Re: from Cforms to Wicket

All the cool people swear by caniuse.com [1] ;-) Another very new resource is the WebPlatform.org site [2] which is in alpha at the moment but is the first collaboration between all the major browser manufacturers to document the browser standards and collate bugs. So to answer Mika's questi

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

. cheers, gabriel From: Mika M Lehtonen To: users@cocoon.apache.org, Date: 18.02.2013 15:10 Subject:Re: from Cforms to Wicket Yep, but as I started this chain, I stated that my problem is to "convert" my own defined dynamic XML into HTML4 (or HTML5) forms. I w

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM To: users@cocoon.apache.org <mailto:users@cocoon.apache.org> Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket Ok, thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

February 18, 2013 1:42 PM To: users@cocoon.apache.org <mailto:users@cocoon.apache.org> Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket Ok, thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3. -

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

s.. >>> We can't sell apps without IE-support, absolutely no way. >>> >>> http://people.mozilla.com/~prouget/ie9/ >>> >>> - mika - >>> >>> >>> 18.2.2013 14:45, Robby Pelssers kirjoitti: >>> >>> The on

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

nerate HTML5 content with Cocoon >>> and how did you accomplish this. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Robby >>> >>> -Original Message- >>> From: Mika M Lehtonen [mailto:m...@digikartta.net] >>> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM >&g

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

gt;] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM To: users@cocoon.apache.org <mailto:users@cocoon.apache.org> Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket Ok, thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3. - mika - 18.2.2013 14:25, Fra

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

ady generate HTML5 content with Cocoon >> and how did you accomplish this. >> >> Cheers, >> Robby >> >> -Original Message- >> From: Mika M Lehtonen [mailto:m...@digikartta.net] >> Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM >> To: user

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

Robby -Original Message- From: Mika M Lehtonen [mailto:m...@digikartta.net] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM To: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket Ok, thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3. - mika - 18.2.2013 14:25, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirj

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

On 18/02/2013 13:45, Robby Pelssers wrote: The only thing I wonder about is... Cocoon and neither XSLT2.0 support html5 serialization for all I know. So does someone using Cocoon already generate HTML5 content with Cocoon and how did you accomplish this. Cocoon 2.1 is going to support HTML

RE: from Cforms to Wicket

...@digikartta.net] Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM To: users@cocoon.apache.org Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket Ok, thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3. - mika - 18.2.2013 14:25, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti: > On 18/02/2013 13:09, Mika M Lehtonen wrote: >

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

Ok, thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3. - mika - 18.2.2013 14:25, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti: On 18/02/2013 13:09, Mika M Lehtonen wrote: Yeah, I know what you mean. Most of the Xforms sites are dated back to 2002 or 2003.. Sounds like a standard having glorious f

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

On 18/02/2013 13:09, Mika M Lehtonen wrote: Yeah, I know what you mean. Most of the Xforms sites are dated back to 2002 or 2003.. Sounds like a standard having glorious future behind.. This betterForm still sounded proper for my purposes because it actually implements server-side approache of

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

IMHO, any kind of *Forms* technology is not a viable solution today in the long term. I wouldn't bet on XForms or any other non-standard/standard framework/technology as long as you just don't want to play around with it. The only valid standard today for View part of MVC/MVVP is ... HTML5. Even

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

On 18/02/2013 13:21, Mika M Lehtonen wrote: Is HTML5 something you can really use already having wide range of browsers supported? (Or at least FF, IE and Chrome) Google says (among others) http://www.findmebyip.com/litmus/ 18.2.2013 14:09, gelo1234 kirjoitti: Why using CForms at all ?

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

Is HTML5 something you can really use already having wide range of browsers supported? (Or at least FF, IE and Chrome) - mika - 18.2.2013 14:09, gelo1234 kirjoitti: Why using CForms at all ? If you use XSLT you can transform dynamic XML data into HTML5 native forms templates. Greetings, -Gr

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

On 18/02/2013 13:09, gelo1234 wrote: Why using CForms at all ? If you use XSLT you can transform dynamic XML data into HTML5 native forms templates. HTML5 would be an option, indeed. Regards. 2013/2/18 Mika M Lehtonen > Yep, sounds like a lot of work and

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

Why using CForms at all ? If you use XSLT you can transform dynamic XML data into HTML5 native forms templates. Greetings, -Greg 2013/2/18 Mika M Lehtonen > Yep, > sounds like a lot of work and like re-inventing the wheel.. > > - mika - > > > 18.2.2013 10:47, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti:

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

Yeah, I know what you mean. Most of the Xforms sites are dated back to 2002 or 2003.. Sounds like a standard having glorious future behind.. This betterForm still sounded proper for my purposes because it actually implements server-side approache of Xforms. So I could use Xforms definition fo

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

Yep, sounds like a lot of work and like re-inventing the wheel.. - mika - 18.2.2013 10:47, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti: On 17/02/2013 20:08, Mika M Lehtonen wrote: Hi Francesco, let me tell you what I have now. I implemented a feedback web application for municipial use with C2.11. The

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

On 17/02/2013 21:57, Mika M Lehtonen wrote: How about some XForms implementation like this http://www.betterform.de? Sounds promising.. I personally wouldn't bet much on XForms... Regards. -- Francesco Chicchiriccò ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member http://people.

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

On 17/02/2013 20:08, Mika M Lehtonen wrote: Hi Francesco, let me tell you what I have now. I implemented a feedback web application for municipial use with C2.11. The app is built so that the administrator can create forms picking fields and controls he/she needs. These setting are saved into

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

How about some XForms implementation like this http://www.betterform.de? Sounds promising.. - mika - 17.2.2013 21:08, Mika M Lehtonen kirjoitti: Hi Francesco, let me tell you what I have now. I implemented a feedback web application for municipial use with C2.11. The app is built so that the

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

Hi Francesco, let me tell you what I have now. I implemented a feedback web application for municipial use with C2.11. The app is built so that the administrator can create forms picking fields and controls he/she needs. These setting are saved into db. The end-user app reads these settings fro

Re: from Cforms to Wicket

On 15/02/2013 22:11, Mika M Lehtonen wrote: Hi, I have an application using dynamic Cforms (C2.11), that is, the Cforms definition and templates are created from dynamic XML through XSL. Can this be done with C3 and wickets? From somewhere I read about the fact that with Apache Wickets you do