I will check if it is applied in the next version 4.9.1
Thanks Simon
David
-- Mensaje original --
De: "Simon Weller"
Para: "[email protected]" ;
"[email protected]" ; "David
Amorín"
Enviado: 24/10/2016 15:55:45
Asunto: Re: Re[3]: Erased snapshot/templates still
Hello guys,
I'm having some doubts and questions about which is the best way to
upgrade our current Cloudstack platform, to a newer and better one (bug
fixes, new features, etc...)
I would like to know about the known issues and troubles that we can be
exposed during the upgrade process, and
Hi Marc,
You don’t have to upgrade to each minor version – in other words you only need
to carry out one upgrade to your target version. In general we advise our
customers to test the upgrade in a non-production environment to ensure
everything works OK.
Regards,
Dag Sonstebo
On 25/10/2016, 1
Sorry to bring up an old question, just want to ask again if somebody
can confirm this issue (inverted order of the ACL rules) with CS 4.9 and
VPC router version 4.6
Thanks,
David
-- Mensaje original --
De: "David Amorín"
Para: "[email protected]"
Enviado: 17/10/2016 11:16
David,
Can you post your question to the dev list?
You're more likely to get a response there.
- Si
From: David Amorín
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 9:23 AM
To: [email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: Re[7]: Network ACL rules in V
Good afternoon Dag Sonstebo,
Thanks for that quick answer, as an extra question about it, do you know
which is the best version to upgrade in our case with our current
Cloudstack version (4.5.2)? And also is there's any version which is not
worth to go due to known issues, and better for us to
Marc,
The ACS community strives to make every release stable. Since every company has
their own unique feature requirements, it's important (as Dag pointed out) for
each organization to lab up any upgrade and test the features you're using to
make sure the release works as you expect.
Curren
We upgraded from 4.5.2 to 4.8.1 (the latest version at the time of our upgrade)
in one step.
yiping
On 10/25/16, 9:15 AM, "Simon Weller" wrote:
Marc,
The ACS community strives to make every release stable. Since every company
has their own unique feature requirements, it's i
Hello,
Can somebody please provide the steps to separate Management traffic from
Primary Storage with KVM?
I’ve deployed a storage label but that’s only for secondary storage. So how do
I do that with Primary storage? Can I add it back to an existing Advanced zone?
Or Do I need to deploy a new
Nassar,
What type of primary storage are you using?
- Si
From: Nassir Jamal
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 2:41 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Separate Management and Primary Storage
Hello,
Can somebody please provide the steps to separate Man
Currently NFS, but I’m waiting to add Ceph until this is figured out.
Thank You Simon
On 10/25/16, 2:48 PM, "Simon Weller" wrote:
Nassar,
What type of primary storage are you using?
- Si
From: Nassir Jamal
Just connect the storage via a different physical network (or vlan) to the
hosts. You don't need to do any tagging in ACS management for it. The host
agents talk to the storage, so as long as the agent can see the primary
storage, you should be good to go.
- Si
__
Thank you. When I attempted that, it kept trying to reach primary storage over
the Cloudbr0 that I specified for management on the KVM hosts.
Is there any labeling or bridge I need to do in KVM? Or will it use the open
card? I guess how does it know which open interface to use for primary storag
It should be based on the ip address of the nfs server you defined. Is your
storage on a different subnet?
From: Nassir Jamal
Sent: Tuesday, October 25, 2016 3:08 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Separate Management and Primary Storage
Thank you.
Hello...how many nics do u have ?
Get Outlook for Android
On Wed, Oct 26, 2016 at 2:01 AM +0530, "Simon Weller" wrote:
It should be based on the ip address of the nfs server you defined. Is your
storage on a different subnet?
From: Nassir Jam
Hi,
Storage type support on hypervisor level, fc,iscsi etc. You need to map
your primary stg in KVM, cong agent, try to re-add hypervisor
25 Окт 2016 г. 22:42 пользователь "Nassir Jamal" <
[email protected]> написал:
> Hello,
>
> Can somebody please provide the steps to separate Managem
The way I’m understanding this then is the following:
- Have a NIC on the same subnet that storage is on KVM
- Then based on IP you enter into primary settings it should use the right NIC
- There is not a way to fully define the exact NIC to be a primary storage NIC.
Just IP and Subnet for matchin
Hi David,
Yes its a known issue. It has been fixed, i thought in 4.9, maybe the PR
has not been process yet?
On Oct 25, 2016 10:46, "Simon Weller" wrote:
David,
Can you post your question to the dev list?
You're more likely to get a response there.
- Si
F
Hi,
I have updated global settings for network.throttling.rate and
vm.network.throttling.rate from 200 to 500 Mbps, and restarted mgmt. service.
Now I restarted two of my test VM instances, but using iperf3 I still see these
two test VM instances got 200 Mbps network bandwidth. What else do I
Users,
I am facing a problem with one client running a VPC on my HVM-backed
CloudStack 4.5.2. The machines behind the VR get poor ping times and slow
transfers. I think the issue is the Intel network adapter driver...
Typically I setup Windows VM's with Windows PV as the OS type and add the
driver
Hello i'm going to setup basic cloudstack,my problem was as above. I am
able to create SSVM and CPVM and the status is running and up.But while i'm
check the ssvm health through /usr/local/cloud/systemvm/ssvm-check.sh it
shows as below...
First DNS
Hello All,
Are there any known issues with scaling issues with the controller
services? How many hypervisors should I be able to deploy to a zone before
running into issues and having to start a new zone?
Thanks for any info!
22 matches
Mail list logo
