Problem with XIncludes in 2.1.8

2006-01-04 Thread Pasha Minallah
A bug seems to have been introduced in XIncludes in going from 2.1.7 to 2.1.8. They seem fine when used in this form: http://www.w3.org/2001/XInclude"; parse="xml" href="{$common-content-folder}/banner.xml"/> But there is a problem when used in this form: http://www.w3.org/2

Re: Problem with XIncludes in 2.1.8

2006-01-04 Thread Jason Johnston
This looks very similar to http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=COCOON-1489 which was supposedly checked in for 2.1.8. Perhaps that patch fixed one situation but broke another? > A bug seems to have been introduced in XIncludes in going from 2.1.7 to > 2.1.8. > > They seem fine

Re: Problem with XIncludes in 2.1.8

2006-01-04 Thread Pasha Minallah
On Wednesday 04 January 2006 11:48, Jason Johnston wrote: > > This looks very similar to > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=COCOON-1489 which > was supposedly checked in for 2.1.8. Perhaps that patch fixed one > situation but broke another? This is the same issue as in the

Re: Problem with XIncludes in 2.1.8

2006-01-04 Thread Joerg Heinicke
On 04.01.2006 20:30, Pasha Minallah wrote: This looks very similar to http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=COCOON-1489 which was supposedly checked in for 2.1.8. Perhaps that patch fixed one situation but broke another? This is the same issue as in the link. The website se

Re: Problem with XIncludes in 2.1.8

2006-01-04 Thread Jason Johnston
> On Wednesday 04 January 2006 11:48, Jason Johnston wrote: >> >> This looks very similar to >> http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=COCOON-1489 >> which >> was supposedly checked in for 2.1.8. Perhaps that patch fixed one >> situation but broke another? > > This is the same iss

Re: Problem with XIncludes in 2.1.8

2006-01-06 Thread Antonio Gallardo
Jason Johnston wrote: On Wednesday 04 January 2006 11:48, Jason Johnston wrote: This looks very similar to http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/ViewIssue.jspa?key=COCOON-1489 which was supposedly checked in for 2.1.8. Perhaps that patch fixed one situation but broke another? This