Para: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: sitemap-v06.rng
Martin Holz wrote:
> I use sitemap-v06.rng for editing the sitemap with oxygen and I like
> it to be very restrictive. So I do not always have to look into the docu
> to see how a configuration looks exactly. I do change the sitema
Martin Holz wrote:
> I use sitemap-v06.rng for editing the sitemap with oxygen and I like
> it to be very restrictive. So I do not always have to look into the docu
> to see how a configuration looks exactly. I do change the sitemap
> quite often but do not write new components very often, especial
On 29.04.2004 17:00, Carmona Perez, David wrote:
Hi,
I also use it for editing and validating with XMLBuddy and Eclipse.
At least there should be some extension mechanism for custom components.
Not only custom components, but all Configurable components need this
non-restrictive validation. I th
PROTECTED]
Asunto: Re: sitemap-v06.rng
Hi,
"Carmona Perez, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I propose to change the RelaxNG validation file sitemap-v06.rng in this way:
> Component declaration like , , , and
> similars would need to be:
[Snipped concrete implementation
Hi,
"Carmona Perez, David" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I propose to change the RelaxNG validation file sitemap-v06.rng in this way:
> Component declaration like , , , and
> similars would need to be:
[Snipped concrete implementation]
> That is, to allow any configuration content. If we make i
