pretty ugly - locally mounted NFS, created as a cluster wide storage when
> only a single host add
Shared mountpoint is ok
чт, 18 июл. 2019 г., 12:14 Fariborz Navidan :
> Hi
>
> I have already used this way. I feel local NFS mount point adds another
> layer over local storage and can affect IO speed and performance. What do
> you think of it? What about SharedMountPoint optio
Hi
I have already used this way. I feel local NFS mount point adds another
layer over local storage and can affect IO speed and performance. What do
you think of it? What about SharedMountPoint option? Between this and local
NFS which one offers better performance?
Thanks
On Thu, Jul 18, 2019
s not supported, only one local storage per host. It's a great
feature request, but unsure many people use that topology.
чт, 18 июл. 2019 г., 4:04 Fariborz Navidan :
> Hello,
>
> I have a few mount points which refer to different block devices on local
> machine. I am trying to
Hello,
I have a few mount points which refer to different block devices on local
machine. I am trying to add them as additional primary local storage to
CS, Unfortunately, when adding primary storage there is no Filesystem
option to choose. As a result I have managed to modify the storage_pool
Hello,
Hi Fariborz,
Are you able to register template from any other host or public templates?
Is the SSVM agent connect up?
Check the management server logs (sample logs below) to verify the download
cmd delegation to SSVM, after *registerTemplate* API call.
*getCommandHostDelegation: class
org.apac
On 2/27/19 2:58 PM, Fariborz Navidan wrote:
Hello All,
I have used qemu-img tool to convert a vmdk to qcow2 image. I want to add
the image as template to ACS so I can deploy from it and get the VM
migrated to ACS. I have installed httpd on management server and I am able
to start the file at url
Hello All,
I have used qemu-img tool to convert a vmdk to qcow2 image. I want to add
the image as template to ACS so I can deploy from it and get the VM
migrated to ACS. I have installed httpd on management server and I am able
to start the file at url such as http://hostname/images/test.qcow2 fro
Ivan,
It was odd, after waiting for the jobs to clear, everything ended up working
Thanks
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
Sent: 10 December 2018 18:10
To: users
Subject: Re: Local storage
** This mail originated from OUTSIDE the Oakford corporate network. Treat
Hi Adam.
Doesn't look like the problem is connected with local storage. Please
enable the debug mode for the agent and share. Also, the corresponding log
from the management server is welcome.
PS: We use only local storage in our cloud, everything should work great
out of the box (at leas
Guys
Some issues with this, I have tried to spin up an instance on local storage -
the agent then became disconnected and I have this in the logs
Dec 10 08:30:03 xxx sh[303588]: INFO [cloud.agent.Agent] (Agent-Handler-4:)
(logid:) Lost connection to the server. Dealing with the remaining
4.11.0
-Original Message-
From: McClune, James
Sent: 07 December 2018 16:30
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: Re: Local storage
** This mail originated from OUTSIDE the Oakford corporate network. Treat
hyperlinks and attachments in this email with caution. **
Hi Adam,
My
Hi Adam,
My apologies, what version of CloudStack are you running?
Like Ivan said, you would need to enable local storage for the zone.
libvirt should create a local storage pool, like you stated. The UUID &
path would be in /etc/cloudstack/agent.properties. virsh pool-list will
verify.
Thanks Ivan
-Original Message-
From: Ivan Kudryavtsev
Sent: 07 December 2018 16:07
To: users
Subject: Re: Local storage
** This mail originated from OUTSIDE the Oakford corporate network. Treat
hyperlinks and attachments in this email with caution. **
Adam, EXT4, XFS work just fine
г. в 11:04, Adam Witwicki :
> Can anyone recommend a good file system to format this local storage with?
>
> Thanks
>
> Adam
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Adam Witwicki
> Sent: 07 December 2018 16:01
> To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: R
Can anyone recommend a good file system to format this local storage with?
