Hi Udo,
Unfortunately, I don't know the exact date. I guess it will be announced in
a few days.
Here is the thread of the discussion of its release
https://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg95593.html
Regards,
Slavka
On Mon, May 31, 2021 at 10:59 PM Udo Müller wrote:
> Hi Slavk
Hi All and Happy Tuesday :)
If you have missed CSEUG Virtual or some talks out of it, I am happy to share
that this week we will publish the recordings on the official Apache CloudStack
YouTube channel.
The videos will come live this and next week on an instant premier on the
channel.
If you s
I set up another VM host so now I have two VM hosts. I’m experimenting with
live migrations. It looks like the VM migrates, but I can no longer SSH to the
guest once it’s migrated. I’m using an isolated network. I setup firewall
rules to allow all, along with port forwarding rules for ssh.
I think that your switch doesn't have ports tagged with all required
VLANs...
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 11:20 AM Jeremy Hansen wrote:
>
> I set up another VM host so now I have two VM hosts. I’m experimenting
> with live migrations. It looks like the VM migrates, but I can no longer
> SSH to the
Hmm. VM hosts are on the same vlan. Port configuration on both hosts is exactly
the same. I’m not saying it isn’t vlan related but I would expect neither host
to work if it was a vlan issue?
Thanks
> On Jun 1, 2021, at 2:47 AM, Alessandro Caviglione
> wrote:
>
> I think that your switch doe
Ahh, so I just noticed that I could also migrate the router and when I do that,
everything works as expected again. So is this how migrates work? Do routers
always have to move with the instance?
-jeremy
> On Jun 1, 2021, at 3:26 AM, Jeremy Hansen wrote:
>
> One thing I noticed, and I don’
Thanks for sharing, Ivet,
The event was great! Many thanks to all that participated in it! :)
Kind regards,
Slavka
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 11:27 AM Ivet Petrova
wrote:
> Hi All and Happy Tuesday :)
>
> If you have missed CSEUG Virtual or some talks out of it, I am happy to
> share that this wee
No, but if you're using Advanced Networking you've to manage the trunk
configuration on the switch ports.
Every Virtual Router has a public IP on a specific interface and a specific
VLAN and a private IP on another interface in another vlan that acts as a
gateway for the instance.
So, if VR and ins
Jeremy,
Check this global setting. I've set it to 3 as we use NFS 3 in our environment.
secstorage.nfs.version Enforces specific NFS version when mounting Secondary
Storage. If NULL default selection is performed
-Original Message-
From: Harikrishna Patnala
Sent: Sunday, May 30, 202
Thanks for the reply Abhishek!
1- ACS deploys the VM from template; however, it fails and shows Error in
ACS-Instances UI. So the VM remains in vCenter - that VM has the CPU/RAM as
the template NOT what the ACS service offering (Small Instance) I selected. I
suppose ACS is not finishing the c
Unsupported Configuration: IDE
controllers
are unsupported for this QEMU binary or machine type
I am using cloudstack on CentOS 7.9 with
# rpm -qa | egrep "(qemu|libvirtd|OVMF|cloudstack)"
*cloudstack*-agent-4.15.1.0-SNAPSHOT.20210601.el7.x86_64
*qemu*-kvm-ev-2.12.0-44.1.el7_8.1.x86_64
ipxe-
ine type
>
> I am using cloudstack on CentOS 7.9 with
>
> # rpm -qa | egrep "(qemu|libvirtd|OVMF|cloudstack)"
> *cloudstack*-agent-4.15.1.0-SNAPSHOT.20210601.el7.x86_64
> *qemu*-kvm-ev-2.12.0-44.1.el7_8.1.x86_64
> ipxe-roms-*qemu*-20180825-3.git133f4c.el7.no
ESXI servers are supposed to be reachable on the ACS mgmt net, but most
communications go through the vcenter machine. I'm not sure, but I don't
think the ACS mgmt net has to be the same as vshpere mgmt net.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 4:32 AM 小林 美佳子 wrote:
> Hi.
>
> Does anyone have a track record o
Hey everyone,
I am playing around with shared networks and I noticed that
when network is created for the ROOT user the lower level domains see it too.
Is there a way to hide that network from the lower level domain
users?
Here is my setup:
*
virtd|OVMF|cloudstack)"
*cloudstack*-agent-4.15.1.0-SNAPSHOT.20210601.el7.x86_64
*qemu*-kvm-ev-2.12.0-44.1.el7_8.1.x86_64
ipxe-roms-*qemu*-20180825-3.git133f4c.el7.noarch
libvirt-daemon-driver-*qemu*-4.5.0-36.el7.x86_64
*OVMF*-20180508-6.gitee3198e672e2.el7.noarch
*qemu*-img-ev-2.12.0-44.1.el7_8.1.x86
Hi all,
The following was working with 4.15.0.
Status quo: 4.15.1 SNAPSHOT, database new initialized. Configuration
done with the same settings as 4.15.0
i am trying to add a user to the account admin. So i click on
Accounts -> admin -> View Users -> Add User
Popup Window opens fine.
-
Hi guys,
next one:
I had this problem with 4.15.0 and also with 4.15.1 SNAPSHOT
I have successfully done the configuration wizard and was able to add
the first host to my cluster. After finishing it i wanted to add more
hosts. So i clicked on Infrastructure -> Hosts and get the error message
Oh and btw: The Add user-Popup is rendered wrong in Safari, but is
working fine in Chrome and Firefox.
