On 9/28/2007 5:27 PM, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Lars Huttar pisze:
Understandable...
but that doesn't sound like a beta release to me, if it was never
announced as such.
Not to be critical ... I'm just trying to gauge the risk factor of
diving into Cocoon 2.2 for our production apps,
Lars Huttar pisze:
> Understandable...
> but that doesn't sound like a beta release to me, if it was never
> announced as such.
>
> Not to be critical ... I'm just trying to gauge the risk factor of
> diving into Cocoon 2.2 for our production apps,
If I was the one giving advice I would suggest t
On 9/27/2007 8:21 PM, Joerg Heinicke wrote:
On 27.09.2007 18:17 Uhr, Lars Huttar wrote:
I see a lot of questions and bug reports about 2.2; but I suppose
that's to be expected from a mailing list.
Was there ever an announcement of 2.2RC1 being released? (I see a lot
of discussion about it on t
On 27.09.2007 18:17 Uhr, Lars Huttar wrote:
I see a lot of questions and bug reports about 2.2; but I suppose that's
to be expected from a mailing list.
Was there ever an announcement of 2.2RC1 being released? (I see a lot of
discussion about it on the dev list, up to July 2, but I don't see an
Grzegorz, thanks for your reply.
On 9/26/2007 3:27 PM, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Lars Huttar pisze:
I appreciate the recommendation. I will be interested to look into
Cocoon 2.2.
However, production applications for our organization are running on
Cocoon. Can I justify the risk of using an
Raphaël Piéroni pisze:
> Hi,
Hi Raphaël
> About this marvelous documentation,
> Is there a way to get the whole 2.2 documentation in one pdf ?
Not yet but certainly we plan to do it.
--
Grzegorz Kossakowski
Committer and PMC Member of Apache Cocoon
http://reflectingonthevicissitudes.wordpress.
Grzegorz Kossakowski a écrit :
Lars Huttar pisze:
I appreciate the recommendation. I will be interested to look into
Cocoon 2.2.
However, production applications for our organization are running on
Cocoon. Can I justify the risk of using an alpha version of Cocoon for
production apps?
Lars Huttar pisze:
> I appreciate the recommendation. I will be interested to look into
> Cocoon 2.2.
> However, production applications for our organization are running on
> Cocoon. Can I justify the risk of using an alpha version of Cocoon for
> production apps?
It's certainly not in alpha state
On 9/25/2007 3:18 PM, Grzegorz Kossakowski wrote:
Lars Huttar pisze:
Hello,
We've been using Cocoon for a few years now. We've made lots of our own
modifications to cocoon.xconf (and the top-level sitemap).
Now whenever we want to update Cocoon, the changes to cocoon.xconf from
the update are
On 9/25/2007 3:39 PM, Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
On 9/24/07, Lars Huttar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
...What is the recommended way to keep local configuration changes separate
from changes in the distribution?
Does the method described at
http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/cocooninaction/1
On 9/24/07, Lars Huttar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> ...What is the recommended way to keep local configuration changes separate
> from changes in the distribution?
> Does the method described at
> http://cocoon.zones.apache.org/daisy/cocooninaction/14.html really work
> well?
> (using Ant and its
Lars Huttar pisze:
> Hello,
> We've been using Cocoon for a few years now. We've made lots of our own
> modifications to cocoon.xconf (and the top-level sitemap).
> Now whenever we want to update Cocoon, the changes to cocoon.xconf from
> the update are very difficult to merge with our own changes
Hello,
We've been using Cocoon for a few years now. We've made lots of our own
modifications to cocoon.xconf (and the top-level sitemap).
Now whenever we want to update Cocoon, the changes to cocoon.xconf from
the update are very difficult to merge with our own changes without
breaking Cocoon.
13 matches
Mail list logo
