. Technical Services Engineer*
Information Technology Services
rnic...@holycross.edu
*phone: *(508) 793-2569
www.holycross.edu
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:49 PM Andrei Borzenkov
wrote:
> 05.05.2020 19:30, Nickle, Richard пишет:
> > So I tried an experiment. I had tried switch over to 'udpu
of my base network in 'bindnetaddr'
doesn't account for networks with CIDR mask bits greater than 24? (which
would have non-zero least significant bytes.)
Thanks,
Rick
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 12:03 PM Andrei Borzenkov
wrote:
> 05.05.2020 16:44, Nickle, Richard пишет:
> > Tha
128 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec
[ 3] 0.0- 3.0 sec 386 KBytes 1.05 Mbits/sec
[ 3] Sent 269 datagrams
Thanks,
Rick
On Tue, May 5, 2020 at 1:54 AM Andrei Borzenkov wrote:
> 05.05.2020 06:39, Nickle, Richard пишет:
> > I have a two node cluster managing a VIP. The service is an SMTP
I have a two node cluster managing a VIP. The service is an SMTP service.
This could be active/active, it doesn't matter which node accepts the SMTP
connection, but I wanted to make sure that a VIP was in place so that there
was a well-known address.
This service has been running for quite
On Fri, Apr 3, 2020 at 7:43 AM Eric Robinson
wrote:
> Greetings,
>
>
>
>1. If DRBD lives **below** or **between** LVM volumes, then:
>
>
>
>1. set global_filter to reject the DRBD backing devices
> 2. set write_cache_state = 0
> 3. set use_lvmetad = 0
> 4. set
I spent many, many hours tackling the two-node problem and I had exactly
the same symptoms (only able to get the resource to move if I moved it
manually) until I did the following:
* Switch to DRBD 9 (added LINBIT repo because DRBD 8 is the default in the
Ubuntu repo)
* Build a third diskless
Thu, 2019-08-15 at 11:25 -0400, Nickle, Richard wrote:
> >
> > My objective is two-node active/passive DRBD device which would
> > automatically fail over, a secondary objective would be to use
> > standard, stock and supported software distributions and repositories
>
My objective is two-node active/passive DRBD device which would
automatically fail over, a secondary objective would be to use standard,
stock and supported software distributions and repositories with as little
customization as possible.
I'm using Ubuntu 18.04.3, plus the DRBD, corosync and
I've built a two-node DRBD cluster with SBD and STONITH, following advice
from ClusterLabs, LinBit, Beekhof's blog on SBD.
I still cannot get automated failover when I down one of the nodes. I
thought that perhaps I needed to have an odd-numbered quorum so I attempted
to follow the
