Ok, thanks. It is a bit counterintuitive. One would not expect that to
be possible, but it works.
On 15/08/11 08:23, Thomas Markus wrote:
Hi,
i missed the private
i tried direct access and it works fine:
var U = Packages.com.foo bar.UseFul;
U.someMethod('text1', 'stringb');
Packages.com.foo
Hi,
i missed the private
i tried direct access and it works fine:
var U = Packages.com.foo bar.UseFul;
U.someMethod('text1', 'stringb');
Packages.com.foo.bar.UseFul.someMethod('text1', 'stringb');
public class UseFul {
private UseFul() {}
public static void someMethod(String a, Str
On 08/14/2011 03:04 PM, Thomas Markus wrote:
Hi,
or create an instance without spring:
var bean = new com.foo.bar.Useful();
bean.someMethod(arg1, arg2);
Actually, this would (should) not work as the constructor of Useful is
private. It may be that this would not matter in flow, that is, one
Hi,
or create an instance without spring:
var bean = new com.foo.bar.Useful();
bean.someMethod(arg1, arg2);
regards
Thomas
Am 12.08.2011 15:34, schrieb Andre Juffer:
To answer my own question. I created a new entry in the application's
Spring configuration file,
In script, I used
var use
To answer my own question. I created a new entry in the application's
Spring configuration file,
In script, I used
var useful = cocoon.getComponent("com.foo.bar.Useful");
useful.someMethod(arg1, arg2);
This does not require any modification to the source code of the class
(that is, the priv
Hi,
I am dealing with the following. An extremely useful Java class provides
a static method for completing a particular task, like
class Useful {
private Useful() {}
public static void someMethod(String arg1, String arg2)
{
...
}
}
In flow, I do something like
var arg1 = "test1"
