Hi,
I have found the issue but not I have a different one 😊
When I add the network, if I check the enable providers, there a no providers
enabled.. if I enabled the providers from DB, then I see the networking
offering with tag also for second physical network.
Right now if I try
1. you can enable the providers via cloudmonkey, not by db.
2. all physical networks and network offerings should have tags
3. You should see other exceptions than InsufficientServerCapacityException
in management-server.log
-Wei
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 at 11:09, wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
>I have foun
Hi cristian,
good to hear you are makeing some progress!
as wei wrote my ecperience reagarding networks is, that you will have to
tag ALL physical networks.
The implementation of tag usage is a bit different from ,for example
storage, where tagging works quiet well - even if some ressources aren'
Hi,
1. Thank you
2. I have only 2 networks (after I added the second network I added a tag
also to the first one) both are with tags.
- Do I have do delete any other network which was already created under
networks without tags? I didn't delete because I want to re-create after.
- Do
Hi,
I just found something else, this is not working with vmware?
I tested in a test environment where I have a zone with 2 clusters, 1 with
VMware and one with KVM, if I keep the KVM host enabled, works fine, I can
deploy the network. if I disable the KVM host, I get an error with Insuffi
Maybe some kind of misunderstanding
- with "networks" i was also referring to all entries under zone - your
zone- physical networks. From that i got from your descriptions you should
have at least 3 networks there:
1. Management / Storage / Public
2. Guest I
3. Guest II
and each would be equi
I have only 1 network by default :
1. Management / Storage / Public / Guest - Tag A
2. Guest - Tag B
Now, if I understand right, this is not working in this way? I should have
separated network for guest from the beginning?
1 . Management / Storage /Public - Tag A
2. Guest - Tag B
3. Gue
okay - haven't thought of this kind of setup before :-D
i started all my trials - even the virtulized ones - with dedicated
networks for guest / public / management. and even splitting things up
further now.
but nevertheless i dont't see why your setup shouldn't work. --> at least i
seems to work w
Hi Cristian,
I think it is good. You do not need to change the physical networks.
Have you created a new "network offering" with a tag (A or B) ?
-Wei
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 at 14:02, wrote:
> I have only 1 network by default :
>
> 1. Management / Storage / Public / Guest - Tag A
> 2. Guest
Hello Jordan,
Could you proceed to your tests ? Have you got the same results ?
Regards, Benoit Lair
Le lun. 4 oct. 2021 à 17:59, Yordan Kostov a écrit :
> Here are a few considerations:
>
> - First snapshot of volume is always full snap.
> - XenServer/XCP-NG backups are always thin.
> - Thin
Hi Wei,
Yes, of course 😊
I'm able to create the network with any of the network offering, which are
with tags, the problem is when the router is starting to deploy, I get the same
error without to many details, tested in 2 cloudstack environment 4.15.1 and
4.15.2, in 1 I have multi
I fixed the issue by installing Ceph/RBD packages on the kvm hosts.
After that, Cloudstack was able to find the missing rbd pool. Now I can
use Ceph as a primary storage.
Maybe it is better to use NFS in addition, because as far as I know
making full VM snapshots is not possible with RBD, am I
Hello Benoit,
Unfortunately no.
When I do it I will make sure to drop a line here.
Best regards,
Jordan
-Original Message-
From: benoit lair
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 3:40 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: Size of the snapshots volume
[X] This mes
Regarding 2. * I also saw that you can update the tags for default
network offering.*
If you trie it would be nice to know if everything was working afterwards
:-)
Am Di., 12. Okt. 2021 um 14:40 Uhr schrieb :
> Hi Wei,
>
>
>
> Yes, of course 😊
>
>
>
> I'm able to create the network wit
Hi Cristian,
The configuration looks good.
It looks like cloudstack cannot start the router because the router is
allocated to be deployed on a KVM hypervisor but the only kvm host is
disabled. so it is a capacity issue.
-Wei
On Tue, 12 Oct 2021 at 14:41, wrote:
> Hi Wei,
>
>
>
> Yes, of
Hi all,
while discovering new features and bug fixes in ACS version 4.15.2 I was
wondering where to find the button for theme customization (i.e. dark
mode). I think it should be found far right on the UI as a blue button
in the middle of the window? For some reason I am not able to see the
b
Let's say this is true, I cannot deploy here because the the KVM is disabled,
but there is no such think in my setup which is allowing to deploy systemvms
only on KVM.
In order to avoid this, I just removed the KVM host from this setup, not sure
why is trying to deploy the router on KVM over an
Hi,
I am exploring the subject of CloudStack and Terraform (it works great) with
Kubernetes so I found it would be perfect to put K8S clusters with
kubespray.
Can anyone use kubespray with CS (except Exoscale) on premis (with currently
developed terraform provider 0.4.0)?
I'd love to see som
Update:
I had add tags to all networks/in each zone, looks like right now is
working, I'm not sure if this is a coincidence or not.
Regards,
Cristian
-Original Message-
From: [email protected]
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 4:28 PM
To: [email protected]
Subject:
Hi Mevludin,
The dark mode is currently available on development mode, but not ready yet for
production environments
Regards,
Nicolas Vazquez
From: Mevludin Blazevic
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 2021 10:16 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Dark Mode
Growing xfs root partitions works for my templates, but we are not using lvm on
our templates.
My cloudstack clusters are using KVM.
So these comments may not be helpful on what works.
I tried to keep as much of the default cloud-init config on all the distros
I've built templates for (Ubuntu,
All,
I've fixed the website description, however because of how pypi works it
required re-uploading the v5.3.3 sdist with changes in the setup.py/description:
https://pypi.org/project/cloudmonkey/
Regards.
From: Sina Kashipazha
Sent: Tuesday, October 12, 20
22 matches
Mail list logo
