Kristoffer Grönlund writes:
The only solution I know which allows for a configuration like this is
using separate clusters in each data center, and using booth for
transferring ticket ownership between them. Booth requires a data
center-level quorum (meaning at least 3 locations), though the
Hello, Kristoffer
Did you test failover through pacemaker itself?
Yes, I did, no problems here.
However: Am I understanding it correctly that you have one node in each
data center, and a stonith device in each data center?
Yes.
If the
data center is lost, the stonith device for the node
=false, but it doesn't seem
right for me.
Thank you.
Regards,
Alexander Markov
___
Users mailing list: Users@clusterlabs.org
http://lists.clusterlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/users
Project Home: http://www.clusterlabs.org
Getting started: http
a cluster? Survived node, running stonith resource for
dead node tries to contact ipmi device (which is also dead). How does
cluster understand that lost node is really dead and it's not just a
network issue?
Thank you.
--
Regards,
Alexander
Please share your config along with the logs from the nodes that were
effected.
I'm starting to think it's not about how to define stonith resources. If
the whole box is down with all the logical partitions defined, then HMC
cannot define if LPAR (partition) is really dead or just
