Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Is there a way to ignore a single monitoring timeout

2017-09-01 Thread Klechomir
On 1 Sep 2017, at 13:15, Klechomir > wrote: What I observe is that single monitoring request of different resources with different resource agents is timing out. For example LVM resource (the LVM RA) does this sometimes. Setting ridiculously high

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Is there a way to ignore a single monitoring timeout

2017-09-01 Thread Kristián Feldsam
S pozdravem Kristián Feldsam Tel.: +420 773 303 353, +421 944 137 535 E-mail.: supp...@feldhost.cz www.feldhost.cz - FeldHost™ – profesionální hostingové a serverové služby za adekvátní ceny. FELDSAM s.r.o. V rohu 434/3 Praha 4 – Libuš, PSČ 142 00 IČ: 290 60 958, DIČ: CZ290 60 958 C 200350

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Is there a way to ignore a single monitoring timeout

2017-09-01 Thread Klechomir
What I observe is that single monitoring request of different resources with different resource agents is timing out. For example LVM resource (the LVM RA) does this sometimes. Setting ridiculously high timeouts (5 minutes and more) didn't solve the problem, so I think I'm out of options

Re: [ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Is there a way to ignore a single monitoring timeout

2017-09-01 Thread Jehan-Guillaume de Rorthais
On Fri, 01 Sep 2017 09:07:16 +0200 "Ulrich Windl" wrote: > >>> Klechomir schrieb am 01.09.2017 um 08:48 in Nachricht > <9f043557-233d-6c1c-b46d-63f8c2ee5...@gmail.com>: > > Hi Ulrich, > > Have to disagree here. > > > > I have cases, when

[ClusterLabs] Antw: Re: Antw: Is there a way to ignore a single monitoring timeout

2017-09-01 Thread Ulrich Windl
>>> Klechomir schrieb am 01.09.2017 um 08:48 in Nachricht <9f043557-233d-6c1c-b46d-63f8c2ee5...@gmail.com>: > Hi Ulrich, > Have to disagree here. > > I have cases, when for an unknown reason a single monitoring request > never returns result. > So having bigger timeouts