Thanks
Adam
-Original Message-
From: Adam Witwicki
Sent: 07 December 2018 16:01
To: users@cloudstack.apache.org
Subject: RE: Local storage
** This mail originated from OUTSIDE the Oakford corporate network
Just enable Local Storage for Zone, when you next add a KVM host CS
automatically will use its local storage and add it to the dashboard. You
can next add tags or remove it if you don't want to use LocalStorage with
the specified host.
пт, 7 дек. 2018 г. в 10:59, Adam Witwicki :
> I th
I thought it related to this in the agent.props
local.storage.uuid=
local.storage.path=/var/lib/libvirt/images/
and enabling local storage in the zone??
The link you sent shows none of that?
Thanks
Adam
-Original Message-
From: McClune, James
Sent: 07 December 2018 15:55
To
Hi, Adam. Just enable Local Storage for Zone and provide proper storage for
/var/lib/libvirt/images
пт, 7 дек. 2018 г. в 10:48, Adam Witwicki :
> Hello
>
> Is there a guide on how to set up local storage using KVM in cloudstack?
>
> Thanks
>
> Adam
>
>
>
> Di
Hi Adam,
This should do it:
http://docs.cloudstack.apache.org/en/latest/adminguide/storage.html#using-local-storage-for-data-volumes
Best,
James
On Fri, Dec 7, 2018 at 10:49 AM Adam Witwicki
wrote:
> Hello
>
> Is there a guide on how to set up local storage using KVM in cloudstack?
&
Hello
Is there a guide on how to set up local storage using KVM in cloudstack?
Thanks
Adam
Disclaimer Notice:
This email has been sent by Oakford Technology Limited, while we have checked
this e-mail and any attachments for viruses, we can not guarantee that they are
virus-free. You must
server and the host?
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 19, 2018, 5:01 PM Sagnik Sasmal >
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Thanks a lot :)
> > >
> > > On Sun, Aug 19, 2018, 5:00 PM Ivan Kudryavtsev <
> kudryavtsev...@bw-sw.com
> > >
> > > wrote:
&
t;
> >> Hey, just use /var/lib/libvirt/images mountpoint and allow local storage
> >> for zone. LVM-based images are not supported as CloudStack uses qcow2.
> >>
> >> вс, 19 авг. 2018 г., 17:27 Sagnik Sasmal :
> >>
> >> > I'm a bit confuse
;
> On Sun, Aug 19, 2018, 5:00 PM Ivan Kudryavtsev
> wrote:
>
>> Hey, just use /var/lib/libvirt/images mountpoint and allow local storage
>> for zone. LVM-based images are not supported as CloudStack uses qcow2.
>>
>> вс, 19 авг. 2018 г., 17:27 Sagnik Sasmal :
>
Thanks a lot :)
On Sun, Aug 19, 2018, 5:00 PM Ivan Kudryavtsev
wrote:
> Hey, just use /var/lib/libvirt/images mountpoint and allow local storage
> for zone. LVM-based images are not supported as CloudStack uses qcow2.
>
> вс, 19 авг. 2018 г., 17:27 Sagnik Sasmal :
>
> > I&#
Hey, just use /var/lib/libvirt/images mountpoint and allow local storage
for zone. LVM-based images are not supported as CloudStack uses qcow2.
вс, 19 авг. 2018 г., 17:27 Sagnik Sasmal :
> I'm a bit confused about this. How should I make the partitions? Also, are
> LVMs (not shared,
I'm a bit confused about this. How should I make the partitions? Also, are
LVMs (not shared, just local to the host), supported? A link to the docs
would be great :)
Thanks
gt; listHosts id=5
> listStoragePools
> listStoragePools id=1
> listVirtualMachines id=19
> listVolumes id=70
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 5:30 PM, Daznis wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> It has 1 zone. I'm not sure how it got zoneid2. Probably failed to add
>> w
eid2. Probably failed to add
> whole zone and was added again. We have 4 hosts with local storage on
> them for system vms and VMS that need ssd storage and ceph primary for
> everything else plus one secondary storage server.
