On 03.11.2021 05:21, Alex Zarifoglu wrote:
> Hello all,
> I have a question about the "priority-fencing-delay" parameter.
> This parameter, although very helpful, it doesn't handle the scenario where
> nodes have equal priority.
It is intended exactly for the scenario where nodes have equal
Hello all,
I have a question about the "priority-fencing-delay" parameter.
This parameter, although very helpful, it doesn't handle the scenario where nodes have equal priority. Thus, it is recommended that fence property pcmk_delay_base is still used to avoid nodes fencing each other if they
>>> Ken Gaillot schrieb am 29.10.2021 um 17:08 in
>>> Nachricht
:
[...]
>> And it the structure of the XML output formally described somewhere?
>
> Sort of ... there's a RelaxNG schema in xml/api in the source, usually
> installed as /usr/share/pacemaker/api. It's not human-friendly but it's
>