See attached screenshots.
Is it possible for me to change anything to get this back to work?
Regards Udo
Am 01.06.21 um 17:33 schrieb Udo Müller:
Hi all,
The following was working with 4.
Oops
now the screenshots are attached.
Regards udo
Am 01.06.21 um 17:43 schrieb Udo Müller:
Oh and btw: The Add user-Popup is rendered wrong in Safari, but is
working fine in Chrome and Firefox.
See attached screenshots.
Is it possible for me to change anything to get this back to work
Jordan, is there a reason it must be a shared network? It seems to me you
want an isolated network or a VPC.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 5:19 PM Yordan Kostov wrote:
> Hey everyone,
>
> I am playing around with shared networks and I noticed
> that when network is created for the ROOT
We've seen things like this and they have to do with for instance Dutch or
German locales used in the UI. I thought this was solved in 4.15.1 and up.
try using english and see if that works.
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 5:40 PM Udo Müller wrote:
> Hi guys,
>
>
> next one:
>
> I had this problem with 4
Hi Udo,
I was able to reproduce the problem with the new UI. With the old UI, you
can create a user. You can open an issue on GitHub for the problem
Regards,
Slavka
On Tue, Jun 1, 2021 at 6:46 PM Udo Müller wrote:
> Oops
>
>
> now the screenshots are attached.
>
> Regards udo
>
> Am 01.06.
t; >> Now I get the following problem:
> >>
> >> Unable to start VM on Host... due to Unsupported Configuration: IDE
> >> controllers
> >> are unsupported for this QEMU binary or machine type
> >>
> >> I am using cloudstack on CentOS 7
Hey Dan,
The problem is that the network itself is managed by external firewall
and not by the virtual Router.
The VR only provides DNS, DHCP and USERDATA services.
What I am working towards is - lets say we have 2 teams and 2 networks
managed by external firewal
FYI I figured it out!
Cloudmonkey create network command has attribute subdomainaccess (Boolean) if
set to true child domains will not see the network.
I just tested it and shared network on Root level is not seen by its subdomains!
Best regards,
Jordan
-Original Message-
From: Yordan K
Hi Udo,
This should fix the problem, https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/5063
Regards,
Abhishek
From: Slavka Peleva
Sent: 01 June 2021 21:41
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: 4.15.1 SNAPSHOT: cant create users to account
Hi Udo,
I was able to
M Udo Müller wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi guys,
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> I played around with cloudstack 4.15 and UEFI boot until someone here
>>>> pointed me to a PR which fixes the problem with the missing q35 chipset.
>>>>
>>>
Another development in my troubleshooting this...
I used a vendor (OEM) supplied ova appliance as a template and downloaded in
the same manner. NO SETTINGS were created for the template by ACS.
If the expected behavior is for ACS to add settings based off of the OVF
descriptor - my case IS N
Mike,
are you in a position to share that specific template (if licencing allows,
if it's trial, etc) - ping me on email directly - and I can give it a spin
in the lab on 4.15
4.15.1 should bring this new VMware template behaviour (read from OVF,
instead of allowing you to specify OS, NIC/disk con
..as I assumed - and it exports volume to Secondary Storage as the
intermediate location - all good.
So "live storage migration" doesn't work, as expected.
cheers,
On Fri, 28 May 2021 at 14:11, Kalil de Albuquerque Carvalho <
[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello Andrija.
>
> Sorry for
Just to add on what Abhishek said - IF you configure "
system.vm.default.hypervisor with a preferred value, I don't think that
tags will be considered at all (or might only be considered within the
chosen hypervisor's clusters - but I think they are not... based on a
recent case I've seen)
So you
Hi Mike,
For your deployment/disk controller error, you should check the template you
are using for the VM. From the logs you have shared there is something wrong
with the StartCommand.
---
org.apache.cloudstack.storage.to.TemplateObjectTO":{"id":"0","format":"ISO","accountId":"0","hvm":"false"
Thank you for your help. Set up a tagged VLAN and live migrations are working
like a champ now.
My next issue…
I launched a second guest and noticed it did not allocate a new public IP. My
expectation was that it would allocate another public IP and the second
instance would have its own vir
Sure Andrija, I get you point. Will do the rest of the testing.
> On 02-Jun-2021, at 1:45 AM, Andrija Panic wrote:
>
> Just to add on what Abhishek said - IF you configure "
> system.vm.default.hypervisor with a preferred value, I don't think that
> tags will be considered at all (or might only
Dear everyone,
I would like to use "Bypass VLAN id/range overlap" to create 2
shared networks that span across one VLAN.
Looking in "cloudmonkey create network" help menu I cannot see
such argument.
Is there something I am missing or it is not impl
Hi Jordan,
The 'bypassVlanOverlapCheck' parameter does exist in the createNetwork API, but
during API discovery the parameters sometimes get overwritten. This has been
addressed by https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/pull/4609 and will be
available as part of 4.15.1.
Thanks,
Pearl
__
Thank you Pearl!
Regards,
Jordan
-Original Message-
From: Pearl d'Silva
Sent: Wednesday, June 2, 2021 9:04 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: "Bypass VLAN id/range overlap" argument missing?
[X] This message came from outside your organization
Hi Jordan,
The 'bypassVla
37 matches
Mail list logo
