-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag
von Bruno Dumon
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Mai 2004 20:53
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: JXTemplates - what's in a name?
On Tue, 2004-05-04 at 10:39, Derek Hohls wrote:
Bruno
I apologise
its name currently is KISSTemplateGenerator ;-)
-Ursprungliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Auftrag
von Derek Hohls
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Mai 2004 08:31
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: JXTemplates - what's in a name?
This sounds great
Hohls
Gesendet: Dienstag, 4. Mai 2004 08:31
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: JXTemplates - what's in a name?
This sounds great - exactly what I had in mind -
perhaps JXStringTemplate (in deference to the original
concept) ??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004/05/03 06:31:38 PM
hi derek
The not that different anymore is not altogether
true - rather than go on at length here, please
just take a look at the original article and compare
what is said there vs the functionality of JXT.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004/05/05 10:10:44 AM
-Ursprüngliche Nachricht-
Von: [EMAIL
An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Betreff: Re: AW: JXTemplates - what's in a name?
;-) [but lets drop the Generator part - we are not generating
anything here apart from a view!]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004/05/05 10:14:48 AM
its name currently is KISSTemplateGenerator
This sounds great - exactly what I had in mind -
perhaps JXStringTemplate (in deference to the original
concept) ??
[EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004/05/03 06:31:38 PM
hi derek,
I alse read that paper and agree that it was revealing. it also made
me
rethink view generation (the bad symtpoms had of
hi derek,
I alse read that paper and agree that it was revealing. it also made me
rethink view generation (the bad symtpoms had of course already occurred to
me).
my current idea (pretty blurry ATM) is to create a stripped down version of
the JXT generator (remove the 'power features') and
