All the cool people swear by caniuse.com [1] ;-)
Another very new resource is the WebPlatform.org site [2] which is in
alpha at the moment but is the first collaboration between all the major
browser manufacturers to document the browser standards and collate bugs.
So to answer Mika's
.
cheers,
gabriel
From: Mika M Lehtonen m...@digikartta.net
To: users@cocoon.apache.org,
Date: 18.02.2013 15:10
Subject:Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Yep,
but as I started this chain, I stated that my problem is to convert my
own defined dynamic XML into HTML4 (or HTML5) forms
, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
mailto:users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.
- mika
On 17/02/2013 20:08, Mika M Lehtonen wrote:
Hi Francesco,
let me tell you what I have now.
I implemented a feedback web application for municipial use with
C2.11. The app is built so that the administrator can create forms
picking fields and controls he/she needs. These setting are saved into
On 17/02/2013 21:57, Mika M Lehtonen wrote:
How about some XForms implementation like this http://www.betterform.de?
Sounds promising..
I personally wouldn't bet much on XForms...
Regards.
--
Francesco Chicchiriccò
ASF Member, Apache Syncope PMC chair, Apache Cocoon PMC Member
Yeah,
I know what you mean. Most of the Xforms sites are dated back to 2002 or
2003.. Sounds like a standard having glorious future behind..
This betterForm still sounded proper for my purposes because it actually
implements server-side approache of Xforms. So I could use Xforms
definition
Why using CForms at all ? If you use XSLT you can transform dynamic XML
data into HTML5 native forms templates.
Greetings,
-Greg
2013/2/18 Mika M Lehtonen m...@digikartta.net
Yep,
sounds like a lot of work and like re-inventing the wheel..
- mika -
18.2.2013 10:47, Francesco
On 18/02/2013 13:09, gelo1234 wrote:
Why using CForms at all ? If you use XSLT you can transform dynamic
XML data into HTML5 native forms templates.
HTML5 would be an option, indeed.
Regards.
2013/2/18 Mika M Lehtonen m...@digikartta.net
mailto:m...@digikartta.net
Yep,
sounds like
Is HTML5 something you can really use already having wide range of
browsers supported?
(Or at least FF, IE and Chrome)
- mika -
18.2.2013 14:09, gelo1234 kirjoitti:
Why using CForms at all ? If you use XSLT you can transform dynamic
XML data into HTML5 native forms templates.
Greetings,
IMHO, any kind of *Forms* technology is not a viable solution today in the
long term. I wouldn't bet on XForms or any other non-standard/standard
framework/technology as long as you just don't want to play around with it.
The only valid standard today for View part of MVC/MVVP is ... HTML5.
Even
On 18/02/2013 13:09, Mika M Lehtonen wrote:
Yeah,
I know what you mean. Most of the Xforms sites are dated back to 2002
or 2003.. Sounds like a standard having glorious future behind..
This betterForm still sounded proper for my purposes because it
actually implements server-side approache
...@digikartta.net]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.
- mika -
18.2.2013 14:25, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti:
On 18/02/2013 13:09, Mika M Lehtonen wrote:
Yeah,
I
On 18/02/2013 13:45, Robby Pelssers wrote:
The only thing I wonder about is...
Cocoon and neither XSLT2.0 support html5 serialization for all I know. So does
someone using Cocoon already generate HTML5 content with Cocoon and how did you
accomplish this.
Cocoon 2.1 is going to support HTML
-Original Message-
From: Mika M Lehtonen [mailto:m...@digikartta.net]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.
- mika -
18.2.2013 14:25, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti
this.
Cheers,
Robby
-Original Message-
From: Mika M Lehtonen [mailto:m...@digikartta.net]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.
- mika -
18.2.2013 14:25
18, 2013 1:42 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org mailto:users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.
- mika -
18.2.2013 14:25, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti
Cocoon already generate HTML5 content with Cocoon
and how did you accomplish this.
Cheers,
Robby
-Original Message-
From: Mika M Lehtonen [mailto:m...@digikartta.net]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks
]
Sent: Monday, February 18, 2013 1:42 PM
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.
- mika -
18.2.2013 14:25, Francesco Chicchiriccò kirjoitti:
On 18/02/2013 13:09, Mika M Lehtonen wrote:
Yeah,
I know
To: users@cocoon.apache.org
mailto:users@cocoon.apache.org
Subject: Re: from Cforms to Wicket
Ok,
thanks for your efforts. HTML5 it is, with or without C3.
- mika -
18.2.2013 14:25
Hi Francesco,
let me tell you what I have now.
I implemented a feedback web application for municipial use with C2.11.
The app is built so that the administrator can create forms picking
fields and controls he/she needs. These setting are saved into db. The
end-user app reads these settings
How about some XForms implementation like this http://www.betterform.de?
Sounds promising..
- mika -
17.2.2013 21:08, Mika M Lehtonen kirjoitti:
Hi Francesco,
let me tell you what I have now.
I implemented a feedback web application for municipial use with
C2.11. The app is built so that the
Hi,
I have an application using dynamic Cforms (C2.11), that is, the Cforms
definition and templates are created from dynamic XML through XSL.
Can this be done with C3 and wickets?
From somewhere I read about the fact that with Apache Wickets you don't
need any XML..
- mika -
22 matches
Mail list logo