All the cool people swear by caniuse.com [1] ;-)
Another very new resource is the WebPlatform.org site [2] which is in
alpha at the moment but is the first collaboration between all the major
browser manufacturers to document the browser standards and collate bugs.
So to answer Mika's
.
cheers,
gabriel
From: Mika M Lehtonen m...@digikartta.net
To: users@cocoon.apache.org,
Date: 18.02.2013 15:10
Subject:Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Yep,
but as I started this chain, I stated that my problem is to convert my
own defined dynamic XML into HTML4 (or HTML5) forms
, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
mailto:users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.
- mika
On 17/02/2013 20:08, Mika M Lehtonen wrote:
Hi Francesco,
let me tell you what I have now.
I implemented a feedback web application for municipial use with
C2.11. The app is built so that the administrator can create forms
picking fields and controls he/she needs. These setting are saved into
On 17/02/2013 21:57, Mika M Lehtonen wrote:
How about some XForms implementation like this http://www.betterform.de?
Sounds promising..
I personally wouldn't bet much on XForms...
Regards.
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member
Yeah,
I know what you mean. Most of the Xforms sites are dated back to 2002 or
2003.. Sounds like a standard having glorious future behind..
This betterForm still sounded proper for my purposes because it actually
implements server-side approache of Xforms. So I could use Xforms
definition
Why using CForms at all ? If you use XSLT you can transform dynamic XML
data into HTML5 native forms templates.
Greetings,
-Greg
2013/2/18 Mika M Lehtonen m...@digikartta.net
Yep,
sounds like a lot of work and like re-inventing the wheel..
- mika -
18.2.2013 10:47, Francesco
On 18/02/2013 13:09, gelo1234 wrote:
Why using CForms at all ? If you use XSLT you can transform dynamic
XML data into HTML5 native forms templates.
HTML5 would be an option, indeed.
Regards.
2013/2/18 Mika M Lehtonen m...@digikartta.net
mailto:m...@digikartta.net
Yep,
sounds like
Is HTML5 something you can really use already having wide range of
browsers supported?
(Or at least FF, IE and Chrome)
- mika -
18.2.2013 14:09, gelo1234 kirjoitti:
Why using CForms at all ? If you use XSLT you can transform dynamic
XML data into HTML5 native forms templates.
Greetings,
IMHO, any kind of *Forms* technology is not a viable solution today in the
long term. I wouldn't bet on XForms or any other non-standard/standard
framework/technology as long as you just don't want to play around with it.
The only valid standard today for View part of MVC/MVVP is ... HTML5.
Even
On 18/02/2013 13:09, Mika M Lehtonen wrote:
Yeah,
I know what you mean. Most of the Xforms sites are dated back to 2002
or 2003.. Sounds like a standard having glorious future behind..
This betterForm still sounded proper for my purposes because it
actually implements server-side approache
...@digikartta.net]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.
- mika -
18.2.2013 14:25, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti:
On 18/02/2013 13:09, Mika M Lehtonen wrote:
Yeah,
I
On 18/02/2013 13:45, Robby Pelssers wrote:
The only thing I wonder about is...
Cocoon and neither XSLT2.0 support html5 serialization for all I know. So does
someone using Cocoon already generate HTML5 content with Cocoon and how did you
accomplish this.
Cocoon 2.1 is going to support HTML
-Original Message-
From: Mika M Lehtonen [mailto:m...@digikartta.net]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.
- mika -
18.2.2013 14:25, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti
this.
Cheers,
Robby
-Original Message-
From: Mika M Lehtonen [mailto:m...@digikartta.net]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.
- mika -
18.2.2013 14:25
18, 2013 1:42 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org mailto:users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.
- mika -
18.2.2013 14:25, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti
Cocoon already generate HTML5 content with Cocoon
and how did you accomplish this.
Cheers,
Robby
-Original Message-
From: Mika M Lehtonen [mailto:m...@digikartta.net]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks
]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.
- mika -
18.2.2013 14:25, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti:
On 18/02/2013 13:09, Mika M Lehtonen wrote:
Yeah,
I know
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
mailto:users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.
- mika -
18.2.2013 14:25
Hi Francesco,
let me tell you what I have now.
I implemented a feedback web application for municipial use with C2.11.
The app is built so that the administrator can create forms picking
fields and controls he/she needs. These setting are saved into db. The
end-user app reads these settings
How about some XForms implementation like this http://www.betterform.de?
Sounds promising..
- mika -
17.2.2013 21:08, Mika M Lehtonen kirjoitti:
Hi Francesco,
let me tell you what I have now.
I implemented a feedback web application for municipial use with
C2.11. The app is built so that the
21 matches
Mail list logo
