On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:50:05PM +0100, Simon 'corecode' Schubert wrote:
> >It surely did work. A lot has changed in the mean time and I seriously
> >lack the time to also keep wip in sync -- esp. with the general
> >linprocfs issue I mentioned already.
>
> could you give us details what is miss
Joerg Sonnenberger wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:24:20AM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
For some reason, I thought the pkgsrc system did work at one time.
It surely did work. A lot has changed in the mean time and I seriously
lack the time to also keep wip in sync -- esp. with the general
l
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:24:20AM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> For some reason, I thought the pkgsrc system did work at one time.
It surely did work. A lot has changed in the mean time and I seriously
lack the time to also keep wip in sync -- esp. with the general
linprocfs issue I mentioned a
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 10:33:36AM +0200, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
> The pkgsrc's scsl-jdk seems to take into consideration only netbsd
> host, how could it possibly work?
I was referring to wip/jdk14.
Some of the commit messages indicate some sort of DragonFly support:
http://pkgsrc-wip.cvs.source
The pkgsrc's scsl-jdk seems to take into consideration only netbsd
host, how could it possibly work?
For building, I modified fairly recent (then) freebsd port, not
"ancient" (what did you mean by that?). I believe I've included those
modifications in the binary attached to those message, too.
On Tue, Feb 13, 2007 at 09:35:37AM +0200, Yury Tarasievich wrote:
> It was built on 1.4.4 system, and yes, I'm treasuring the binary
> package, as it still works. For how long yet, I wonder?
>
> BTW, I wasn't able to replicate this compiling feat on 1.6--1.7. On
> 1.4.4, I was able to exploit the
It was built on 1.4.4 system, and yes, I'm treasuring the binary
package, as it still works. For how long yet, I wonder?
BTW, I wasn't able to replicate this compiling feat on 1.6--1.7. On
1.4.4, I was able to exploit the similarity-with-freebsd aspect. Not
anymore, and nothing was put in to subs
On Mon, February 12, 2007 3:25 pm, Francois Tigeot wrote:
> Does anyone remember when the last succesfull jdk build happened ?
http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2006-07/msg00051.html
The attached binaries in that message may even work.
On Sun, Feb 11, 2007 at 09:53:27AM +0100, Francois Tigeot wrote:
>
> I tried to build a native wip/jdk14.
>
> I used a one year old version of lang/sun-jdk14 as a bootstrap since
> recent version fail with an illegal system call error.
>
> The build failed after 2 hours with these error messages
