Honestly it also looks like a bug to me. I think the string is parsed
form left to right where it should be parsed from right to left or sth
like that ;)
Anyway, i just changed my pattern to
foo/bar/fooo:baar
that workaround the problem :)
Marc
Martijn C. Vos a écrit :
Marc Salvetti [mai
Marc Salvetti [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> i just noticed that
>
> foo/bar/fooo/baar doesn't match the pattern "foo/**/*/*" but
> match the
> pattern "foo/**/*"
>
> Is that a bug or normal behavior ?
Similar inexplicable behaviour was also noticed a few months ago
by Ard Schr