>
> On Mon, May 14, 2018 at 5:38 PM, Marc-Aurèle Bro
Hi,
It has 1 zone. I'm not sure how it got zoneid2. Probably failed to add
whole zone and was added again. We have 4 hosts with local storage on
them for system vms and VMS that need ssd storage and ceph primary for
everything else plus one secondary storage server.
On Mon, May 14, 2018 at
Hi Daznis,
Reading the logs I see some inconsistency in the values. Can you describe
the infrastructure you set up? The things that disturbs me is a zoneid=2,
and a destination pool id=1. Aren't you trying to migrate a volume of a VM
between 2 regions/zones?
On Sat, May 12, 2018 at 2:33 PM, Dazni
Hi,
Actually that's the whole log. Above it just job starting. I have
attached the missing part of the log. Which tables do you need from
the database?
There are multiple records with allocated/creating inside
volume_store_ref. There is nothing that's looks wrong with
volumes/snapshots/snapshot_sto
Hi Darius,
>From the logs, I could observe that image volume is already in the creating
state and trying to use the same for copying the volume between pools. So,
state transition failed. Could you please provide the complete log for the
usecase to root cause the issue. Also, include volumes and s
Snapshots work fine. I can make a snapshot -> convert it to template
and start the VM on a new node from that template. When I needed to
move one VM for balance purposes. But I want to fix the migration
process. I have attached the error log to this email. Maybe I'm
looking at the wrong place were
Can you try to perform a snapshot of the volume on VM's that are on your
host, to see if they get copied correctly other the NFS too.
Otherwise you need to look into the management logs to catch the exception
(stack trace) to have a better understanding of the issue.
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 1:58 P
Hello,
Yeah it's offline. I'm running 4.9.2 version. Running it on the same
zone with the only NFS secondary storage.
On Wed, May 9, 2018 at 10:49 AM, Marc-Aurèle Brothier wrote:
> Hi Darius,
>
> Are you trying to perform an offline migration within the same zone,
> meaning that the source and
Hi Darius,
Are you trying to perform an offline migration within the same zone,
meaning that the source and destination hosts have the same set of NFS
secondary storage ?
Marc-Aurèle
On Tue, May 8, 2018 at 3:37 PM, Daznis wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm having an issue while migrating offline vm disk w
Hi,
I'm having an issue while migrating offline vm disk within local
storages. The particular error that has be baffled is "Can't find
staging storage in zone". From what I have gather "staging storage"
referred to secondary storage in cloudstack and it's working perfectly
fine with both the sour
Thank you Sergey, I restarted the ACS, can see the local storage in
storage_pool table
Thank you all for the help extended
Best Regards
Asanka
On 6 November 2017 at 22:35, Sergey Levitskiy wrote:
> Try unmanage your vmware cluster and make it Managed again. Restarting ACS
> will also
t; Never tried it for other hypervisors. You can verify if entries for
> each local datastore are created in storage_pool table. One they are
there,
> provisioning with service offering using local storage should succeed.
>
> On 11/2/17, 10:25 AM, "Dag Sonst
gt; Never tried it for other hypervisors. You can verify if entries for
> each local datastore are created in storage_pool table. One they are there,
> provisioning with service offering using local storage should succeed.
>
> On 11/2/17, 10:25 AM, "Dag Sonstebo"
> wr
Levitskiy" wrote:
Never tried it for other hypervisors. You can verify if entries for each
local datastore are created in storage_pool table. One they are there,
provisioning with service offering using local storage should succeed.
On 11/2/17, 10:25 AM, "Dag Sonstebo"
Never tried it for other hypervisors. You can verify if entries for each local
datastore are created in storage_pool table. One they are there, provisioning
with service offering using local storage should succeed.
On 11/2/17, 10:25 AM, "Dag Sonstebo" wrote:
Thanks for the
1 - 100 of 262 matches
Mail list logo
