We use the
org.apache.cocoon.transformation.IncludeTransformer class from the scratchpad
block in Cocoon 2.1.6. We've just looked closely at 2.1.7 and discovered that
the scratchpad block is not part of the release.
I understand why
this has been done, but I would like to request that thi
>
> We use the org.apache.cocoon.transformation.IncludeTransformer class
> from the scratchpad block in Cocoon 2.1.6. We've just looked closely at
> 2.1.7 and discovered that the scratchpad block is not part of the
> release.
...
> - it provides critical (for us) cache functionality not provided by
en/if this will be committed to the cocoon src?
Cheers,
Ollie
-Original Message-
From: Jason Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, 16 September 2005 9:12 a.m.
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request to move IncludeTransformer into next release
>
>
>
> Thanks Jason, it would be nice to use a standard-compliant include
> component. We'll look into it. All we really need is for it to include
> the EventValidity we place on our initial data generator step. From the
> comments in bugzilla, it looks like your patch will do this.
Yes it should, if
IncludeTransformer into next release
>
> Thanks Jason, it would be nice to use a standard-compliant include
> component. We'll look into it. All we really need is for it to include
> the EventValidity we place on our initial data generator step. From
> the comments in bugzilla, it l
Oliver Powell wrote:
Another question about the cacheable XIncludeTransformer. I assume the
Xpath parameter is used to form the cache key?
Actually, no, but it shouldn't matter... the thinking is that if the
source file as a whole is valid then any fragments within it will also
be valid.
Co
t: Re: Request to move IncludeTransformer into next release
Oliver Powell wrote:
> Another question about the cacheable XIncludeTransformer. I assume the
> Xpath parameter is used to form the cache key?
Actually, no, but it shouldn't matter... the thinking is that if the
source file as a who
Yes that would be nice. The same goes for us.
We have been using it in production for several months!
Jeroen
Oliver Powell wrote:
We use the org.apache.cocoon.transformation.IncludeTransformer class
from the scratchpad block in Cocoon 2.1.6. We've just looked closely
at 2.1.7 and discovered
September 2005 9:12 a.m.
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: Request to move IncludeTransformer into next release
We use the org.apache.cocoon.transformation.IncludeTransformer class
from the scratchpad block in Cocoon 2.1.6. We've just looked closely
at
2.1.7 and discovered that
