Re: specifying "-s" flag for openntpd in rc.conf does not work

2012-04-04 Thread Andrey N. Oktyabrski
On 04.04.12 12:14, Siju George wrote: openntpd_enable="YES" openntpd_flags="-s" in rc.conf to set the time immediately at startup if the local clock is off by more than 180 seconds. But openntpd does not correct the time at start up. Should it be done another way? Why you do not use dntpd whi

Re: iftop - re0: Debug: IFF_OACTIVE was not set when re_tx_free was below minimum

2012-04-04 Thread Sepherosa Ziehau
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Siju George wrote: > Hi, > > I get the error > >  kernel: re0: Debug: IFF_OACTIVE was not set when re_tx_free was below > minimum! Just a debug message, you could ignore it. Best Regards, sephe -- Tomorrow Will Never Die

Re: iftop - re0: Debug: IFF_OACTIVE was not set when re_tx_free was below minimum

2012-04-04 Thread Siju George
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 2:32 PM, Sepherosa Ziehau wrote: > On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 3:54 PM, Siju George wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I get the error >> >>  kernel: re0: Debug: IFF_OACTIVE was not set when re_tx_free was below >> minimum! > > Just a debug message, you could ignore it. > Thank you :-) --Si

Re: specifying "-s" flag for openntpd in rc.conf does not work

2012-04-04 Thread Andrey N. Oktyabrski
On 04.04.12 13:58, Siju George wrote: doesn't work for me :-( Is it VM? Possibly it is a VM issue? I have not more ideas at the time... P.S. To the mail list administrator: DragonFly mail lists have not the Reply-To header. Is it possible to add it in the mail lists manager settings? I forget

Updating Jails?

2012-04-04 Thread Konrad Neuwirth
Hello everyone, the handbook on the website is very helpful in regards to jails, and I was able to set up a jail or three quite quickly following the instructions there. What I do not yet understand, though, is what the process would be to update a jail once you decide to update the hosting sy

Re: specifying "-s" flag for openntpd in rc.conf does not work

2012-04-04 Thread McLone
2012/4/4 Andrey N. Oktyabrski : > P.S. To the mail list administrator: DragonFly mail lists have not the > Reply-To header. Is it possible to add it in the mail lists manager > settings? I forget to "Reply all" regularly and press "Reply" instead :-( seconding -- wbr,                        |\   

Re: specifying "-s" flag for openntpd in rc.conf does not work

2012-04-04 Thread David Crosswell
On 05/04/12 03:54, McLone wrote: > 2012/4/4 Andrey N. Oktyabrski : >> P.S. To the mail list administrator: DragonFly mail lists have not the >> Reply-To header. Is it possible to add it in the mail lists manager >> settings? I forget to "Reply all" regularly and press "Reply" instead :-( > secondin

Re: specifying "-s" flag for openntpd in rc.conf does not work

2012-04-04 Thread Max Herrgard
David Crosswell wrote: On 05/04/12 03:54, McLone wrote: 2012/4/4 Andrey N. Oktyabrski: P.S. To the mail list administrator: DragonFly mail lists have not the Reply-To header. Is it possible to add it in the mail lists manager settings? I forget to "Reply all" regularly and press "Reply" instead

Re: specifying "-s" flag for openntpd in rc.conf does not work

2012-04-04 Thread Pierre Abbat
On Wednesday, April 04, 2012 15:57:34 David Crosswell wrote: > Get a better client. > This was sent with the 'Reply List' feature in Ice-Dove. > This app. may not be available in DFly, but there must be others. > Regards, I use Kmail, which also has Reply to List. It has been available off and on

Re: specifying "-s" flag for openntpd in rc.conf does not work

2012-04-04 Thread David Crosswell
On 05/04/12 06:50, Max Herrgard wrote: > David Crosswell wrote: >> On 05/04/12 03:54, McLone wrote: >>> 2012/4/4 Andrey N. Oktyabrski: P.S. To the mail list administrator: DragonFly mail lists have not the Reply-To header. Is it possible to add it in the mail lists manager settings?

Reply-To / was: Re: specifying "-s" flag for openntpd in rc.conf does not work

2012-04-04 Thread Matthias Rampke
"You are holding it wrong"™ This is not a question of mail client features and your particular favourite being superior to everything else. The question is: what should be _the default_? Should a reply to a public question be public as well unless explicitly chosen not to be or should it be