Many thanks to you marc for your full description :-)
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Marc Portier
> Gesendet: Montag, 22. Dezember 2003 17:12
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: AW: [Woody] Binding problem for missing
> elements in source file
>
r
Gesendet: Montag, 22. Dezember 2003 12:41
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [Woody] Binding problem for missing elements in
source file
Markus Heussen wrote:
Many thanks to you, now everything works fine :-)
yeah, we get there *eventually*
But two questions I still have:
1. Is it
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Marc Portier
> Gesendet: Montag, 22. Dezember 2003 12:41
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: AW: [Woody] Binding problem for missing elements in
> source file
>
>
>
>
> Markus Heussen wrote:
>
> > Man
er thread where you originally posted this...
Thanks for helping me!
de nada,
-marc=
Greetings, Markus
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: Marc Portier
Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Dezember 2003 16:08
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Woody] Binding problem for missing elements in
source f
ateFormat?
Thanks for helping me!
Greetings, Markus
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Marc Portier
> Gesendet: Samstag, 20. Dezember 2003 16:08
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: AW: AW: [Woody] Binding problem for missing elements in
> source file
>
>
Yo, all.
answer is in the combination of using
- @lenient (for surviving reads from paths that don't exist yet)
- and the o.a.c.util.jxpath.DOMFactory (for creating new paths on the
target XML)
for some mysterious reason one of my commits messed up the auto-registry
of that factory on Nodes, fi
> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
> Von: Upayavira [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 18. Dezember 2003 12:12
> An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Betreff: Re: AW: [Woody] Binding problem for missing elements in source
> file
>
>
> Markus Heussen wrote:
>
> >-Ursprungliche Nachricht
