On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 11:37:18AM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > Ok, I added an alternate entry for your CPU(updated the source code on my
> > web server). Although msr tells the highest and the lowest (freq, volt)
> > pairs, I used a guess for the second and the third pairs. It's very like
On Sat, Jun 24, 2006 at 12:19:28PM +0900, YONETANI Tomokazu wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 05:44:54PM +0200, Thomas Schlesinger wrote:
> > this is the output of your latetest version:
> >
> > Enhanced SpeedStep (1308 mV) - unknown CPU or operating
> > point(cpu_id:1752x,
> > msr:0x6120d260600
Thomas Schlesinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Johannes,
>
> thank you very much for your hint to the sysctl-switches and your patch. It's
> very good to be able to cool down my CPU on hot summer days and giving my
> notebook a longer run on train rides ;-)
>
> Thomas
You also might want t
ol the CPU frequency? I've tried the estctrl hack from
> > Johannes Hofmann
> > (http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2006-05/msg00069.html),
> > but that didn't work with the netbsd-based est module:
> >
> > SchlesisNB# ./estctrl
> > estctrl:
ed SpeedStep (1308 mV) 1733 MHz
> Enhanced SpeedStep frequencies available (MHz): 1729 1333 1067 798
>
>
> How can I control the CPU frequency? I've tried the estctrl hack from
> Johannes
> Hofmann
> (http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2006-05/msg00069.html), b
I've tried the estctrl hack from Johannes
Hofmann
(http://leaf.dragonflybsd.org/mailarchive/users/2006-05/msg00069.html), but
that didn't work with the netbsd-based est module:
SchlesisNB# ./estctrl
estctrl: Error reading supported CPU frequencies: No such file or directory
Thanks,
Thomas
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 05:44:54PM +0200, Thomas Schlesinger wrote:
> this is the output of your latetest version:
>
> Enhanced SpeedStep (1308 mV) - unknown CPU or operating point(cpu_id:1752x,
> msr:0x6120d2606000d26).
> module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (est, df467edc, 0) error 45
Ok, I added a
Am Freitag, 23. Juni 2006 17:23 schrieb YONETANI Tomokazu:
> On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 08:50:36AM +0200, Thomas Schlesinger wrote:
> > Enhanced SpeedStep (1308 mV) % MHz - unknown CPU or operating point.
>
>^^
>
> > module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (est, df26eef9, 0) err
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 08:50:36AM +0200, Thomas Schlesinger wrote:
> Enhanced SpeedStep (1308 mV) % MHz - unknown CPU or operating point.
^^
> module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (est, df26eef9, 0) error 45
Sorry, wrong printf format string. I changed the debug code a b
Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 18:34 schrieb YONETANI Tomokazu:
> Hm, the voltage 1308 is not listed in pentium_m_n740[]. I added
> code to also print the frequency in the above message. Can you
> try again with new file and tell me the above result?
Yonatani,
I've downloaded the netbsd-est.c
On Fri, Jun 23, 2006 at 07:14:39AM +0900, YONETANI Tomokazu wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 09:25:30PM +0200, Thomas Schlesinger wrote:
> > I've discovered the sysctl-switch dev.cpu.0.freq_levels on FreeBSD . I
> > gives
> > me this values for my notebook: 1731/1514/1298/1081/865/649/432/216. Th
Johannes Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Hi, with this patch I only see the syctl for available freqs:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ >sysctl machdep.est
> > machdep.est.frequency.available: 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ >
> >
> > No idea why though...
>
> Ok, the SYS
Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 18:34 schrieb YONETANI Tomokazu:
>
> Hm, the voltage 1308 is not listed in pentium_m_n740[]. I added
> code to also print the frequency in the above message. Can you
> try again with new file and tell me the above result?
Sure, if you give me the code ;-)
Thomas
Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 20:28 schrieb Johannes Hofmann:
> Johannes Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Hi, with this patch I only see the syctl for available freqs:
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~ >sysctl machdep.est
> > machdep.est.frequency.available: 1800 1600 1400 1200 1000 800 600
>
Johannes Hofmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> YONETANI Tomokazu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 03:36:38PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 02:42:58PM +0200, Thomas Schlesinger wrote:
>>> > Unfortunately, it seems not to support my Pentium-M 1.73GHz
Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 19:21 schrieb Thomas Schlesinger:
>
> With this settings, Speedstep did work in Linux.
>
> I've set the CPU Power Saving to DISABLED, but that didn't help, the same
> error occurs. I've also booted with CPU Power Saving DISABLED and without
> ACPI, same thing.
>
> I
YONETANI Tomokazu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 03:36:38PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 02:42:58PM +0200, Thomas Schlesinger wrote:
>> > Unfortunately, it seems not to support my Pentium-M 1.73GHz (Pentium
>> > M-740,
>> > 533MHz FSB):
>>
>> N
Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 18:24 schrieb [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 06:00:36PM +0200, Thomas Schlesinger wrote:
> > But I get an error, too, when loading it:
> > Enhanced SpeedStep (1308 mV) - unknown CPU or operating point.
> > module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (est, dea64ecf, 0)
YONETANI Tomokazu wrote:
So my question is: Thomas(and anybody else), can you try my untested
patch and see if it works for you? (untested because I don't have
access to any Pentium-M machines now)
Seems to work here with my 770:
Jun 22 18:48:47 dim kernel: Enhanced SpeedStep (0 MHz/988
mV)
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 06:00:36PM +0200, Thomas Schlesinger wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 17:29 schrieb YONETANI Tomokazu:
>
>
> > So my question is: Thomas(and anybody else), can you try my untested
> > patch and see if it works for you? (untested because I don't have
> > access to any
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 06:00:36PM +0200, Thomas Schlesinger wrote:
> But I get an error, too, when loading it:
> Enhanced SpeedStep (1308 mV) - unknown CPU or operating point.
> module_register_init: MOD_LOAD (est, dea64ecf, 0) error 45
Can you try to disable BIOS control over the CPU frequency
Am Donnerstag, 22. Juni 2006 17:29 schrieb YONETANI Tomokazu:
> So my question is: Thomas(and anybody else), can you try my untested
> patch and see if it works for you? (untested because I don't have
> access to any Pentium-M machines now)
>
Yonetani,
thanks for your patch.
First, it didn'
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 03:36:38PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 02:42:58PM +0200, Thomas Schlesinger wrote:
> > Unfortunately, it seems not to support my Pentium-M 1.73GHz (Pentium M-740,
> > 533MHz FSB):
>
> NetBSD has
> /* Intel Pentium M processor 740 1.73 GHz */
>
ented out this
check:
/* if (strncmp(hwmodel, "Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor", 31) ||
(findcpu() != 0)) {
printf("%s: Enhanced Speedstep not supported"
" on this processor\n", hwmode
On Thu, Jun 22, 2006 at 02:42:58PM +0200, Thomas Schlesinger wrote:
> Unfortunately, it seems not to support my Pentium-M 1.73GHz (Pentium M-740,
> 533MHz FSB):
NetBSD has
/* Intel Pentium M processor 740 1.73 GHz */
static const struct fq_info pentium_m_n740[] = {
{ 1733, 1356 },
{
Hi,
today, I've seen with pleasure that there's now an est module in the kernel.
Unfortunately, it seems not to support my Pentium-M 1.73GHz (Pentium M-740,
533MHz FSB):
#kldload est
Intel(R) Pentium(R) M processor 1.73GHz: Enhanced Speedstep not supported on
this
26 matches
Mail list logo
